Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Situating ‘Giving Voice to Values’: A Metatheoretical Evaluation of a New Approach to Business Ethics

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The evaluation of new theories and pedagogical approaches to business ethics is an essential task for ethicists. This is true not only for empirical and applied evaluation but also for metatheoretical evaluation. However, while there is increasing interest in the practical utility and empirical testing of ethical theories, there has been little systematic evaluation of how new theories relate to existing ones or what novel conceptual characteristics they might contribute. This paper aims to address this lack by discussing the role of metatheorising in assessing new approaches to ethics. The approach is illustrated through evaluating a new pedagogy and curriculum for ethics education called Giving Voice to Values (GVV). Our method involves identifying a number of metatheoretical lenses from existing reviews of ethical theories and applying these to examine GVV’s conceptual elements. Although GVV has been explicitly presented as a pedagogy and teaching curriculum, we argue that it has the potential to contribute significantly to the development of ethical theory. We discuss the general implications of this metatheoretical method of evaluation for new approaches to business ethics and for GVV and its future development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A more detailed exposition of these can be found in Gentile’s book “Giving Voice to Values: How to Speak Your Mind When You Know What’s Right” (Gentile 2010).

References

  • Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2004). Metatheory: Lessons from social identity research. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 8(2), 98–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adkins, C. P., Gentile, M. C., & Ingols, C. (2012). Teaching ‘‘how’’-not ‘‘whether’’-to manage with integrity: Undergraduate and MBA applications of the ‘‘Giving Voice to Values’’ curriculum. In C. Wankel & A. Stachowicz-Stanusch (Eds.), Management education for integrity: Ethically educating tomorrow’s business (pp. 107–135). Bingley, UK: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2004). Putting the ‘S’ back in corporate social responsibility: A multi-level theory of social change in organizations. SSRN eLibrary. doi:10.2139/ssrn.567842.

  • Alcaraz, J. M., & Thiruvattal, E. (2010). An interview with Manuel Escudero the United Nations’ principles for responsible management education: A global call for sustainability. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(3), 542–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alzola, M. (2011). The reconciliation project: Separation and integration in business ethics research. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(1), 19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., Gioia, D. A., Robinson, S. L., & Trevino, L. K. (2008). Reviewing organizational corruption. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 670–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsky, A. (2011). Investigating the effects of moral disengagement and participation on unethical work behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(1), 59–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, D. (2003). Management and business ethics: A critique and integration of ethical decision-making models. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 223–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1993). Postmodern ethics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. L., Bowie, N. E., & Arnold, D. G. (2009). Ethical theory and business (8th ed.). London: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, G. G., & Dyck, B. (2011). Conventional resource-based theory and its radical alternative: A less materialist-individualist approach to strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(1), 121–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, F. (1996). The muted conscience: Moral silence and the practice of ethics in business. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boatright, J. R. (2011). Ethics and the conduct of business (7th ed.). Melbourne: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, F. N., & Dunn, C. P. (1995). Business meta-ethics: An analysis of two theories. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5(3), 385–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brännmark, J. (2009). Ethical theories and the transparency condition. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 12(5), 449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, E. F. (2002). Business ethics: A helpful hybrid in search of integrity. Journal of Business Ethics, 37(2), 121–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K. S., Dutton, J. E., & Quinn, R. E. (Eds.). (2003). Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility. Business and Society, 38(3), 268–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (2000). Ethical challenges for business in the new millennium: Corporate social responsibility and models of management morality. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(1), 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S., Kornberger, M., & Rhodes, C. (2007). Business ethics as practice. British Journal of Management, 18(2), 107–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, J. (1998). Theorising the ethical organization. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(4), 621–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colomy, P. (1991). Metatheorizing in a postpositivist frame. Sociological Perspectives, 34(3), 269–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooperrider, D. L., & Srivastva, S. (2001). Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. In D. L. Cooperrider, J. Peter, F. Sorensen, T. F. Yaeger, & D. Whitney (Eds.), Appreciative inquiry: An emerging direction for organization development. Champaign, IL: Stipes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottone, R. R., & Ronald, E. C. (2000). Ethical decision-making models: A review of the literature. Journal of Counseling and Development: JCD, 78(3), 275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A. (1999). Are you ethical? Please tick □ yes or □ no: On researching ethics in business organisations. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(3), 237–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2007). Corporate social responsibility—Volume I: Theories and concepts of corporate social responsibility. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A., & Rothstein, H. (2006). The effects of the perceived behavioral integrity of managers on employee attitudes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 407–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGeorge, R. T. (2009). Business ethics (7th ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derry, R., & Green, R. M. (1989). Ethical theory in business ethics: A critical assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(7), 521–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detert, J. R., & Edmondson, A. C. (2011). Implicit voice theories: Taken-for-granted rules of self-censorship at work. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 461–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1994). Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrated social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 252–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1999). Ties that bind: A social contracts approach to business ethics. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., Werhane, P. H., & Van Zandt, J. D. (2008). Ethical issues in business: A philosophical approach. New York: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drumwright, M. E., & Murphy, P. E. (2004). How advertising practitioners view ethics: Moral muteness, moral myopia, and moral imagination. Journal of Advertising, 33(2), 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M. G. (2008). Evaluating integral metatheory. Journal of Integral Theory and Practice, 3(4), 61–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M. G. (2009). An integrative metatheory for organisational learning and sustainability. The Learning Organization, 16(3), 189–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M. G. (2010). Organisational transformation for sustainability: An integral metatheory. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M. G., Webb, D., Chappell, S., & Gentile, M. (2012). Giving Voice to Values: A new perspective on ethics in globalised organisational environments. In C. Wankel & S. Malleck (Eds.), Ethical models and applications of globalization: Culture, socio-political and economic perspectives (pp. 160–185). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egels-Zanden, N., & Sandberg, J. (2010). Distinctions in descriptive and instrumental stakeholder theory: A challenge for empirical research. Business Ethics: A European Review, 19(1), 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fesmire, S. (2003). John Dewey and moral imagination: Pragmatism in ethics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, C. M. L. A., & Lovell, A. (2009). Business ethics and values: Individual, corporate and international perspectives (3rd ed.). Harlow, England: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. L. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. (2010). Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Research Policy, 39(4), 495–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentile, M. C. (2008a, Summer). The 21st-century MBA. Strategy + Business, 51, 1–12.

