Skip to main content

Extraordinary: Reflections on Sample Representativeness

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Palgrave Handbook of Social Creativity Research

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture ((PASCC))

Abstract

In this chapter we reflect on a particular way of studying immensely high complexity, such as creativity, by investigating extraordinary achievers. The basis of our reflections are two empirical studies, one conducted in the area of haute cuisine, through interviewing top chefs, and the second conducted in the area of science, thorough interviewing Nobel Laureates. We explore why we feel that studying such extraordinary individuals can be more fruitful for better understanding creativity than trying to achieve an artificially manufactured sample that provides insights about the creative potential of the average individual. We outline the problems we see with the notion of representative samples from both conceptual as well as feasibility perspectives and offer an argument for studying the extraordinary instead.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: We have presented various aspects of our thinking about this topic as a series of developmental papers (Dörfler & Stierand, 2009; Stierand & Dörfler, 2011, 2012a, 2013) in the Research Methodology Special Interest Group (RM SIG) of the British Academy of Management (BAM) conference. We would like to thank members of the RM SIG as over the years they helped us clarify our thinking with their constructive criticism, comments and most of all questions for which we did not have satisfactory answers.

  2. 2.

    An additional difficulty here is that the Nobel Prize nominations are confidential for 50 years following the nominations. Furthermore, we can see that both in the case of Michelin stars as well as in the case of the Nobel Prize, the award will usually have significant delay compared to achieving the extraordinary level, so it could be expected that often there would be no recognisable difference between the comparison groups.

References

  • Bacon, S. F. (1620/2005). Novum organum: True directions concerning the interpretation of nature (e-book Ed.). Whitefish, MT: Kessinger Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calder, B. J., Phillips, L. W., & Tybout, A. M. (1982). The concept of external validity. The Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 240–244. https://doi.org/10.1086/208920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousins, J., O’Gorman, K., & Stierand, M. (2010). Molecular gastronomy: Cuisine innovation or modern day alchemy? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 22(3), 399–415. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596111011035972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csíkszentmihályi, M. (1997). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csíkszentmihályi, M. (2002). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience (2nd ed.). London: Rider.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörfler, V., & Ackermann, F. (2012). Understanding intuition: The case for two forms of intuition. Management Learning, 43(5), 545–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507611434686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dörfler, V., & Eden, C. (2014a). Research on intuition using intuition. In M. Sinclair (Ed.), Handbook of research methods on intuition (pp. 264–276). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörfler, V., & Eden, C. (2014b). Understanding ‘expert’ scientists: Implications for management and organization research. Paper presented at the AoM 2014: 74th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Philadelphia, PA. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2014.10732abstract

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dörfler, V., & Eden, C. (2017). Becoming a Nobel Laureate: Patterns of a journey to the highest level of expertise. Paper presented at the AoM 2017: 77th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, GA. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/319373590

  • Dörfler, V., & Stierand, M. (2009). Investigating the extraordinary. Paper presented at the BAM 2009: 23rd Annual Conference of the British Academy of Management, Brighton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eszterházy, P. (2006). Utazás a tizenhatos mélyére. Budapest, Hungary: Magvető.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1995). Leading minds: An anatomy of leadership. London: Harper Collins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1997). Extraordinary minds: Portraits of exceptional individuals and an examination of our extraordinariness. London: Phoenix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbert, M. (2006). Generalizing about uniqueness: An essay on an apparent paradox in the resource-based view. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(2), 124–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492606287793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbert, M., Ruigrok, W., & Wicki, B. (2008). What passes as a rigorous case study? Strategic Management Journal, 29(13), 1465–1474. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell, M. (2008). Outliers – The story of success. New York: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3(3), 430–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(72)90016-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebuda, I. (2014). Big C research–The big challenge? Reflections from research into eminent creativity in the light of the investment theory of creativity. Creativity: Theories-Research-Application, 1(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.15290/ctra.2014.01.01.03.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., Sproull, L. S., & Tamuz, M. (1991). Learning from samples of one or fewer. Organization Science, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1966/2002). The psychology of science: A reconnaissance. Chapel Hill, NC: Maurice Bassett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being (2nd ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1970/1994). Religions, values, and peak-experiences. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1971/1993). The farther reaches of human nature. London: Penguin Compass.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J. E., & Brinberg, D. (1983). External validity and the research process: A comment on the Calder/Lynch dialogue. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(1), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1086/208951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1861). Utilitarianism. In G. Williams (Ed.), Utilitarianism, on liberty, considerations on representative government, remarks on Bentham’s philosophy (pp. 1–67). London: Everyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polányi, M. (1962a/2002). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polányi, M. (1962b). Tacit knowing: Its bearing on some problems of philosophy. Reviews of Modern Physics, 34(4), 601–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polányi, M. (1966/1983). The tacit dimension. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scandura, T. A., & Williams, E. A. (2000). Research methodology in management: Current practices, trends, and implications for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1248–1264. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1999). Significant samples: The psychological study of eminent individuals. Psychological Methods, 4(4), 425–451. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.4.425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (2014). Significant samples – Not significance tests! The often overlooked solution to the replication problem. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(1), 11–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stierand, M. (2015). Developing creativity in practice: Explorations with World-Renowned Chefs. Management Learning, 46(5), 598–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507614560302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stierand, M., & Dörfler, V. (2011). Revising the notion of sample representativeness. Paper presented at the BAM 2011: 25th Annual Conference of the British Academy of Management, Birmingham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stierand, M., & Dörfler, V. (2012a). Iterative learning: A way of achieving generalizability in idiographic research? Paper presented at the BAM 2012: 26th Annual Meeting of the British Academy of Management, Cardiff, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stierand, M., & Dörfler, V. (2012b). Reflecting on a phenomenological study of creativity and innovation in haute cuisine. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 24(6), 946–957. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596111211247254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stierand, M., & Dörfler, V. (2013). Idiographic explanatory phenomenology: A contextualist approach to elucidating experiences. Paper presented at the BAM 2013: 27th Annual Conference of the British Academy of Management, Aintree Racecourse, Liverpool, UK. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268925834

  • Stierand, M., & Dörfler, V. (2016). The role of intuition in the creative process of expert chefs. Journal of Creative Behavior, 50(3), 178–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stierand, M., Dörfler, V., & MacBryde, J. (2014). Creativity and innovation in haute cuisine: Towards a systemic model. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stierand, M., & Lynch, P. (2008). The art of creating culinary innovations. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 8(4), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1057/thr.2008.28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taleb, N. N. (2008). The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76(2), 105–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wacker, J. G. (1998). A definition of theory: Research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00019-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 516–531. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1989.4308376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). What theory is not, theorizing is. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 385–390. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viktor Dörfler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dörfler, V., Stierand, M. (2019). Extraordinary: Reflections on Sample Representativeness. In: Lebuda, I., Glăveanu, V.P. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Social Creativity Research. Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95498-1_36

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics