Skip to main content
Log in

Probability, disposition, and the inconsistency of attitudes and behavior

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inconsistency of attitudes and behavior is due to the probabilistic connection between responses or actions and the (not directly observable) dispositions on which they depend. Latent variable models provide criteria for recognizing when attitude and behavior depend on the same disposition. Statistical tests of such models and techniques of parameter estimation are described. The viewpoint proposed here and illustrated with empirical examples contrasts with the prevalent reliance on correlational models and methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alwin, Duane F.: 1973, ‘Making Inferences from Attitude-Behavior Correlations’, Sociometry 36, 253–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berelson, Bernard R., Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and McPhee, William N.: 1954, Voting, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, Bertram M.: 1950, Election Laws of the Forty-Eight States, Oceana Publications, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Donald T.: 1963, ‘Social Attitudes and Other Acquired Behavioral Dispositions’, in Sigmund Koch (ed.), Psychology: A Study of a Science, Vol. 6, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 94–172. Reprinted in part in Deutscher (1973), pp. 207–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, James S.: 1981, Longitudinal Data Analysis, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutscher, Irwin: 1973, What We Say/What We Do, Scott, Foresman, Glenview, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O. D.: 1984, Notes on Social Measurement: Historical and Critical, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O. D.: 1985a, ‘Some Models of Response Uncertainty for Panel Analysis’, Social Science Research 14, 126–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O. D.: 1985b, ‘New Light on the 16-Fold Table’, American Journal of Sociology 91, 88–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, James H.: 1977, ‘A World of Dispositions’, Synthese 34, 397–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, James H.: 1981, Scientific Knowledge, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, James H.: 1983, ‘Probabilistic Explanations’, PSA 1982, Vol. 2, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fienberg, Stephen E.: 1980, The Analysis of Cross-Classified Categorical Data, 2nd edn., MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, W. A.: 1958, ‘Intention and Voting Turnout’, American Political Science Review 52, 1030–1040. Reprinted with modifications in McPhee and Glaser (1962), pp. 225–239, and in Lazarsfeld, Pasanella, and Rosenberg (1972), pp. 367–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Leo A.: 1978, Analyzing Qualitative/Categorical Data, Abt Associates, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Leo A.: 1984, The Analysis of Cross-Classified Data Having Ordered Categories, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberman, Shelby J.: 1978–79, Analysis of Qualitative Data, Vols. 1 and 2, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagenaars, J. A.: 1978, ‘Latent Probability Models with Direct Effects between Indicators’, Quality and Quantity 12, 205–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Richard J.: 1981, ‘Attitudes and Behavior’, in Morris Rosenberg and Ralph H. Turner (eds.), Social Psychology: Sociological Perspectives, ch. 12, Basic Books, New York, pp. 347–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, Paul: 1981, ‘Aleatory Explanations’, Synthese 48, 225–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, S. and Mirer, T. W.: 1974, ‘The Simple Act of Voting’, American Political Science Review 68, 572–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, Patricia L. and Lazarsfeld, Paul F.: 1950, ‘Problems of Survey Analysis’, in R. K. Merton and P. F. Lazarsfeld (eds.), Continuities in Social Research, Free Press, Glencoe, Ill, pp. 133–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyfitz, Nathan: 1984, ‘Heterogeneity and Selection in Population Analysis,’ Research Paper No. 10, Statistics Canada, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Pasanella, Ann K., and Rosenberg, Morris (eds.): 1972, Continuities in the Language of Social Research, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liska, Allen E.: 1974, ‘Emergent Issues in the Attitude-Behavior Consistency Controversy’, American Sociological Review 39, 261–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, William J.: 1976, ‘The Concepts of Attitudes and Their Relations to Behaviors’, in H. W. Sinaiko and L. A. Broedling (eds.), Perspectives on Attitude Assessment: Surveys and Their Alternatives, Pendleton Publications, Champaign, Ill, pp. 7–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhee, William N., Anderson, B., and Milholland, H.: 1962, ‘Attitude Consistency,’ in McPhee and Glaser (1962), pp. 78–120.

  • McPhee, William N., and Glaser, William A. (eds.): 1962, Public Opinion and Congressional Elections, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perline, Richard, Wright, Benjamin D., and Wainer, Howard: 1979, ‘The Rasch Model as Additive Conjoint Measurement’, Applied Psychological Measurement 3, 237–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Railton, P.: 1981, ‘Probability, Explanation, Information’, Synthese 48, 233–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, Georg: 1960/1980, Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests, Danish Institute for Educational Research, Copenhagen. Expanded edition, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, Georg: 1966, ‘An Individualistic Approach to Item Analysis’, in Paul F. Lazarsfeld and Neil W. Henry (eds.), Readings in Mathematical Social Science, pp. 89–108. Reprinted, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Morris: 1979, ‘Disposition Concepts in Behavioral Science’, in R. K. Merton, J. S. Coleman, and P. H. Rossi (eds.), Qualitative and Quantitative Social Research, Free Press, New York, pp. 245–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuman, Howard and Johnson, Michael P.: 1976, ‘Attitudes and Behavior’, Annual Review of Sociology 2, 161–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuman, Howard and Presser, Stanley: 1981, Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, Patrick: 1970, A Probabilistic Theory of Causality, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Charles F. and Martin, Elizabeth (eds.): 1984, Surveying Subjective Phenomena, Vol. 1, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census: 1978, ‘Voting and Registration in the Election of November 1976’, Current Population Reports, Series P-20, No. 322, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number SES-8411359 and was carried out with facilities provided by the Social Process Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara. Magnus Stenbeck assisted with the statistical analysis. Data were obtained from published sources (as cited) and from the archives of the Roper Center (which supplied data tapes for the 1976 and 1980 CBS News/New York Times election surveys) and the Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research (which supplied data tapes for the 1948 Elmira Panel Study and the 1976 National Election Study). Neither the original investigators nor these agencies bear any responsibility for the accuracy of my work or for my interpretations of the data.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dudley Duncan, O. Probability, disposition, and the inconsistency of attitudes and behavior. Synthese 68, 65–98 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413967

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413967

Keywords

Navigation