REFERENCES
Dennett, D. (1991): Consciousness Explained, Boston: Little, Brown and Co.
Ducasse, C.J. (1952): ‘Moore's Refutation of Idealism’, in P.A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of G. E. Moore, New York: Tudor.
Grahek, N. (1995): ‘The Sensory Dimension of Pain’, Philosophical Studies 79, 167–184.
Jackson, F. (1986): ‘What Mary Didn't Know’, Journal of Philosophy 88(5), 291–295.
Langsam, H. (1995): ‘Why Pains are Mental Objects’, Journal of Philosophy 92, 303–313.
Melzak, R. and Wall, P.D. (1988): The Challenge of Pain, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Nelkin, N. (1986): ‘Pains and Pain Sensations’, The Journal of Philosophy 83, 129–148.
Ryle, G. (1949): The Concept of Mind, London: Hutchinson and Co.
Spanos, N.P., Perlini, A.H. and Robertson, L.A. (1989): ‘Hypnosis, Suggestion, and Placebo in the Reduction of Experimental Pain’, Journal of Experimental Psychology 98(3), 285–293.
Tye, M. (1984): ‘Pain and the Adverbial Theory’, American Philosophical Quarterly 21(4), 319–327.
Tye, M. (1989): The Metaphysics of Mind, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Douglas, G. Why Pains Are Not Mental Objects. Philosophical Studies 91, 127–148 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004280711849
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004280711849