Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Substitute Decision-Making for Adults with Intellectual Disabilities Living in Residential Care: Learning Through Experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Health Care Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the UK, current policies and services for people with mental disorders, including those with intellectual disabilities (ID), presume that these men and women can, do, and should, make decisions for themselves. The new Mental Capacity Act (England and Wales) 2005 (MCA) sets this presumption into statute, and codifies how decisions relating to health and welfare should be made for those adults judged unable to make one or more such decisions autonomously. The MCA uses a procedural checklist to guide this process of substitute decision-making. The personal experiences of providing direct support to seven men and women with ID living in residential care, however, showed that substitute decision-making took two forms, depending on the type of decision to be made. The first process, ‘strategic substitute decision-making’, paralleled the MCA’s legal and ethical framework, whilst the second process, ‘relational substitute decision-making’, was markedly different from these statutory procedures. In this setting, ‘relational substitute decision-making’ underpinned everyday personal and social interventions connected with residents’ daily living, and was situated within a framework of interpersonal and interdependent care relationships. The implications of these findings for residential services and the implementation of the MCA are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The personal experiences described in this paper are those of MD, and the paper has been written in the first person to best characterise these experiences. However, all three authors contributed to the writing of the paper.

References

  1. Beadle-Brown, J., Hutchinson, A., & Mansell, J. (2005). Care standards in homes for people with intellectual disabilities. Canterbury: Tizard Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benayaro, L., & Widdershoven, G. (2004). Competence in mental health care: A hermeneutic perspective. Health Care Analysis, 12(4), 295–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Caine, A., Hatton, C., & Emerson, E. (1998). Service provision. In E. Emerson, C. Hatton, J. Bromley, & A. Caine (Eds.), Clinical psychology and people with intellectual disabilities. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Charland, L. (1998). Is Mr. Spock mentally competent? Competence to consent and emotion. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology, 5(1), 67–86.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clegg, J. A., Standen, P. J., & Jones, G. (1996). Striking the balance: A grounded theory analysis of staff perspectives. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 35, 249–264.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection. (2006). Joint investigation into the provision of services for people with learning disabilities at Cornwall Partnership NHS Trust by the Commission for Social Care Inspectorate and the Healthcare Commission. London: Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection. (2007). Investigation into the service for people with learning disabilities provided by Sutton and Merton Primary Care Trust. London: Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cummins, R. A. (2005). Caregivers as managers of subjective wellbeing: A homeostatic perspective. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 18, 335–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Department for Constitutional Affairs. (2005) Mental Capacity Implementation Programme, PowerPoint Summary.

  10. Department of Health. (2001). Valuing people: A new strategy for learning disability for the 21st century. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Department of Health. (2003). Care homes for adults (18–65) and supplementary standards for care homes accommodating young people aged 16 and 17: National minimum standards, care homes regulations. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Department of Health. (2006). Our Health, Our Care, Our Say: A new direction for community services. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dunn, M. C., Clare, I. C. H., Holland, A. J. & Gunn, M. J. (in submission) Constructing and reconstructing ‘best interests’: An interpretative examination of substitute decision-making under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

  14. Emerson, E. (2005). Models of service delivery. In G. Grant, P. Goward, M. Richardson, & P. Ramcharan (Eds.), Learning disability: A life-cycle approach to valuing people. Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw Hill Educational.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Emerson, E., & Hatton, C. (1994). Moving out: Relocation from hospital to community. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Emerson, E., Hatton, C., Felce, D., & Murphy, G. H. (2001). Learning disabilities: The fundamental facts. London: The Mental Health Foundation (Foundation for People with Learning Disabilities).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fryers, T. (1993) Epidemiological thinking in mental retardation: Issues in taxonomy and population frequency. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 19, 97–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hawkins, P., & Shohet, R. (2000). Supervision in the helping professions, (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Higgs, R. (2004). The contribution of narrative ethics to issues of capacity in psychiatry. Health Care Analysis, 12(4), 307–316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. King’s Fund. (1980). An ordinary life: Comprehensive locally-based residential services for mentally handicapped people. London: King Edward’s Hospital Fund for London.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kittay, E. F. (2005). Dependency, difference and the global ethic of longterm care. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 13(4), 443–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Koehn, D. (1998). Rethinking feminist ethics: Care, trust and empathy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Maeckelberghe, E. (2004). Feminist ethic of care: A third alternative approach. Health Care Analysis, 12(4), 317–327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Martin, J. P. (1984). Hospitals in trouble. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  25. McLaren, J., & Bryson, S. E. (1987). Review of recent epidemiological studies of mental retardation: Prevalence, associated disorders, and etiology. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 92, 243–254.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mental Capacity Act 2005. London: The Stationery Office.

  27. Mental Capacity Act 2005 Draft Code of Practice. (2007). London: The Stationery Office.

  28. Noddings, N. (2003). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education, (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Perry, J., & Felce, D. (2003). Quality of life outcomes for people with intellectual disabilities living in staffed community housing services: A stratified random sample of statutory, voluntary and private agency provision. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 16, 11–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Roeleveld, N., Zielhuis, G. A., & Gabreels, F. (1997). The prevalence of mental retardation: A critical review of recent literature. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 39, 125–132.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sherwin, S. (1998) A relational approach to autonomy in health-care. In S. Sherwin (Ed.), The politics of women’s health: Exploring agency and autonomy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tan, J., Hope, T., & Stewart, A. (2003). Competence to refuse treatment in anorexia nervosa. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 26, 697–707.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Towell D. (Ed.), (1988). An ordinary life in practice: Developing comprehensive community-based services for people with learning disabilities. London: King Edward’s Hospital Fund for London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper forms part of an ongoing project on the legal, ethical and practical aspects of substitute decision-making for adults with mental incapacity in England and Wales. We would like to thank the other members of the project’s Steering Group: Dr Jennifer Clegg, Professor Michael Gunn, Dr John McMillan and, in particular, Dr Marcus Redley for their contributions to the ideas presented here. We would also like to acknowledge the support of the Wellcome Trust, which funds the project through a Biomedical Ethics Studentship (Grant Ref: GR077905AIA), awarded to MD.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael C. Dunn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dunn, M.C., Clare, I.C.H. & Holland, A.J. Substitute Decision-Making for Adults with Intellectual Disabilities Living in Residential Care: Learning Through Experience. Health Care Anal 16, 52–64 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-007-0053-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-007-0053-9

Keywords

Navigation