Skip to main content
Log in

Holism, Language Acquisition, and Algebraic Logic

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the first section of this paper I present a well known objection to meaning holism, according to which holism is inconsistent with natural language being learnable. Then I show that the objection fails if language acquisition includes stages of partial grasp of the meaning of at least some expressions, and I argue that standard model theoretic semantics cannot fully capture such stages. In the second section the above claims are supported through a review of current research into language acquisition. Finally, in the third section it is argued that contemporary algebraic logical systems consist in a superior formal vehicle through which to capture stages of partial grasp of meaning; this claim is supported by concrete examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Barret, M.: 1995, ‘Early Lexical Development’ in P. Fletcher and B. MacWhinney (eds.), The Handbook of Child Language, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, K.: 1998, ‘On the Perfectly General Nature of Instability in Meaning Holism’ Journal of Philosophy 95, 635–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J. L. and W. Demopoulos: 1996, ‘Elementary Propositions and Independence’ Notre Dame Journal of Symbolic Logic 37, 112–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Benthem, J.: 1994, Modal foundations for Predicate Logic. Report No. CSLI-94-191, CSLI, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgrami, A.: 1986, ‘Meaning, Holism and Use’ in E. Lepore (ed.), Truth and Interpretation, Basil Blackwell, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, N.: 1986, ‘Advertisement for a Semantics for Psychology’ in P. French, T. Uehling and H. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Vol. 10: Studies in the Philosophy of Mind, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, L.: 1993, The Transition from Infancy to Language-Acquiring The Power of Expression, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, L. and M. Lahey: 1978, Language Development and Language Disorders, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandom, R.: 1994, Making It Explicit, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, H. The Acquisition of Language, Pro-Ed, Austin.

  • Clark, E.: 1973, ‘What's in a Word? On The Child's Acquisition of Semantics in his First Language’ in E. Moore (ed.), Cognitive Development and The Acquisition of Language, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1984, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Clarendon, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1984a, ‘Reality without Reference’ in D. Davidson, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Clarendon, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1984b, ‘Truth and Meaning’ in D. Davidson, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Clarendon, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1984c, ‘Theories of Meaning and Learnable Language’ in D. Davidson, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Clarendon, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dresner, E.: 1998, ‘Formal Semantics and The Algebraic View of Meaning’ Doctoral Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.

  • Dresner, E.: 2000, ‘Boolean Algebra and Natural Language: A Measurement Theoretic Approach’ Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 4, 175–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dresner, E.: 2001, ‘Tarski's Restricted Form and Neale's Quantificational Treatment of Proper Names’ Linguistics and Philosophy 24, 405–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dresner, E.: 2002, ‘Measurement Theoretic Semantics and The Semantics of Necessity’ Synthese 130, 413–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dresner, E.: forthcoming, ‘Wittgenstein's Builder's and Perry's Objection to Sentence Priority’ Dialectica.

  • Dummett, M.: 1973, Frege: Philosophy of Language, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M.: 1976, ‘What is a Theory of Meaning? (II)’ in G. Evans and J. McDowell (eds.), Truth and Meaning: Essays in Semantics, pp. 67–137, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M.: 1991, The Logical Basis of Metaphysics, Harvard, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. and E. Lepore: 1992, Holism, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Givant, S. and R. MacKenzie (eds.): 1986, Alfred Tarski, Collected Papers, Birkhüuser, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golinkoff, R., C. Mervis, and K. Hirsh-Pasek: 1994, ‘Early Object Labels: The Case for a Developmental Lexical Principles Framework’ Journal of Child Language 21, 125–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkin, L., D. Monk, and A. Tarski: 1971 (1984), Cylindric Algebras Part I (Part II), North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkin, L.: 1973, ‘Internal Semantics and Algebraic Logic’ in H. Leblanc (ed.), Truth, Syntax and Modality, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krantz, D., D. Luce, P. Suppes, and A. Tversky: 1971–1989, Foundations of Measurement (Vol. 1–3), Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leblanc, H. (ed.): 1973, Truth, Syntax and Modality, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lormand, E.: 1996, ‘How to Be a Meaning Holist’. Journal of Philosophy 93, 51–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markman, E. and G. Wachtel: 1988, ‘Children's Use of Mutual Exclusivity to Constrain the Meaning of Words’ Cognitive Psychology 20, 121–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk, D. and R. Bonnet (eds.): 1989, Handbook of Boolean Algebras, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K.: 1985, Making Sense, The Acquisition of Shared Meaning, Academic Press, Orlando.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osherson, D., M. Stob, and S. Weinstein: 1985, Systems That Learn, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagin, P.: 1997, ‘Is Compositionality Compatible with Holism?’ Mind and Language 12, 11–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1975, ‘The Meaning of “Meaning”’ in H. Putnam, Mind Language and Reality. Philosophical Papers vol. 2, pp. 215–271, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V.: 1960, Word and Object, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V.: 1990, Pursuit of Truth, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A.: 1979, ‘Forcing in Model Theory’ in H. J. Keisler, S. Korner, W. A. J. Luxembirg, and A. D. Young (eds.), Selected Papers of Abraham Robinson, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E., C. Mervis, W. Gray, D. Johnson, and P. Boyes-Bream: 1976, ‘Basic Objects in Natural Categories’ Cognitive Psychology 8, 382–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoenfield, J.: 1967, Mathematical Logic, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A.: 1986, ‘A Simplified Formalization of Predicate Logic with Identity’ in S. Givant and R. MacKenzie (eds.), Alfred Tarski, Collected Papers, Birkhüuser, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Villier, J. and P. de Villier: 1978, Language Acquisition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dresner, E. Holism, Language Acquisition, and Algebraic Logic. Linguistics and Philosophy 25, 419–452 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020895422437

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020895422437

Keywords

Navigation