Skip to main content
Log in

Environmental Individual Responsibility for Accumulated Consequences

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Climate change and many environmental problems are caused by the accumulated effects of repeated actions by multiple individuals. Instead of relying on collective responsibility, I argue for a non-atomistic individual responsibility towards such environmental problems, encompassing omissions, ways of life, and consequences mediated by other agents. I suggest that the degree of causal responsibility of the agent must be balanced with the degree of capacity-responsibility determined by the availability of doable alternatives. Then, the more an agent has powers as a group member, the more she is responsible to design the social structure and the infrastructures of the group towards sustainability. Finally, one can hold another agent responsible only if the accused is not in a vulnerable position and if she is capable to take reparative and adaptive actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. I use the feminine as gender neutral.

  2. This list of questions is inspired by Nancy Fraser who describes three abnormalities of justice with the questions What, Who and How, 2008.

  3. Attfield already suggested that responsibility can be mediated through the actions of others, spatial and temporal distances, uncertainty and diffusion. I use the word mediated in a more limited meaning, restricted to mediation by other agents.

References

  • Attfield, R. (2009). Mediated responsibilities, global warming and the scope of ethics. Journal of Social Philosophy,40(2), 225–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayart, J.-F. (1996). L’illusion identitaire. Paris: Librairie Arthème Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caney, S. (2005). Cosmopolitan justice, responsibility, and global climate change. Leiden Journal of International Law,18(4), 747–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corlett, J. A. (2001). Collective moral responsibility. Journal of Social Philosophy,32, 573–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cripps, E. (2013). Climate change and the moral agent, individual duties in and interdependent world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cullity, G. (2015). Acts, omissions, emissions. In Moss (Ed.), Climate change and justice (pp. 148–164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Droz, L. (2019). Transnational civil disobedience as a catalyst for sustainable democracy. In H. Takikawa (Ed.), Rule of Law and Democracy – 12th Kobe Lecture IVR Congress Kyoto 2018, ARSP, pp. 123–134.

  • Feinberg, J. (1970). Doing and deserving, essays in the theory of responsibility. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J., & Ravizza, M. (1998). Responsibility and control, a theory of moral responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, G. P. (1996). Blackwell companions to philosophy. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2008). Abnormal justice. Critical Inquiry,34(3), 393–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1993). The interpretation of cultures: selected essays. London: Fontana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazebrook, T. (2010). Myths of climate change: Deckchairs and development. In R. Irwin (Ed.), Climate change and philosophy, transformational possibilities (pp. 162–180). London: Continuum Studies in Philosophy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golding, M. P. (2005). Responsibility. In M. Golding & W. Edmundson (Eds.), The blackwell guide to the philosophy of law and legal theory (pp. 221–235). Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H. L. A. (1961). The concept of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H. L. A. (1968). Punishment and responsibility, essays in the philosophy of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslanger, S. (2015). Distinguished lecture: Social structure, narrative and explanation. Canadian Journal of Philosophy,45(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslanger, S. (2018). What is a social practice. The Royale Institute of Philosophy Supplement,82, 231–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiller, A. (2011). Climate change and individual responsibility. The Monist,94(3), 349–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jax, K., et al. (2013). Ecosystem services and ethics. Ecological Economics,93, 260–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, H. (1979). Das prinzip verantwortung: Versuch einer ethik für die technologische zivilisation. Frankfurt am Main: Insel Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, J. (2009). Individualized responsibility and climate change: “if climate protection becomes everyone’s responsibility, does it end up being no-one’s?”. Cosmopolitan Civil Societies Journal,1(3), 132–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research,8(3), 239–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutz, C. (2002). Responsibility. In J. L. Coleman, K. E. Himma, & S. J. Shapiro (Eds.), Oxford handbook of jurisprudence and philosophy of law (pp. 548–587), Oxford University Press.

  • Kutz, C. (2007). Causeless complicity. Criminal Law and Philosophy,1, 289–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larrère, C. (2014). Vulnérabilité et responsabilité: Un autre Jonas? Alter,22, 181–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawford-Smith, H. (2012). The feasibility of collectives’ actions. Australasian Journal of Philosophy,90(3), 453–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawford-Smith, H. (2016). Difference-making and individuals’ climate-related obligations. In H. Clare & D. Roser (Eds.), Climate justice in a non-ideal world (pp. 64–82). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maniates, M. F. (2001). Individualization: Plant a tree, buy a bike, save the world? Global Environmental Politics,1, 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, L. (1991). Metaphysical guilt and moral taint. In L. May & S. Hoffman (Eds.), Collective responsibility: Five decades of debate in theoretical and applied ethics (pp. 239–254). Savage: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGary, H. (1991). Morality and collective liability. In L. May & S. Hoffman (Eds.), Collective responsibility: Five decades of debate in theoretical and applied ethics (pp. 77–87). Savage: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2004). Holding nations responsible. Ethics,114, 240–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan-Knapp, C., & Goodman, C. (2015). Consequentialism, climate harm and individual obligations. Ethic Theory Moral Practice,18, 177–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkin, S. (2010). The positive deviant. London: Earthscan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Räthzel, N., & Uzzell, D. (2009). Changing relations in global environmental change. Global Environmental Change,19, 326–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiff, M. (2008). Terrorism, retribution, and collective responsibility. Social Theory and Practice,28(3), 442–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuel, S. (1997). Relationships and responsibilities. Philosophy & Public Affairs,26(3), 189–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, J. J., Brown, P. G., & Orr, C. J. (2016). Ethics in the anthropocene: A research agenda. The Anthropocene Review,3(3), 188–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shue, H. (1995). Avoiding necessity: Global warming, international fairness, and alternative energy. In I. Shapiro & W. DeCew (Eds.), Theory and practice, NOMOS XXXVII (pp. 239–264). New York: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shue, H. (1999). Global environment and international inequality. International Affairs,75(3), 531–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smiley, M. (2017). Collective responsibility. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford: The Metaphysics Research Lab.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, C. D. (2004). Common but differentiated responsibilities in international law. The American Journal of International Law,98, 276–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P. (1962). Freedom and resentment. In Gary, W. (Ed.) Proceedings of the British academy (vol. 48, pp. 1–25). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K.-C. (2015). Individual duties of climate justice under non-ideal conditions. In Moss (Ed.), Climate change and justice (pp. 129–147). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderheiden, S. (2011). Climate change and collective responsibility. In N. A. Vincent, et al. (Eds.), Moral responsibility library of ethics and applied philosophy (Vol. 27, pp. 201–217). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veyne, P. (1971). Comment on écrit l’histoire suivi de Foucault révolutionne l’histoire. Paris: Point Seuil « Histoire » .

    Google Scholar 

  • Virvidakis, S. (2014). Moral minimalism in the political realm. In Julien, D., Fassio, D., & Meylan, A. (Eds.), Liberamicorum. Geneva: University of Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (1977). Just and unjust wars. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (2010). Responsibility for justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Monbukagakusho (Japanese Government) Scholarship N.150559.

Funding

Funding was provided by Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Monbukagakusho (Japanese Government) Scholarship N.150559.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laÿna Droz.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Droz, L. Environmental Individual Responsibility for Accumulated Consequences. J Agric Environ Ethics 33, 111–125 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-019-09816-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-019-09816-w

Keywords

Navigation