Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T05:45:45.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

HOW VAGUENESS COULD CUT OUT AT ANY ORDER

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2014

CIAN DORR
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Symbolic Logic , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , March 2015 , pp. 1 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bacon, A. (MS). Vagueness and Thought.Google Scholar
Caie, M. (2012). Vagueness and semantic indiscriminability. Philosophical Studies, 160, 365–377.Google Scholar
Dorr, C. (2010). Iterating definiteness. In Dietz, R., & Morruzzi, S. editors. Cuts and Clouds: Vagueness, its Nature, and its Logic, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 550–575.Google Scholar
Fara, D. (2002). An anti-epistemicist consequence of margin for error semantics for knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 64, 127–142.Google Scholar
Kearns, S., & Magidor, O. (2008). Epistemicism about vagueness and meta-linguistic safety. Philosophical Perspectives, 22, 277–304.Google Scholar
Mahtani, A. (2008). Can vagueness cut out at any order? Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 86, 499–508.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. (1990). Identity and Discrimination. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. (1994). Vagueness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. (1999). On the stucture of higher-order vagueness. Mind, 108, 127–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar