Skip to main content
Log in

Habermas and green political thought

Two roads diverging

  • Published:
Theory and Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

My principal ecocentric objection to Habermas's social and political theory has been that it is thoroughly human-centered in insisting “that the emancipation of human relations need not require or depend upon the emancipation of nature.” Footnote 1 Although Habermas has moved beyond the pessimism and utopianism of the first generation of Critical Theorists by providing the conceptual foundations of the practical and emancipatory cognitive interests, he has, as Whitebook points out, also “markedly altered the spirit of their project.” Footnote 2 Yet it is precisely the “spirit” of the early Frankfurt school theorists, namely, its critique of the dominant “imperialist” orientation toward the world (rather than its critique of a simplistically conceived idea of science) and its desire for the liberation of nature, that is most relevant to - and provides the most enduring Western Marxist link with - the ecocentric perspective of the radical Greens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Ibid., 140.

  2. Whitebook, “The Problem of Nature in Habermas,” 41.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eckersley, R. Habermas and green political thought. Theor Soc 19, 739–776 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00191896

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00191896

Keywords

Navigation