Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T05:49:35.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are there two populations of refixations in the reading of long words?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2004

Karine Doré-Mazars ,
Dorine Vergilino-Perez  and
Thérèse Collins
Karine Doré-Mazars*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Psychologie Expérimentale, UMR 8581 CNRS Université René DescartesParis 5, Francehttp://d.vergilinoperez.free.fr
Dorine Vergilino-Perez*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Psychologie Expérimentale, UMR 8581 CNRS Université René DescartesParis 5, Francehttp://d.vergilinoperez.free.fr
Thérèse Collins
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Psychologie Expérimentale, UMR 8581 CNRS Université René DescartesParis 5, Francehttp://d.vergilinoperez.free.fr
*
dore@psycho.univ-paris5.fr
vergilino@psycho.univ-paris5.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This commentary focuses on the limitations of the E-Z Reader model in its attempt to explain refixation saccades in reading. Listing factors that influence probability of refixating leads the model to assume two sorts of refixations. However, taking into account data on the metrics of refixation saccades allows us to propose an alternative explanation for empirical observations reported in the literature.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , August 2003 , pp. 480 - 481
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)