Skip to main content
Log in

Commentary on “scientific limitations and ethical ramifications of a non-representative Human Genome Project: African American responses” (F. Jackson)

An American Indian perspective

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Utter, J. (1993) American Indians—Answers to Today’s Questions, National Woodlands Publishing Company, Michigan, p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The National Congress of American Indians. Resolution #SFE-97-042. Title: U.S. Abrogation or Violation of Indian Treaties via Biodiversity Convention, The National Congress of American Indians, 2010 Massachusetts Ave., NW, 2nd floor, Washington, DC 20036, USA.

  3. Through Indian Eyes—The Untold Story of Native American Peoples (1995), Reader’s Digest Association, Inc., p. 172.

  4. Personal communication on 3 April 1998 with Antonio G. Gonzales, U.N. Liaison, Information Office, International Indian Treaty Council, San Francisco, CA.

  5. Human Genome Diversity Project, Morrison Institute for Population and Resource Studies, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5020, Fax: 415-725-8244, E-mail: morrison@forsythe.stanford.edu (Cavalli-Sforza Lab: http:lotka.stanford.edu/)

  6. Vandana, S. (1997) Biopiracy: the Plunder of Nature and Knowledge, Between the Lines, Toronto, Ontario, pp. 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Through Indian Eyes—The Untold Story of Native American Peoples (1995), Reader’s Digest Association, Inc., p. 385.

  8. “Declaration of the Indigenous Peoples of the Western Hemisphere Regarding the Human Genome Diversity Project”, Treaty Council News, Spring 1995, pp. 12–13, (The “Declaration” was generated and undersigned by 18 indigenous organizations at a meeting held in Phoenix, Arizona, February 19, 1995.) For further information, contact: International Indian Treaty Council, Information Office, 54 Mint Street, Suite 400, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA.; Tel: 415/512-1501; Fax: 415/512-1507; e-mail: 〈iitc@igc.apc.org〉.

  9. The National Congress of American Indians. Resolution No. NV-93-118, Resolution Condemning the Human Genome Diversity Project, The National Congress of American Indians, 2010 Massachusetts Ave., NW, 2nd floor, Washington, DC 20036, USA.

  10. Dukepoo, F.C. (1998-in press) “Native American Perspectives on Genetic Patenting”, in: Religion, Science and Industry in Dialogue, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  11. North American Regional Committee—Human Genome Diversity Project Proposed Model Ethical Protocol for Collecting DNA Samples (1997), Houston Law Review 33: 1431–1473.

  12. Akwesasne Task Force on the Environment. Research Advisory Committee, Protocol for Review of Environmental and Scientific Research Proposals (1996), Akwesasne Task Force on the Environment, P.O. Box 992, Hogansburg, NY 13655, USA.

  13. Navajo IRB Handbook (in progress), Navajo Nation Division of Health, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Navajo IRB, P.O. Box 390, Window Rock, Arizona 86515, USA; Tel: 520-871-6650.

  14. National Dialogue on Genetics, Genetic Link: Establishing a Dialogue Between Ethnically Diverse Communities and Genetic Policy Makers, March 20–22, 1998, University of Maryland, University College, College Park, MD, USA.

  15. Meeting with Indigenous People of Canada and the United States Concerning the HGDP, January 23–25, 1998, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dr. Frank Dukepoo is an American Indian, a Hopi from northern Arizona, and a geneticist.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dukepoo, F.C. Commentary on “scientific limitations and ethical ramifications of a non-representative Human Genome Project: African American responses” (F. Jackson). SCI ENG ETHICS 4, 171–180 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-998-0047-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-998-0047-5

Keywords

Navigation