  • Gentile, M. C. (2008b). Voicing values, finding answers. BizEd, July/August, 40–45.

  • Gentile, M. C. (2010). Giving Voice to Values: How to speak your mind when you know what’s right. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentile, M. C. (Ed.). (2011). Giving voice to values [Special Issue]. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 8(1), 305–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentile, M. C. (2012a). The Giving Voice to Values curriculum. http://www.babson.edu/faculty/teaching-learning/gvv/Pages/home.aspx. Accessed 20 Jan 2013.

  • Gentile, M. C. (2012b). Values-driven leadership development: Where we have been and where we could go. Organization Management Journal, 9(3), 188–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A. (2003). Business organization as instrument of societal responsibility. Organization, 10(3), 435–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. The Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gond, J. -P., & Matten, D. (2007). Rethinking the business-society interface: Beyond the functionalist trap No. 47-2007 ICCSR Research Paper Series, ISSN 1479-5124. Nottingham, UK: International Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility.

  • Gonzalez-Padron, T. (2012). A critique of Giving Voice to Values approach to business ethics education. Journal of Academic Ethics, 10(4), 251–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jr. (1993). Justification and application: Remarks on discourse ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. J., & May, D. R. (2011). Moral maturation and moral conation: A capacity approach to explaining moral thought and action. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 663–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. D., & Freeman, R. E. (2008). The impossibility of the separation thesis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(4), 541–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, J. (2008). Business ethics and moral motivation: A criminological perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4), 595–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kegley, J. A. K. (2011). The “ethical subject/agent” as “rational individual” but also as so much more. Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 25(1), 116–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelemen, M., & Peltonen, T. (2001). Ethics, morality and the subject: The contribution of Zygmunt Bauman and Michel Foucault to postmodern business ethics. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 17, 151–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidder, R. (1994). Shared values for a troubled world: Conversations with men and women of conscience. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. M. (2012). Public health ethics theory: Review and path to convergence. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 40(1), 85–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. W., & Grimes, A. J. (1999). Metatriangulation: Building theory from multiple paradigms. The Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 672–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luborsky, M. (1994). Identification and analysis of themes and patterns. In J. Gubrium & A. Sanakar (Eds.), Qualitative methods in aging research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclagan, P. (2003). Varieties of moral issue and dilemma: A framework for the analysis of case material in business ethics education. Journal of Business Ethics, 48(1), 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLennan, G. G. (2002). Quandaries in meta-theory: Against pluralism. Economy and Society, 31(3), 483–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P. (1992). Cliometric metatheory: The actuarial approach to empirical, history-based philosophy of science. Psychological Reports, 71(2), 339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melé, D. (2010). Practical wisdom in managerial decision making. The Journal of Management Development, 29(7/8), 637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (2011). Ethics and OR: Operationalising discourse ethics. European Journal of Operational Research, 210(1), 114–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nealon, J. T. (1998). Alterity politics: Ethics and performative subjectivity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, R. (2010). Practitioner-based theory building in organizational ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(3), 401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okhuysen, G., & Bonardi, J.-P. (2011). Editors comments: The challenges of building theory by combining lenses. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, J., & Bennis, W. (2009). What’s needed next: A culture of candor. Harvard Business Review, 87(6), 54–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton, W. F. (2007). A coherent metatheory for dynamic systems: Relational organicism–contextualism. Human Development, 50(2–3), 154–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardales, M. J. (2002). “So, how did you arrive at that decision?” Connecting moral imagination and moral judgement. Journal of Moral Education, 31(4), 423–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, B. L., Thorne, S. E., Canam, C., & Jillings, C. (2001). Meta-study of qualitative health research: A practical guide to meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perpich, D. (2008). The ethics of Emmanuel Levinas. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. (2004). Character strengths and virtues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrick, J., & Quinn, J. F. (1997). Management ethics: Integrity at work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentice, R. (2004). Teaching ethics, heuristics, and biases. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 1(1), 55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter-Theil, S. (2012). What does empirical research contribute to medical ethics? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 21(04), 425–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G. (1991). Metatheorizing in sociology. Toronto: Lexington Books.

