Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ethical and economic issues in the use of zero-emission vehicles as a component of an air-pollution mitigation strategy

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The air pollution generated by motor vehicles and by static sources is, in certain geographic areas, a very serious problem, a problem that exists because of a failure of the marketplace. To address this marketplace failure, the State of California has mandated that by 2003, 10% of the Light-Duty Vehicle Fleet (LDV) be composed of Zero-Emission Vehicles (ZEVs). However, the policy-making process that was utilized to generate the ZEV mandate was problematic and the resulting ZEV mandate is economically unsound. Moreover, an ethical analysis, based primarily upon the work of John Rawls, suggests that implementation of the California ZEV mandate is—in spite of the wide latitude that ought to be given to policy decision makers—unethical.

A more ethical and economically efficient approach to the pollution caused by marketplace failure is one that relies on market incentives and thereby achieves the desired improvement in air quality by appealing both to the self-interest of motorists and to those businesses that are directly or indirectly involved with the automobile industry. Such an approach would take better advantage of the creative forces of the market and improvements in technology over time and avoid the infringements on individual liberty and fairness embodied in the ZEV mandate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fleming, D. (1972) Roots of the conservation movement. Perspectives in American History 6: 7–91.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rawls, J. (1999) A theory of justice, rev. ed. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Calvert, J.G., Heywood, J.B., Sawyer, R.F. & Seinfeld, J.H. (1993) Achieving acceptable air quality: some reflections on controlling vehicle emissions. Science 261: 37–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lave, L.B. (1991) Regulation to civilize the automobile. Consumers’ Research, September, 15–19.

  5. Callan, S.J. & Thomas, S.M. (1996) Environmental economics and management. Irwin, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ross, M. (1998), Wheels of change: advances in automotive technology promise cleaner, more fuel efficient cars. Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy 13: 92–97.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lents, J.M. (1997) Electric vehicles are critical to healthful air. Business Forum 22: 41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  8. De Neufville, R, Connors, S.R., Field, F.R. & Marks, D. (1996) The electric car unplugged. Technology Review 99: 30–36.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lave, L.B., Hendrickson, C.T. & McMichael, F.C. (1995) Environmental implications of electric cars. Science 268: 993–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Suris, O. (1994) Electric cars also pollute, EPA study says. Wall Street Journal (April 5): B1.

  11. Environmental Protection Agency (1994) Fact sheet QMS-10. http://www.epa.gov/orcdizux/consumer/10-elec.txt, visited August 13, 1999.

  12. Krupnick, A.J. & Portney, P.R. (1991) Controlling urban air pollution: a benefit-cost assessment. Science 252: 522–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dixon, L. S. and S. Garber, S. (1996) California’s Ozone-Reduction Strategy for Light-Duty Vehicles. Rand, Santa Monica, CA. Avaiable on the internet: http://www.rand.org/publications/MRJMR695.1/MR695.1.fulltext.pdf.

  14. Kazimi, C. (1997) Valuing alternative fuel vehicles in southern California. American Economic Review 87: 265–271.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Beaton, S.P., Bishop, G.A., Zhang, T., Ashbaugh, L.L., Lawson, D.R. & Stedman, D.H. (1995) On-road vehicle emissions: regulations, costs and benefits. Science 268: 991–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McKenna, M. (1995) Electric avenue. National Review 47: 32–36.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gruenspecht, H. (2000) Zero emission vehicles: a dirty little secret. AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Policy Matters 00-16, http://www.aei.brookings.org/publications/policy/policy_00_16.asp, visited 12/18/01

  18. Lave, C.A. (1985) Speeding, coordination, and the 55 mph limit. American Economic Review 75: 1159–1164.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bedard, P. (2001) I looked into his eyes, and I saw a politician. Car and Driver 47: 23.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Taylor, C. (1991) The ethics of authenticity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Etzioni, A. (2000) Creating good communities and good societies, Contemporary Sociology, 29: 188–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Etzioni, A. (1996) The responsive community: a communitarian perspective, 1995 Presidential Address. American Sociological Review 61: 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Etzioni, A. (2000) Balancing privacy, public good, USA Today (April 27): 17A.

  24. Etzioni, A. (2000) ‘Golden middle’ ends conflicts, USA Today (August 21): 17A.

  25. Nicholson, L.J. (1997) Breakthroughs in automotive technology target pollution. The Philadelphia Inquirer (December 7): 1207.

  26. Wald, M.J. (1998) Cleaner cars—no magic required. New York Times (February 6): F1.

  27. Singer, S. (1998) Heading toward zero emissions. Machine Design 70: 68–72.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Krebs, M. (1999) Promise and pitfalls of fuel cells. New York Times (April 2): F1.

  29. Baxter, W. (1974) People or penguins: the case for optimal pollution, Columbia University Press, New York City.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bowie, N. (1990) Morality, money and motor cars, in Hoffman, W.M., Frederick, R. & Petry, E.S., Jr., eds. Business, Ethics, and the Environment: The Public Policy Debate, Quorum Books, Westport, CN.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Freeman, A.M., III (1998) The ethical basis of the economics view of the environment, in Van de Veer, D. & Pierce, C., eds. The Environmental Ethics and Policy Book, Wadsworth Pub. Co., Belmont, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Morgenson, G. & Eisenstadt, G. (1990) Profits are for rape and pillage. Forbes, (March 5): 94–99.

  33. Callicott, J.B. (1987) The conceptual foundations of the land ethic, in Callicott, J.B., ed. A sand county almanac: interpretive and critical essays, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hoffman, W.M. (1991) Business and environmental ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 1: 169–184.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Leopold A. (1981) The land ethic, a sand county almanac with other essays on conservation from round river. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sagoff, M. (1991) Zuckerman’s dilemma: a plea for environmental ethics. Hastings Center Report. 21: 32–40.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Steidlmeier, P. (1993) The morality of pollution permits. Environmental Ethics 15: 133–150.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Taylor, P.W. (1981) The ethics of respect for nature. Environmental Ethics 3: 197–218.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pigou, A.C. (1938) The economics of welfare. Macmillan and Company, London.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Allen, D.W. (2001) Social class, race and toxic releases in American counties, 1995. The Social Science Journal 38: 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Boone, C.G. & Modarres, A. (1999) Creating a toxic neighborhood in Los Angeles County. Urban Affairs Review 35: 163–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Boyce, J.K. (1994) Inequality as a cause of environmental degradation. Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Bullard, R.D. (1990) Dumping in Dixie: race, class, and quality, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Friedrich, M.J. (2000) Poor children subject to ‘environmental injustice.’ Journal of the American Medical Association 283: 3057–3058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hunter, L.M. (2000) The spatial association between U.S. immigrant residential concentration and environmental hazards. International Migration Review 34: 460–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Morello-Frosch, R., Pastor, M. & Porras, C. (2001) Who’s minding the air at your child’s school? Los Angeles Times, (June 3): M3.

  47. Sadd, J.L., Pastor, M., Boer, J.T. & Snyder, L.D. (1999) ‘Every breath you take…’ the demographics of toxic air release in southern California. Economic Development Quarterly 13: 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Szasz, A. & Meuser, M., (2000) Unintended, inexorable: the production of environmental inequalities in Santa Clara County, California. American Behavioral Scientist, 43: 602–632.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hodson, T., Englander, F. & Englander, V. (1995) Equity versus efficiency in pollution control. Paper presented to the Annual Conference Promoting Business Ethics, New York City.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Duvall Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duvall, T., Englander, F., Englander, V. et al. Ethical and economic issues in the use of zero-emission vehicles as a component of an air-pollution mitigation strategy. SCI ENG ETHICS 8, 561–578 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-002-0009-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-002-0009-2

Keywords

Navigation