Download This PaperAggregation, Partiality, and the Strong Beneficence Principle
25 Pages Posted: 4 Oct 2007
Date Written: October 3, 2007
Abstract
Consider the Strong Beneficence Principle (SBP): Persons of affluent means ought to give to those who might fail basic human subsistence until the point at which they must give up something of comparable moral importance. This principle has been the subject of much recent discussion. In this paper, I argue that no coherent interpretation of SBP can be found. SBP faces an interpretive trilemma, each horn of which should be unacceptable to fans of SBP; SBP is either a) so strong as to be patently absurd; b) implausible given its acceptance of a form of numbers skepticism; c) drained of all its demanding force. In the conclusion, I show how the problems with SBP generalize to all similarly demanding principles of beneficence.
Keywords: Peter Singer, beneficence, aggregation, partiality
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation