Abstract
The prominent, though not exclusive, role of basic needs strategies to attain ethically acceptable development goals raises the question of the ability of development agencies to find and employ basic needs strategies. The obligation to prevent severe human suffering leads to the obligation to employ basic needs strategies to attain basic needs goals. The history of failure by development agencies in finding and employing basic needs tools leads to a further obligation to cultivate bureaucratic environments which foster profound innovation. This requires not only new tools but also new bureaucratic behaviour. An understandable obstacle to simultaneously technological and bureaucratic innovation lies in the tension between “responsible behaviour” and “behaviour promoting fundamental change.” Since this tension is based on the unpredictability of creative change, a series of axioms and corollaries which reduce the unpredictability is given. They include: (1) an obligation to seek innovation; (2) a clear statement of basic needs goals and intent to use some basic needs tools; (3) increase in effective knowledge of the poor and their survival strategies; (4) bureaucratic learning flexibility; (5) participatory development and allied emphasis on sustainable resource technologies. The embodiment of these in the “learning” process approach is illustrated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amerling, Carl, et al. 1981.The Sondeo Report. Gainsville, FL: University of Florida, Institute for Food and Agricultural Science.
Botkin, James W., Mahadi Elmandjra, and Mircea Malitza. 1979.No Limits to Learning: Bridging the Human Gap. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Burns, Tom. 1969. Models, Images, and Myths. InFactors in the Transfer of Technology, edited by William H. Gruber and Donald G. Marquis. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Carner, George, and David Korten. 1982.People Centered Planning: The USAID/Philippines Experience. Washington, DC: NAASPA/AID.
Esman, Milton J., and Norman T. Uphoff. 1982.Local Organization and Rural Development: The State of the Art. Rural Oganizations Series #7. Rural Development Committee, Cornell University.
Gow, David D., and Jerry Van Sant. 1981Beyond the Rhetoric of Rural Development Participation: How Can It be Done? Washington, DC: Development Alternatives, Inc.
Gran, Guy. 1983.Development by People: Citizen Construction of a Just World. New York: Praeger.
Harwood, Richard. 1979Small farm development: understanding and improving farming systems in the humid tropics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Illich, Ivan. 1980. The New Frontier for Arrogance: Colonization of the Informal Sector,International Development Review 22 (2–3): 96–101.
Ingle, Marcus. 1982.Reaching the Poor Through Development Assistance: An Overview of Strategies and Techniques. Washington, DC: DPMC, USDA.
Johnson, R.D. 1972. The Internal Structure of Technology.The Sociology of Science, edited by Paul Halmos, pp. 117–130. Keele, Staffordshire: University of Keele.
Korten, David C. 1980. Community Organization and Rural Development: A Learning Process Approach.Public Administration Review 40(5): 480–511.
—. 1982.The Working Group as a Mechanism for Managing Bureaucratic Reorientation: Experience from the Philippines. Working Paper #4. Washington, DC: NAASPA.
Korten, Frances. 1982a.A Participatory Approach to Irrigation Development: Experience for the Philippines. Paper delivered at American Society for Public Adminstration Convention, Honolulu.
—. 1982b.Building National Capacity to Develop Water Users Associations. World Bank Staff Working Papers, No. 528. Washington: World Bank.
Lappé, Frances, et al. 1980.Aid as Obstacle. San Francisco: Institute for Food and Development Policy.
MacRae, Rod J., S.B. Hill, John Henning, and Guy R. Mehuys. 1989. Agricultural Science and Sustainable Agriculture: a Review of the Existing Scientific Barriers to Sustainable Food Production and Potential Solutions.Biological Agriculture and Horticulture, 6:173–219.
Roberts, Edward B. 1969. Entrepreneurship and Technology. InFactors in the Transfer of Technology, edited by William Gruber and Donald Marquis, pp. 219–237. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Ruttan, Vernon W. 1982.Agricultural Research Policy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Seastrunk, D.H. 1981. Technology Transfer Programs Designed to Assist Small-Scale and Part-Time Farmers in the United States.Transfering Technology for Small Scale Farming, edited by Noble Usherwoood, pp. 89–100. Madison: American Society of Agronomy.
Segal, Jerome. 1986. What is Development? InWorking Papers. College Park Maryland: University of Maryland Center for Philosophy and Public Policy.
Shields, Elizabeth. 1982.Social Development Management: An Annotated Bibliography. Washington, DC: NAASPA.
Tendler, Judith. 1975.Inside Foreign Aid. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
—. 1982.Rural Projects Through Urban Eyes: An Interpretation of World Bank's New-Style Rural Development Projects. World Bank Staff Working Paper No. 532. Washington, DC: World Bank.
U.S. National Research Council. 1989. Board on Agriculture,Investing In Research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
U.S. Office of Technology Assessment. 1981.Background Papers for Innovative Biological Technologies for Lesser Developed Countries. Washington, DC: Committee Print, House Foreign Affairs Committee.
Whyte, William F. 1981.Participatory Approaches to Agricultural Research and Development. Ithaca: Cornell University, Rural Development Committee.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dundon, S.J. Development aid: The moral obligation to innovation. J Agric Environ Ethics 4, 31–48 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02229145
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02229145