  • Ritzer, G. (2001). Explorations in social theory: From metatheorizing to rationalisation. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G., Zhao, S., & Murphy, J. (2006). Metatheorizing in sociology: The basic parameters and the potential contributions of postmodernism. In J. H. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 113–134). New York: Springer.

  • Robertson, C. J., & Crittenden, W. F. (2003). Mapping moral philosophies: Strategic implications for multinational firms. Strategic Management Journal, 24(4), 385–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, B. (1975). A meta-theory for ethical theories. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 9(1), 12–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, M. A., Parks, L., Cavazos, D. E., & White, C. D. (2012). Business ethics as a required course: Investigating the factors impacting the decision to require ethics in the undergraduate business core curriculum. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(2), 174–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rychlak, J. F. (1968). A philosophy of science for personality theory. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, C. S., Carte, T. A., Jasperson, J., & Butler, B. S. (2003). Lessons learned from the trenches of metatriangulation research. Communications of AIS, 2003(11), 245–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharff, M. M. (2005). WorldCom: A failure of moral and ethical values. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 10(3), 35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. S. (2005). Universal moral values for corporate codes of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(1–2), 2–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekerka, L. E., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2007). Moral courage in the workplace: Moving to and from the desire and decision to act. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(2), 132–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, W. H., Barry, V. E., & Sansbury, G. (2009). Moral issues in business (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M. S. (2000). Ethical and fair work behaviour: A normative–empirical dialogue concerning ethics and justice. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(3), 187–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, A. (2010). Strategy as metatheory. Integral Review, 6(3), 57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spicer, A., Dunfee, T. W., & Bailey, W. J. (2004). Does national context matter in ethical decision making? An empirical test of integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 610–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suri, H., & Clarke, D. (2009). Advancements in research synthesis methods: From a methodologically inclusive perspective. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 395–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, D. L. (1999). Toward an integrative theory of business and society: A research strategy for corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 506–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K. (2000). Moral person and moral manager: How executives develop a reputation for ethical leadership. California Management Review, 42(4), 128–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2010). Managing business ethics (5th ed.). Danvers, MA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (1994). Business ethics/business ethics: One field or two? Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(2), 113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H., & Knudsen, C. (2003). Introduction: The need for meta-theoretical reflection in organization theory. In H. Tsoukas & C. Knudsen (Eds.), The oxford handbook of organization theory: Meta-theoretical perspectives (pp. 1–38). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tudway, R., & Pascal, A.-M. (2006). Beyond the ivory tower: From business aims to policy making. Public Administration & Development, 26(2), 99–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, L. (2003). Bioethics in a multicultural world: Medicine and morality in pluralistic settings. Health Care Analysis, 11(2), 99–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Laan, G., Van Ees, H., & Van Witteloostuijn, A. (2008). Corporate social and financial performance: An extended stakeholder theory, and empirical test with accounting measures. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(3), 299–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhezen, P. (2010). Giving voice in a culture of silence. From a culture of compliance to a culture of integrity. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(2), 187–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacker, J. G. (1998). A definition of theory: Research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, S. E. (2010). Toward a science of metatheory. Integral Review, 6(3), 73–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G. R., & Treviño, L. K. (1994). Normative and empirical business ethics: Separation, marriage of convenience, or marriage of necessity? Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(2), 129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wempe, B. (2004). On the use of the social contract model in business ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 13(4), 332–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werhane, P. H. (1994). The normative/descriptive distinction in methodologies of business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(2), 175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werhane, P. (1999). Moral imagination and management decision-making. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittier, N. C., Williams, S., & Dewett, T. C. (2006). Evaluating ethical decision-making models: A review and application. Society and Business Review, 1(3), 235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicks, A. C. (2010). Business ethics: a managerial approach. Boston: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittneben, B., Okereke, C., Banerjee, B., & Levy, D. (2009). Climate change and the emergence of new organizational landscapes. Organization Studies, 30(8), 917–919.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woo, C. (2009, 2010). Press about Giving Voice to Values. Retrieved September 20, 2010, from http://aspencbe.org/teaching/gvv/press.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Business School, The University of Western Australia, M261, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia

    Mark G. Edwards

  2. Department of Philosophy, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia

    Nin Kirkham

Authors
  1. Mark G. Edwards
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nin Kirkham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark G. Edwards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Edwards, M.G., Kirkham, N. Situating ‘Giving Voice to Values’: A Metatheoretical Evaluation of a New Approach to Business Ethics. J Bus Ethics 121, 477–495 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1738-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1738-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation