^{page 147 note 1} Nor should it be forgotten that in the earlier article Dr. Hauser made a tempting though, as he admits, by no means proven suggestion to the effect that the originals of the reliefs of similar style in Tegel with the three Moirai, and with a Zeus and Hephaistos (from a ‘Nativity of Athena’) may have belonged to the same monument which he further surmises to have been the basis of the Altar of Zeus Soter, at the Peiraieus, noted both by Pliny and by Pausanias.

^{page 147 note 2} The early date, proposed by Mr. Phillips, Claude (Burlington Magazine, 1904, pp. 111–124)Google Scholar for this bronze must be abandoned, in the light of the arguments adduced by Dr. Bode, (Burlington Magazine, 1904 (March), p. 215)Google Scholar and by Michon, M. Éienne in Monuments Piot xii., 1905, pp. 159–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar. M. Michon, however, favours the Louis XIV. period rather than that of Louis XVI. proposed by Dr. Bode.