Skip to main content
Log in

Covariance, invariance, and the equivalence of frames

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper represents an attempt to clarify a number of long-standing issues concerning the nature and status of the special and general principles of relativity in particular and symmetry or invariance principles in general. An analysis of the active and passive interpretations of symmetry operations is offered. This analysis yields an evaluation of the old covariance-invariance issue. It also demonstrates that the passive interpretation, insofar as it is not trivial, is parasitic on the active picture. Finally, the analysis shows that grave difficulties lie in the way of any attempt to generalize the special principle of relativity in a manner like the one Einstein originally proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Einstein,Ideas and Opinions (Crown, New York, 1963), p. 270.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Einstein,Ann. Phys. 49, 769 (1916); English translation inThe Principle of Relativity, Perrett and Jeffrey, eds. (Dover, New York), pp. 111–164.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Holton, inThe Twentieth Century Sciences, Holton, ed. (Norton, New York, 1972), esp. pp. 365–366.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Goenner, inErnst Mach, Cohen and Seeger, eds. (D. Reidel, Dordrecht-Holland, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Hermann (ed.),Albert Einstein/Arnold Sommerfeld Briefwechsel (Schabe, Basel, 1968), pp. 102–103.

    Google Scholar 

  6. I. Ozsvath and E. Schücking,Ann. Phys. (U.S.) 55, 166 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Kretchmann,Ann. d. Phys. 53, 575 (1917).

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Havas,Rev. Mod. Phys. 36, 938 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Earman and M. Friedman, The nature and status of Newton's law of inertia, forthcoming inPhil. Sci.

  10. J. L. Anderson, inGravitation and Relativity, Chiu and Hoffmann, eds. (Benjamin, New York, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. L. Anderson, inPerspectives in Geometry and Relativity, Hoffmann, ed. (Indiana Univ. Press, 1966).

  12. J. L. Anderson,Principles of Relativity Physics (Academic Press, New York, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. L. Anderson,Gen. Rel. Grav. J. 2, 161 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. P. Wigner,Symmetries and Reflections (Indiana Univ. Press., 1967).

  15. A. Trautmann, inPerspectives in Geometry and Relativity, Hoffmann, ed. (Indiana Univ. Press, 1966).

  16. J. Rayski,Acta Phys. Polon. 33, 119 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Trautmann,Soviet Phys.—Uspekhi 9, 319 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. P. Wigner,Nuovo Cimento 3, 517 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. S. Wightman, inRelations de dispersion et particules élémentaires (Hermann, Paris, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  20. E. Fabri,Nuovo Cimento 14, 1130 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Earman, An attempt to add some direction to “the problem of the direction of time,” forthcoming inPhil. Sci.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Earman, J. Covariance, invariance, and the equivalence of frames. Found Phys 4, 267–289 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00712691

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00712691

Keywords

Navigation