Abstract
Drawing on Earman’s (1986) definition of determinism and Lewis’ (Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 61, 343–377, 1983) best systems account of laws, in What Makes Time Special? (2017) Craig Callender develops an account of time as ‘the strongest thing’. The characterisation of this account apparently assumes no action at a temporal distance, an assumption that also underlies Earman’s account of determinism. In this paper I show that there is a way to define determinism that allows worlds with action at a temporal distance to count as deterministic, that action at a temporal distance is possible on a best systems account of laws, and hence that Callender need not make this assumption.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adlam, E. (2018). Spooky action at a temporal distance. Entropy, 20, 41.
Berkovitz, J. (1998a). Aspects of quantum non-locality I: Superluminal signalling, action-at-a-distance, non-separability and holism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 29, 183–222.
Berkovitz, J. (1998b). Aspects of quantum non-locality II: Superluminal causation and relativity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 29, 509–545.
Bigelow, J., Collins, J., & Pargetter, R. (1993). The big bad bug: What are the Humean's chances? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 44, 443–462.
Callender, C. (2017). What makes time special? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cohen, J., & Callender, C. (2009). A better best system account of Lawhood. Philosophical Studies, 145, 1–34.
Driver, R. (1979). Can the future influence the present? Physical Review D, 19, 1098–1107.
Earman, J. (1986). A primer on determinism. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Earman, J. (1995). Bangs, crunches, whimpers, and shrieks: Singularities and Acausalities in relativistic Spacetimes. New York: Oxford University Press.
Einstein, A. (1920). Relativity: The special and the general theory. London: Methuen & Co Ltd.
Einstein, A. (1971). The Born-Einstein Letters: Correspondence between Albert Einstein and Max and Hedwig Born from 1916 to 1955, tr. Irene born. New York: Walker.
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935). Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical Review, 47, 777–780.
Forbes, G., & Parkkinen, V.-P. (2017). Delayed causation. Hoboken: Time and Causality in the Sciences Conference.
Friedman, J., Morris, M., Novikov, I., Echeverria, F., Klinkhammer, G., Thorne, K., & Yurtsever, U. (1990). Cauchy problem in Spacetimes with closed Timelike curves. Physical Review D, 42, 1915–1930.
Frisch, M. (2005). Inconsistency, asymmetry, and non-locality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Frisch, M., & Pietsch, W. (2016). Reassessing the Ritz–Einstein debate on the radiation asymmetry in classical electrodynamics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 55, 13–23.
Gödel, K. (1949). An example of a new type of cosmological solutions of Einstein's field equations of gravitation. Reviews of Modern Physics, 21, 447–450.
Hawking, S. (1992). Chronology protection conjecture. Physical Review D, 46, 603–611.
Hesse, M. (1961). Forces and fields: The concept of action at a distance in the history of physics. London: Nelson.
Hume, D. L. A. Selby-Bigge & P. H. Nidditch (Eds.) (1738/1978). A. treatise of human nature. Oxford: Clarendon.
Lange, M. (2002). An introduction to the philosophy of physics: Locality, fields, energy and mass. Oxford: Blackwell.
Laplace, P. (1814/1951). A philosophical essay on probabilities. Translated F.W. Truscott and F.L. Emory. New York: Dover.
Lazarovici, D. (2017). Against Fields. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 8, 145–170.
Le Poidevin, R. (2007). Action at a distance. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 81, 21–36.
Lewis, D. (1983). New work for a theory of universal. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 61, 343–377.
Lewis, D. (1986). Philosophical papers volume II. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, D. (1988). On the plurality of worlds. London: Blackwell.
Lewis, D. (1994). Humean Supervenience Debugged. Mind, 103, 473–490.
Mill, J. S. (1843). A system of logic. London: Longman.
Mundy, B. (1989). Distant action in classical electromagnetic theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 40, 39–68.
Norsen, T. (2011). John S. Bell’s concept of local causality. American Journal of Physics, 79, 1261–1275.
Pietsch, W. (2010). On conceptual issues in classical electrodynamics: Prospects and problems of an action-at-a-distance interpretation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 41, 67–77.
Roberts, J. (1998). Lewis, Carroll, and seeing through the looking glass. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 76, 426–438.
Wheeler, J., & Feynman, R. (1945). Interaction with the absorber as the mechanism of radiation. Reviews of Modern Physics, 17, 157–181.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank a number of referees whose comments have helped improve this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dowe, P. Action at a temporal distance in the best systems account. Euro Jnl Phil Sci 9, 35 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-019-0258-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-019-0258-4