Abstract
We conduct quantitative and qualitative analysis of 33 cases of internal and external whistleblowers wrongfully fired for reporting wrongdoing. Our results show external whistleblowers have less tenure with the organization, greater evidence of wrongdoing, and they tend to be more effective in changing organizational practices. External whistleblowers also experience more extensive retaliation than internal whistleblowers, and patterns of retaliation by management against the whistleblower vary depending on whether the whistleblower reports internally or externally. We discuss implications for organizations and whistleblowers, and we conclude that researchers need to develop different theoretical explanations of internal and external whistleblowing processes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Callahan, E. S. and T. M. Dworkin: 1994, ‘Who Blows the Whistle to the Media, and Why: Organizational Characteristics of Media Whistleblowers’, American Business Law Journal 32, 151–184.
Callahan, E. S. and T. M. Dworkin: 1992, ‘Do Good and Get Rich: Financial Incentives for Whistleblowing and the False Claims Act’, Villanova Law Review 37, 301–364.
Collins, D.: 1989, ‘Organizational Harm, Legal Condemnation and Stakeholder Retaliation: A Typology, Research Agenda and Application’, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 1–13.
Costanzo, P. R. and M. E. Shaw: 1966, ‘Conformity as a Function of Age Level’, Child Development 37, 967–974.
Dworkin, T. M.: 1992, ‘Legal Approaches to Whistle-Blowing’, in M. P. Miceli and J. P. Near (eds.), Blowing the Whistle (Lexington Books, New York), pp. 232–279.
Dworkin, T. M. and E. S. Callahan: 1993, ‘Employee Disclosures to the Media: When is a “Source” a “Sourcerer”?’, Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal 15, 357–397.
Dworkin, T. M. and E. S. Callahan: 1991, ‘Internal Whistleblowing: Protecting the Interests of the Employee, the Organization, and Society’, American Business Law Journal 29, 269–308.
Dworkin, T. M. and J. P. Near: 1990, ‘Whistleblower Statutes and Reality: Is There a Need for Realignment?’, Proceedings of the Pacific Southwest Business Law Association, 71–85.
Dworkin, T. M. and J. P. Near: 1987, ‘Whistleblowing Statutes: Are They Working?’, American Business Law Journal 25(2), 241–264.
Eisenhardt, K. M.: 1989, ‘Building Theories from Case Study Research’, Academy of Management Review 14, 532–550.
Elliston, F., J. Keenan, P. Lockhart and J. van Schaick: 1985, Whistleblowing (Praeger Publishers, New York).
Farrell, D.: 1983, ‘Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Neglect as Responses to Job Dissatisfaction: A Multidimensional Scaling Study’, Academy of Management Journal 26, 596–607.
Hirschman, A. O.: 1970, Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
Hollander, E. P.: 1958, ‘Conformity, Status, and Idiosyncrasy Credit’, Psychological Review 65, 117–127.
Keenan, J. P.: 1995, ‘Blowing the Whistle on Minor, Less Serious Forms of Fraud: A Study of Managerial-Level Differences’, paper presented at the International Association of Business and Society, Vienna, Austria.
Kohn, S. M. and M. D. Kohn: 1988, The Labor Lawyer's Guide to the Rights and Responsibilities of Employee Whistleblowers (Quorum Books, New York).
Kolarska, L. and H. Aldrich: 1980, ‘Exit, Voice, and Silence: Consumers' and Managers' Responses to Organizational Decline’, Organizational Studies 1, 41–58.
Miceli, M. P. and J. P. Near: 1992, Blowing the Whistle (Lexington Books, New York).
Miceli, M. P. and J. P. Near: 1988, ‘Retaliation against Role-prescribed Whistle-blowers: The Case of Internal Auditors’, paper presented at the national Academy of Management meeting, Anaheim, CA.
Miceli, M. P. and J. P. Near: 1985, ‘Characteristics of Organizational Climate and Perceived Wrongdoing Associated with Whistle-blowing Decisions’, Personnel Psychology 38, 525–544.
Miceli, M. P. and J. P. Near: 1984, ‘The Relationships among Beliefs, Organizational Position, and Whistle-blowing Status: A Discriminant Analysis’, Academy of Management Journal 27, 687–705.
Miceli, M. P., J. P. Near and C. R. Schwenk: 1991, ‘Who Blows the Whistle and Why?’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review 45, 113–130.
Near, J. P., M. S. Baucus and M. P. Miceli: 1993, ‘The Relationship between Values and Practice: Organizational Climates for Wrongdoing’, Administration & Society 25, 204–226.
Near, J. P., T. M. Dworkin and M. P. Miceli: 1993,‘Explaining the Whistle-blowing Process: Suggestions from Power Theory and Justice Theory’, Organization Science 4, 393–411.
Near, J. P. and M. P. Miceli: 1991, ‘How to Succeed as a Whistle-blower: Predictors of Effective Whistle-blowing’, unpublished working paper (Indiana University, Bloomington).
Near, J. P. and M. P. Miceli: 1987, ‘Whistleblowers in Organizations: Dissidents or Reformers?’ in B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior 9, 321–368 (JAI Press, Greenich, CT).
Near, J. P., K. C. Ryan and M. P. Miceli: 1995, ‘Results of a Human Resource Management “Experiment”: Whistle-blowing in the Federal Bureaucracy, 1980–1992’, Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings 1995 (Omnipress, Madison, WI).
O'Day, R.: 1972, ‘Intimidation Rituals: Reactions to Reform’, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 10, 373–386.
Parmerlee, M. A., J. P. Near and T. C. Jensen: 1982, ‘Correlates of Whistleblowers' Perceptions of Organizational Retaliation’, Administrative Science Quarterly 27, 17–34.
Perry, J. L.: 1990, ‘The Organizational Consequences of Whistleblowing’, unpublished manuscript available from the School of Public & Environmental Affairs, Indiana University.
Weinstein, D.: 1979, Bureaucratic Opposition (Pergamon Press, New York).
Westman, D P.: 1991, Whistleblowing: The Law of Retaliatory Discharge (BNA Books, Washington, D.C.).
Yin, R. K.: 1989, Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dworkin, T.M., Baucus, M.S. Internal vs. External Whistleblowers: A Comparison of Whistleblowering Processes. Journal of Business Ethics 17, 1281–1298 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005916210589
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005916210589