Skip to main content
Log in

Indeterminacy and Moral Action in Laozi

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is an apparent tension in Laozi 老子 between his denial of the adequacy of positive theoretical formulations and his concomitant endorsement of certain kinds of practical action over others. Laozi writes, for example, “Where they all know the good as good, there is evil, Therefore Being and non-being produce each other” (Laozi 2.3–5), which suggests that good and evil produce each other the way being and non-being produce each other; in which case to do good will lead to evil and to do evil will lead to good. The result threatens to become moral paralysis. I argue that this destabilization of moral concepts does not amount to a moral relativism, but leaves us with a consistent moral point of view in its own way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alquiros, Hilmar. 2002. Lǎozĭ 老子 Lao Tzu, Dàodéjīng 道 德 經 Tao Te Ching. http://www.tao-te-king.org/.

  • Ames, Roger, and David Hall, trans. 2003. Dao De Jing: A Philosophical Translation. New York: Ballentine.

  • Aristotle. 1984. Ethica Nicomachea, edited by Ingram Bywater. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • The Analects. 1979. Trans. by D. C. Lau. London: Penguin Books.

  • Boodberg, Peter. 1957. “Philological Notes on Chapter One of the Lao Tzu.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 20: 598–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Wing-Tsit. 1963a. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1963b. The Way of Lao Tzu. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Ellen. 1989. The Tao Te Ching: A New Translation and Commentary. New York: Paragon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, Mark. 1999. “Mysticism and Apophatic Discourse in the Laozi.” See Csikszentmihalyi and Ivanhoe 1999.

  • _____, and Philip Ivanhoe, eds. 1999. Religious and Philosophical Aspects of the Laozi. Albany: SUNY.

  • Donne, John. 1952. The Complete Poetry and Selected Prose of John Donne, edited by Charles N. Coffin. New York: Modern Library.

  • Fu, Charles Wei-hsun. 1973. “Lao-Tzu’s Conception of Tao.” Inquiry 16: 367–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung, Yu-lan. 1948. A Short History of Chinese Philosophy. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girardot, N. J. 1983. Myth and Meaning in Early Taoism. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, W. K. C. 1971. A History of Greek Philosophy, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henricks, Robert. 2000. Lao Tzu’s Tao Te Ching: A Translation of the Startling New Documents Found at Guodian. New York: Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heraclitus. 1966. Fragments. In Hermann Diels and Walther Kranz, Die Fragmente der Vorsokratike, 12th ed. Zürich: Weidmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huainanzi 淮南子. Date unknown. Sibu Congkan 四部叢刊 edition.

  • Ivanhoe, Philip. 1999. “The Concept of de (“Virtue”) in the Laozi.” See Csikszentmihalyi and Ivanhoe 1999.

  • LaFargue, Michael. 1994. Tao and Method: A Reasoned Approach to the Tao Te Ching. Albany: SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Xiaogan. 1999. “The Core Value of Laozi’s Philosophy.” See Csikszentmihalyi and Ivanhoe 1999.

  • Masami, Tateno. 1999. “The Laozi from an Ontological Perspective.” See Csikszentmihalyi and Ivanhoe 1999.

  • Nagarjuna. 1995. The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way: Nagarjuna’s Mulamadhyamakakarika. Trans. with a commentary by Jay Garfield. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Robinet, Isabelle. 1999. “The Diverse Interpretations of the Laozi.” See Csikszentmihalyi and Ivanhoe 1999.

  • Roth, Harold. 1999. “Early Daoist Mystical Praxis.” See Csikszentmihalyi and Ivanhoe 1999: 59–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Huston. 1964. The Religions of Man. New York: Harper Colophon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Norden, Bryan. 1999. “Method in the Madness of the Laozi.” See Csikszentmihalyi and Ivanhoe 1999.

  • Waley, Arthur. 1958. The Way and Its Power: Lao Tzu’s Tao Te Ching and Its Place in Chinese Thought. New York: Evergreen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Bi. 1979. Commentary on the Lao Tzu, trans. by Ariane Rump. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

  • Wang, Yang-ming. 1963. Commentary on “The Great Learning.” See Chan 1963a.

  • Watson, Burton, trans. 1968. The Complete Works of Chuang Tzu. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Wing, R. L. 1984. The Tao of Power. New York: Doubleday/Dolphin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Jiyuan. 2007. The Ethics of Confucius and Aristotle. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Xi. 1990. Learning to be a Sage: Selections from the Conversations of Master Chu, Arranged Topically, trans. and edited by Daniel Gardner. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth Dorter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dorter, K. Indeterminacy and Moral Action in Laozi. Dao 13, 63–81 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-013-9358-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-013-9358-6

Keywords

Navigation