Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The uniqueness of biological self-organization: challenging the Darwinian paradigm

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biology & Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Here we discuss the challenge posed by self-organization to the Darwinian conception of evolution. As we point out, natural selection can only be the major creative agency in evolution if all or most of the adaptive complexity manifest in living organisms is built up over many generations by the cumulative selection of naturally occurring small, random mutations or variants, i.e., additive, incremental steps over an extended period of time. Biological self-organization—witnessed classically in the folding of a protein, or in the formation of the cell membrane—is a fundamentally different means of generating complexity. We agree that self-organizing systems may be fine-tuned by selection and that self-organization may be therefore considered a complementary mechanism to natural selection as a causal agency in the evolution of life. But we argue that if self-organization proves to be a common mechanism for the generation of adaptive order from the molecular to the organismic level, then this will greatly undermine the Darwinian claim that natural selection is the major creative agency in evolution. We also point out that although complex self-organizing systems are easy to create in the electronic realm of cellular automata, to date translating in silico simulations into real material structures that self-organize into complex forms from local interactions between their constituents has not proved easy. This suggests that self-organizing systems analogous to those utilized by biological systems are at least rare and may indeed represent, as pre-Darwinists believed, a unique ascending hierarchy of natural forms. Such a unique adaptive hierarchy would pose another major challenge to the current Darwinian view of evolution, as it would mean the basic forms of life are necessary features of the order of nature and that the major pathways of evolution are determined by physical law, or more specifically by the self-organizing properties of biomatter, rather than natural selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agassiz L (1874) Evolution and the permanence of type. Atlantic Monthly 33:92–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Anfinsen CB (1973) Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science 181:223–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Bak P (1996) How nature works: the science of self-organized criticality. Springer Verlag, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball P (1999) The self-made tapestry: pattern formation in nature. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth JV, Costantini G, Kern K (2005) Engineering atomic and molecular nanostructures at surfaces. Nature 237:671–679

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornens M (1991) Cell polarity: intrinsic or externally imposed? New Biol 3:627–636

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon C, Tooze J (1999) Introduction to protein structure. Garland Publishing Inc., NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks RA (2001) The relationship between matter and life. Nature 409:409–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Camazine S, Deneubourg J-L, Franks NR, Theraulaz G, Bonabeau E (2001) Self-organization in biological systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R (1844) Vestiges of the natural history of creation. John Churchill, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Chivian D, Robertson T, Bonneau R, Baker D (2003) Ab initio methods. In: Bourne E, Weissig H (eds) Structural informatics. Wiley, NY, pp 547–557

  • Cherdantseva EM, Cherdantsev VG (2006) Geometry and mechanics of teleost gastrulation and the formation of primary body axes. Int J Dev Biol 50:157–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway Morris S (2003) Life’s solution: inevitable humans in a lonely universe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Csete ME, Doyle JC (2002) Reverse engineering of biological complexity. Science 295:1164–1669

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1872) The origin of species. John Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1986) The blind watchmaker, Longman Scientific and Technical, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1996) Climbing mount improbable. W. W. Norton, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (2004) The ancestor’s tale. Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon T (1997) The symbolic species. Penguin Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Denton MJ, Marshall CJ (2001) The laws of form revisited. Nature 410:417

    Google Scholar 

  • Denton MJ, Marshall CJ, Legge M (2002) The protein folds as platonic forms: new support for the Pre-Darwinian conception of evolution by natural law. J Theor Biol 219:325–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett D (1995) Darwin’s dangerous idea. Simon and Schuster, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Depew DJ, Weber BH (1988) Consequences of nonequilibrium thermodynamics for the Darwinian tradition. In: Weber BH, Depew DJ, Smith JD (eds) Entropy, information and evolution: new perspectives on physical and biological evolution. MIT press, Cambridge, Mass, pp 316–354

  • Drexler KE (1986) Engines of creation. Anchor Books, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Driesch H (1929) The science and philosophy of the organism. A. and C. Black, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman GM (1987) Neural Darwinism. Basic Books, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Florey J (1969) Statistical mechanics of chain molecules. Wiley, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks NR, Wilby A, Silverman BW, Tofts C (1992) Self-organizing nest construction in ants: sophisticated building by blind bulldozing. Anim Behav 44:357–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale B (1972) The Darwinian concept of the struggle for existence. ISIS 63:321–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner R, Surani M, Solter D (2003) Epigenesis versus preformation during mammalian development. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 358:1313–1315

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleick J (1998) Chaos. Vintage Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Green JBA, Dominguez I, Davidson LA (2004) Self organization of vertebrate mesoderm based on simple boundary conditions. Dev Dynam 231:576–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Gribben J (2005) Deep simplicity. Penguin Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin BC (1994) How the leopard changed its spots. Charles Scribner, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ (1989) Wonderful life: the Burgess shale and the nature of history. W. W. Norton, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ (2002) The structure of evolutionary theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Haken H (1977) Synergetics: an introduction. Nonequilibrium phase transitions and self-organization in physics chemistry and biology. Springer Verlag, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Harold FM (2001) The way of the cell. Oxford University Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Holldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Harvard University Press, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Huttner WB, Schmidt AA (2002) Membrane curvature: a case of ‘endofeelin’. Trends Cell Biol 12:155–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson M (1997) Developmental cognitive neuroscience: an introduction. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalthoff K (1996) Analysis of biological development. McGraw-Hill, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith A (1992) Beyond modularity: a developmental perspective on cognitive science. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith A (2001) Why babies brains are not swiss army knives. In: Rose S, Rose H (eds) Alas Poor Darwin. Vintage, London, pp 144–156

  • Keller EF (2000) The century of the gene. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller R, Davidson L, Shook D (2003) How we are shaped: the biomechanics of gastrulation. Differentiation 7:171–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitano H (2002) Systems biology: a brief overview. Science 295:1662–1664

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner M, Gerhard J (1998) Evolvability. PNAS US 95:8420–8427

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner M, Mitchinson T (1986) Beyond self-assembly: from microtubules to morphogenesis. Cell 45:329–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman SA (1993) The origins of order. Oxford University Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman SA (2000) Investigations. Oxford University Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzweil R (2005) The singularity is near. Viking, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton CG (1989) Artificial life. Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehn J-M (2002) Towards self-organization and complex matter. Science 295:2400–2403

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy S (1993) The quest for a new creation. Penguin Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin R (1992) Complexity. Macmillan Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipson N, Pollack JB (2000) Automatic design and manufacture of robotic life forms. Nature 406:974–978

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J, Szathmary E (1999) The origins of life: from the birth of life to the origin of language. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1992) Taking a chance on evolution. New York Rev Books 14:34–36

  • Mayr E (2001) What evolution is. Basic Books, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller K (1999) Finding Darwin’s God. Cliff St Books, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Misteli T (2001) The concept of self-organization in cellular architecture. J Cell Biol 155:181–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchinson TJ (1992) Self-organization of polymer–motor systems in the cytoskeleton. Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 336:99–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Monod J (1972) Chance and necessity. Collins, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Morowitz HJ (2002) The emergence of everything. Oxford University Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Motosugi N, Bauer T, Polanski Z, Solter D, Hiiragi T (2005) Polarity of mouse embryo is established at blastocyst and is not prepatterned. Genes Dev 19:1081–1092

    Google Scholar 

  • Nedelec FJ, Surrey T, Maggs AC, Liebler S (1997) Self-organization of microtubules and motors. Nature 389:305–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman SA (1993) Is segmentation generic? BioEssays 15:277–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman SA (1994) Generic physical mechanisms of tissue morphogenesis: a common basis for development and evolution. J Evol Biol 7:467–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman SA (2002) Developmental mechanisms: putting genes in their place. Bioscience 27:97–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijhout HF (1990) Metaphors and the role of genes in development. Bioessays 12:441–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijhout FH (1999) When developmental pathways diverge. PNAS US 96:5348–5350

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen R (1849) On the nature of limbs. Jan Van Voorst, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen R (1866) Anatomy of vertebrates. Longmans and Green, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper K (1965) Conjectures and refutations. Harper Row, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Przytycka T, Aurora R, Rose GD (1999) A protein taxonomy based on secondary structure. Nat Struct Biol 6:672–682

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley M (1997) Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley M (2004) Nature via Nurture. Harper Perennial, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothemund WK (2006) Folding DNA to create nano shapes and patterns. Nature 440:297–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupke NA (1994) Richard Owen. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse M (2003) Darwin and design: does evolution have a purpose? Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell ES (1916) Form and function. John Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Salazar-Ciudad I, Newman SA, Sole RV (2001a) Phenotypic and dynamical transitions in model genetic networks I: emergence of patterns and genotype–phenotype relationships. Evol Dev 3:84–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Salazar-Ciudad I, Sole RV, Newman SA (2001b) Phenotypic and dynamical transitions in model genetic networks II: application to the evolution of segmentation mechanisms. Evol Dev 3:95–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Salthe SN (1993) Development in evolution:complexity and change in biology. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwann T (1847) Microscopical researches, English translation by Henry Smith, [original published in German in 1839]. Sydenham Society, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Shatz CJ (1996) Emergence of order in visual system development. PNAS US 93:602–608

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer SJ, Nicholson GI (1972) The fluid mosaic model of the cell membrane. Science 175:720–731

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltor D, Knowles BB (1999) Spatial and temporal control of maternal message. In: Russo VEA et al. (eds) Development. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 389–394

  • Srinivasan R, Rose GD (2002) Ab Initio prediction of protein structure using LINUS. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 47:489–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Strogatz SH (1994) Non linear dynamics and chaos. Perseus Books, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Surrey T, Nedelec F, Liebler S, Karsenti E (2001) Physical properties determining self-organization of motors and microtubules. Science 292:1167–1171

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinkaus JP (1984) Cells into organs. Prentice-Hall, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • von Dassow G, Meir E, Munro EM, Odell GM (2000) The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module. Nature 406:188–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Oudenaarden A, Theriot JA (1999) Symmetry breaking by actin polymerization in a model for cell motility. Nat Cell Biol 1:493–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington CH (1962) New patterns in genetics and development. Columbia University Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber B.H (1998) Emergence of life and biological selection from the perspective of complex systems dynamics. In: Van de Vijver G, Salthe SN, Delpos M (eds) Evolutionary systems: biological and epistemological perspectives on selection and self-organization. Kluwer, Dordrecth, pp 59–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber BH, Depew DJ (1996) Natural selection and self-organization: dynamical models as a clue to a new evolutionary synthesis. Biol Philos 11:33–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster G, Goodwin BC (1982) The origin of species: a structuralist approach. J Social Struct 5:15–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley EO, Brooks DR (1982) Victims of history: a non equilibrium approach to evolution. Syst Zool 31:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Weismann A (1902) The evolution theory. Edward Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicken JS (1986) Entropy and evolution: ground rules for discourse. Syst Zool 35:22–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicken JS (1987) Evolution, thermodynamics and information: extending the Darwinian paradigm. Oxford University Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams G (1966) Adaptation and natural selection. Oxford University Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitesides GM, Grzybowski B (2002) Self-assembly at all scales. Science 295:2418–2421

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram S (2002) A new kind of science. Wolfram Media Inc., Champaign Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolfson A (2000) Life without genes. Harper Collins, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates FE, Garfinkel AW, Yates GB (1987) Self-organizing systems: the emergence of order. Plenum Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Theology Faculty, Harris Manchester College, University of Oxford, OX4 1TD, Oxford, UK

    J. B. Edelmann

  2. Department of Biosciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Chak Shazad Campus, Plot 30, Sector H-8/1, Islamabad, Pakistan

    M. J. Denton

Authors
  1. J. B. Edelmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. J. Denton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. J. Denton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Edelmann, J.B., Denton, M.J. The uniqueness of biological self-organization: challenging the Darwinian paradigm. Biol Philos 22, 579–601 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-006-9055-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-006-9055-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation