Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T18:23:59.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Causation and Misconnections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Abstract

In this paper I show how the conserved quantity theory, or more generally the process theory of Wesley Salmon and myself, provides a sufficient condition in an analysis of causation. To do so I will show how it handles the problem of alleged ‘misconnections’. I show what the conserved quantity theory says about such cases, and why intuitions are not to be taken as sacrosanct.

Type
Wesley C. Salmon 1925-2001: A Symposium Honoring His Contributions to the Philosophy of Science
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dowe, Phil (1992), “Wesley Salmon’s Process Theory of Causality and the Conserved Quantity Theory”, Wesley Salmon’s Process Theory of Causality and the Conserved Quantity Theory 59:195216.Google Scholar
Dowe, Phil (2000), Physical Causation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehring, Douglas (2003), Review of Physical Causation by Phil Dowe, Mind 112(447): 529533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David (1986), Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, David (2000), “Causation as Influence”, Causation as Influence 97:182198.Google Scholar
Salmon, Wesley C. (1997), “Causality and Explanation: A Reply to Two Critiques”, Causality and Explanation: A Reply to Two Critiques 64:461477.Google Scholar
Salmon, Wesley C. (1998), Causality and Explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar