Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-04T12:48:49.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clinical Guidelines and Policies: Can they Improve Emergency Department Pain Management?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

James Ducharme
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The prevalence of pain in patients presenting to Emergency Departments (ED) has been well documented by both Cordell and Johnston. Equally well documented has been the apparent failure to adequately control that pain. In 1990 Selbst found that patients with long bone fractures received little analgesia in the ED, and Ngai, et al., showed that the under-treatment of pain continued after discharge. In a prospective study, Ducharme and Barber found that up to one third of patients presented with severe pain and were often unrelieved at discharge. Even though specific patient subgroups appear to be at greater risk, all patients are potential victims of oligoanalgesia - the under-treatment of pain. Despite an ever increasing volume of research about pain in emergency medicine, dissemination of relevant information with widespread change in practice patterns has not been witnessed. Recent studies continue to affirm that pain management in the ED is suboptimal.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , Winter 2005 , pp. 783 - 790
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cordell, W. H., Keene, K. K., Giles, B. K. et al, “The High Prevalence of Pain in Emergency Medical Care,” American Journal of Emergency Medicine 20 (2002): 165–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, C. C., Gagnon, A. J., Fullerton, L. et al, “One-Week Survey of Pain Intensity on Admission to and Discharge from the Emergency Department: A Pilot Study,” Journal of Emergency Medicine 16 (1998): 377–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selbst, S. M., Clark, M., “Analgesic Use in the Emergency Department,” Annals of Emergency Medicine 19 (1990): 1010–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ngai, B. and Ducharme, J., “Documented Use of Analgesics in the Emergency Department and Upon Release of Patients with Extremity Fractures,” [letter] Academic Emergency Medicine 4 (1997): 1176–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ducharme, J. and Barber, C., “A Prospective Blinded Study on Emergency Pain Assessment and Therapy,” Journal of Emergency Medicine 13 (1995): 571–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. E. and Pendleton, J. M., “Oligoanalgesia in the Emergency Department,” American Journal of Emergency Medicine 7 (1989): 620–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, K. H., Sloan, E. P., Chen, C. C. et al, “Survey of Pain Etiology, Management Practices and Patient Satisfaction in Two Urban Emergency Departments,” Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine 4 (2002): 252–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbins, M., Thomas, H., O'Brien, M. A. et al, “Use of Systematic Reviews in the Development of New Provincial Public Health Policies in Ontario,” International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 20 (2004): 399–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, P. D., “Legal and Policy Considerations in using Clinical Practice Guidelines,” American Journal of Cardiology 80 (1997): 74H–79H.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Studdert, D. M., Mello, M. M., and Brennan, T. A., “Financial Conflicts of Interest in Physicians' Relationships with the Pharmaceutical Industry – Self-Regulation in the Shadow of Federal Prosecution,” N. Engl. J. Med. 351 (2004): 1891–1900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American College of Emergency Physicians, “Clinical Policy for Children Younger than Three Years Presenting to the Emergency Department with Fever,” Annals of Emergency Medicine 42 (2003): 530–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Academy of Pediatrics, “Diagnosis and Management of Acute Otitis Media,” Pediatrics 113 (2004): 1451–1465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ducharme, J., “Emergency Pain Management: A Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) Consensus Document,” Journal of Emergency Medicine 12 (1994): 855–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American College of Emergency Physicians, “Clinical Policy for the Initial Approach to Adults Presenting with a Chief Complaint of Chest Pain, with No History of Trauma,” Annals of Emergency Medicine 25 (1995): 274–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigder, H. N., Arai, D. A., Narasimhan, K. et al, “ACEP Chest Pain Policy: Emergency Physician Awareness,” Annals of Emergency Medicine 27 (1996): 606–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American College of Emergency Physicians, “Clinical Policy: Critical Issues in the Evaluation and Management of Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Acute Headache,” Annals of Emergency Medicine 39 (2002): 108–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American College of Emergency Physicians, Clinical Policy: “Critical Issues for the Initial Evaluation and Management of Patients Presenting with a Chief Complaint of Non-traumatic Acute Abdominal Pain,” Annals of Emergency Medicine 36 (2000): 406–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ducharme, J., “Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians Guidelines for the Acute Management of Migraine Headache,” Journal of Emergency Medicine 17 (1999): 137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beveridge, R., Clarke, B., Janes, L. et al, “Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale: Implementation Guidelines,” Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine 1, Supplement 3 (1999).Google Scholar
Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, “Standards, Intents, Examples and Scoring Questions for Pain Assessment and Management,” Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals (Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois: JCAHO Department of Standards, 1999): At 1–11.Google Scholar
Thomas, S. H. and Andruszkiewicz, L. M., “Ongoing Visual Analog Score Display Improves Emergency Department Pain Care,” Journal of Emergency Medicine 26 (2004): 389–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, R. M., “Physician Variability in Pain Management: Are the JCAHO Standards Enough?” Pain Medicine 4 (2003): 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, A. M., “A Process Approach to Improving Pain Management in the Emergency Department: Development and Evaluation,” Journal of Accident and Emergency Medicine 17 (2000): 185–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godwin, S. A., Caro, D. A., Wolf, S. J. et al, “Clinical Policy: Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in the Emergency Department,” Annals of Emergency Medicine 45 (2005): 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Innes, G., Murphy, M., Nijssen-Jordan, C. et al, “Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in the Emergency Department: Canadian Consensus Guidelines,” Journal of Emergency Medicine 17 (1999): 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Innes, , supra note 25.Google Scholar
Finder, J. M., “The Future of Practice Guidelines: Should they Constitute Conclusive Evidence of the Standard of Care?” Health Matrix Cleveland 10 (2000): 67–117.Google Scholar
Crane, M., “Managed Care 1999 – Clinical Guidelines: A Malpractice Safety Net?” Medical Economics 76 (1999): 236–243, at 239.Google Scholar
See Jacobson, , supra note 9, at 74H.Google Scholar
See Finder, , supra note 27, at 69.Google Scholar
Wolf, S. H., “Do Clinical Practice Guidelines Define Good Medical Care? The Need for Good Science and the Disclosure of Uncertainty when Defining ‘Best Practices,’” Chest 113 (1998): 166S–171S, at 167S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Jacobson, , supra note 9.Google Scholar
Ibid at 77H.Google Scholar
Wyatt, M., Underwood, M. R., Scheel, I. B. et al, “Back Pain and Health Policy Research: The What, Why, How, Who, and When,” Spine 29 (2004): E468–E475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassidy, J. D., Carroll, L. J., Cote, P., “The Saskatchewan Health and Back Pain Survey: The Prevalence of Low Back Pain and Related Disability in Saskatchewan Adults,” Spine 23 (1998): 1860–1866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbins, M., Cockerill, R., Barnsley, J., “Factors Affecting the Utilization of Systematic Reviews: A Study of Public Health Decision Makers,” International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 17 (2001): 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitson, A., Ahmed, L. B., Harvey, G. et al, “From Research to Practice: One Organizational Model for Promoting Research-Based Practice,” Journal of Advances in Nursing 23 (1996): 430–440, at 430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Dobbins, 2004, supra note 8.Google Scholar
See Dobbins, 2001, supra note 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, E. J., “How Well Do Clinical Practice Guidelines Guide Clinical Practice?” Annals of Emergency Medicine 40 (2002): 394–398, at 395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, D. A., Thomson, M. A., Oxman, A. D. et al, “Changing Physician Performance: A Systematic Review of the Effect of Continuing Medical Education Strategies,” JAMA 274 (1995): 700–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxman, A. D., Thomson, M. A., Davis, D. A. et al, “No Magic Bullets: A Systematic Review of 102 Trials of Interventions to Improve Professional Practice,” Canadian Medical Association Journal 153 (1995): 1423–1431.Google Scholar
Graham, I. D., Stiell, I. G., Laupacis, A. et al, “Emergency Physicians' Attitudes Toward and Use of Clinical Decision Rules for Radiography,” Academic Emergency Medicine 5 (1998): 134–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Jacobson, , supra note 9.Google Scholar
See Gallagher, , supra note 40.Google Scholar
Hunt, D. L., Haynes, R. B., Hanna, S. E. et al, “Effects of Computer-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems on Physician Performance and Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review,” JAMA 280 (1998): 1339–1346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigos, S. J., Bowyer, O., Braen, G., Acute Low Back Problems in Adults: Clinical Practice Guideline, Quick Reference Guide Number 14 AHC PR Pub No. 95–0643 (Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care and Policy Research, 1994).Google Scholar
Deyo, R. A., “Promises and Limitations of the Patient Outcome Research Teams: The Low-Back Pain Example,” Proceedings of the Association of American Physicians 107 (1995): 324–328.Google Scholar
See JCAHO, supra note 20.Google Scholar
Donovan, P. D., “Patient Attitudes to Postoperative Pain Relief,” Anesthesia and Intensive Care 11 (1983): 125–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Wyatt, , supra note 34.Google Scholar
Weinstein, S. M., Laux, L. F., Thornby, J. I. et al, “Medical Students' Attitudes Toward Pain and the Use of Opioid Analgesics: Implications for Changing Medical School Curriculum,” Southern Medical Journal 93 (2000): 472–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See JCAHO, supra note 20.Google Scholar
Benjamin, L. J., Swinson, G. I., Nagel, R. L., “Sickle Cell Anemia Day Hospital: An Approach for the Management of Uncomplicated Painful Crises,” Blood 95 (2000): 1130–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Wyatt, , supra note 34.Google Scholar
Institute of Medicine, Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program (Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1990).Google Scholar
See Finder, supra note 27.Google Scholar
McGinn, T. G., Guyatt, G. H., Wyer, P. C. et al, “Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: XXII: How to use Articles about Clinical Decision Rules (Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group),” JAMA 284 (2000): 79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar