Abstract
The “top-down” and “bottom-up” approaches have been thought to exhaust the possibilities for doing cognitive neuroscience. We argue that neither approach is likely to succeed in providing a theory that enables us to understand how cognition is achieved in biological creatures like ourselves. We consider a promising third way of doing cognitive neuroscience, what might be called the “neural dynamic systems” approach, that construes cognitive neuroscience as an autonomous explanatory endeavor, aiming to characterize in its own terms the states and processes responsible for brain-based cognition. We sketch the basic motivation for the approach, describe a particular version of the approach, so-called ‘Dynamic Causal Modeling’ (DCM), and consider a concrete example of DCM. This third way, we argue, has the potential to avoid the problems that afflict the other two approaches.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bard J.B., Rhee S.J. (2004). Ontologies in biology: Design, applications, and future challenges. Nature Reviews: Genetics, 5: 213–222
Barlow H.B. (1972). Single units and sensation: A neuron doctrine for perceptual psychology? Perception, 1: 371–394
Bickle J. (1998). Psychoneural reduction: The new wave. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Buchel C., Friston K.J. (1997). Modulation of connectivity in visual pathways by attention: Cortical interactions evaluated with structural equation modeling and fMRI. Cerebral Cortex, 7: 768–778
Burchfield J. D. (1990). Lord Kelvin and the age of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Frisch K. J. (1967). The dance-language and orientation of bees. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Friston, K. J. (2003). Dynamic causal models. In R. S. J. Frackowiak, K. J. Friston, C. Firth, R. Dolan, C. J. Price, S. Zeki, J. Ashburner, W. D. Penny (Eds.), Human brain function (2nd ed.). Academic Press
Friston K.J., Buchel C. (2000). Attentional modulation of effective connectivity from V2 to V5/MT in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 97: 7591–7596
Friston K.J., Harrison L., Penny W. (2003). Dynamic causal modeling. Neuroimage 19: 1273–1302
Gallistel, R. C. (2006). The nature of learning and the functional architecture of the brain. In Q. Jing et al. (Eds.), Psychological science around the world, Vol. 1, Proceedings of the 28th international congress of psychology (pp. 63–71). Sussex: Psychology Press
Hamzei F., Rijntjes M., Dettmers C., Glauche V., Weiller C., Buchel C. (2003). The human action recognition system and its relationship to Broca’s area: An fMRI study. Neuroimage, 19: 637–644
Haugeland, J. (1978). The nature and plausibility of cognitivism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 215–226. Reprinted in J. Haugeland (Ed.), (1981) Mind design (pp. 243–281). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Hornik K., Stinchcombe M., White H. (1989). Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Networks, 2: 359–366
Judson H. (1980). The eighth day of creation. New York, Simon and Schuster
Kiebel, S. J., Stephan, K. E., Friston, K. J. (2006). Dynamic causal modeling for fMRI: Extending the generative model. Presented at the Rutgers Conference on Philosophical Foundations of Neuroimaging, April 2006. < http://www.philosophy. rutgers.edu/EVENTS/NEUROIMAGING/ kiebel1.pdf >
Li W., Piech V., Gilbert C. D. (2004). Perceptual learning and top-down influences in primary visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 7: 651–657
Lomber S.G., Payne B.R., Hildetag C.C., Rushmore J. (2002). Restoration of visual orienting into a cortically blind hemifield by reversible deactivation of posterior parietal cortex or the superior colliculus. Experimental Brain Research, 142: 463–474
Luck S.J., Chelazzi L., Hillyard S.A., Desimone R. (1997). Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 77: 24–42
Manjaly Z.M., Marshall J.C., Stephan K.E., Gurd J.M., Zilles K., Fink G.R. (2003). In search of the hidden: An fMRI study with implications for the study of patients with autism and with acquired brain injury. Neuroimage, 19: 674–683
Marr D. (1974). The computation of lightness by the primate retina. Vision Research, 14: 1377–1388
Marr D. (1982). Vision. New York, Freeman
Marr, D., Nishihara, K., (1978). Visual information processing: Artificial intelligence and the sensorium of sight. Technology Review, October, 28–48
Poldrack R.A., Parker D.S., Bilder R.M. (2006). How can neuroimaging relate cognitive and neural processes? Presented at the Rutgers Conference on Philosophical Foundations of Neuroimaging, April 2006. http://www.philosophy. rutgers.edu/EVENTS/NEUROIMAGING/poldrack.pdf
Sprague J. M. (1966). Interaction of cortex and superior colliculus in mediation of visually guided behavior in the cat. Science, 153: 1544–1547
van Gelder T. (1997). Dynamics and cognition. In Haugeland J. (eds). Mind design. Cambridge, MA MIT Press, pp. 421–450
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Egan, F., Matthews, R.J. Doing cognitive neuroscience: a third way. Synthese 153, 377–391 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9098-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9098-9