Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Achievements of the hermeneutic-phenomenological approach to natural science A comparison with constructivist sociology

  • Published:
Man and World Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The hermeneutic-phenomenological approach to the natural sciences has a special interest in the interpretive phases of these sciences and in the circumstances, cognitive and social, that lead to divergent as well as convergent interpretations. It tries to ascertain the role of the hermeneutic circle in research; and to this end it has developed, over the past three decades or so, a number of adaptations of hermeneutic and phenomenological concepts to processes of experimentation and theory-making. The purpose of the present essay is to show how appropriate these concepts are to an important current research program (solar neutrinos) and thus to point out what difference they make to our understanding of science as a whole. This goal is pursued by means of comparison. The program of social constructivism in natural science has produced alternative but parallel concepts, embodied in an alternative and parallel vocabulary. The contrast between this vocabulary and that of hermeneutics and phenomenology reveals, so I argue, the advantages of the latter. But actually it does more: It reveals as well the “pre-understanding” or “prejudgment” of science embedded in each approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amsterdamska, O. (1990). “Surely You Are Joking, Monsieur Latour!” Science, Technology and Human Values 15: 495–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apel, K-O. (1972). “The A Priori of Communication and the Foundation of the Humanities” Man and World 5(1):3–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apel, K-O. (1988) [1968], “Scientistics, Hermeneutics, Critique of Ideology: An Outline of a Theory of Science from an Epistemological-Anthropological Point of View,” in The Hermeneutics Reader, ed. K. Mueller-Vollmer, pp. 321–345. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbib, A.M. and M.B. Hesse. (1986). The Construction of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahcall, J.N. (1964). “Solar Neutrinos I. Theoretical.” Phys. Rev. Lett. 12: 300–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahcall, J.N. (1996). “Solar Neutrinos: Where We Are, Where We Are Going.” Astrophys. J. 467: 475–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahcall, J.N. (1996b). “Ray Davis: The Scientist and the Man.” Nuclear Physics B (Proc. Suppl.) 48: 281–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben David, J. (1981). “Sociology of Scientific Knowledge”, in The State of Sociology, ed. James F. Short Jr.} pp. 40–59. Beverly Hills, California: Sag

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, D. (1991) [1976]. Knowledge and Social Imagery, 2nd. ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H.M. (1985). Changing Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H.M. and T. Pinch. (1993). The Golem. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H.M. and S. Yearley. (1992). “Journey into Space,” in Science as Practice and Culture, pp. 369–389. See Pickering (1992).

  • Crease, Robert. (1993). The Play of Nature. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. (1985). “Holism and Hermeneutics,” in Hermeneutics and Praxis, pp. 227–247. See Hollinger (1985).

  • Eger, M. (1993). “Hermeneutics and the New Epic of Science,” in The Literature of Science: Perspectives on Popular Scientific Writing, ed. Murdo William McRae. Athens, Georgia, University of Georgia Press, pp. 187–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eger, M. (1993a). “Hermeneutics as an Approach to Science: Part II,” Science and Education: Contributions from the History, Philosophy and Sociology of Science 2:303–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eger, M. (forthcoming). “Language and the Double Hermeneutic in Natural Science,” in Hermeneutics and Science, pp. 289–305. See Fehér, Kiss and Ropolyi (forthcoming).

  • Fehér, M., Kiss, O., and Ropolyi L. eds (forthcoming). Hermeneutics and Science. Dordrecht, Kluwer.

  • FØllesdal, D. (1993). “Hermeneutics and Natural Science.” Lecture, First International Conference on Hermeneutics and Science, Veszprem, Hungary,6–9 September, 1993.

  • Fujimura, J. H. (1992). “Crafting Science: Standardized Packages, Boundary Objects, and 'Translation,'” in Science as Practice and Culture, pp. 168–211. See Pickering (1992).

  • Gadamer, H-G. 1975 [1960], Truth and Method, (trans. G. Barden and J. Cumming, from the 2nd [1965] ed.). New York: Crossroads.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H-G. (1985) [1977]. Philosophical Apprenticeships. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A. (1976). New Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R.N. (1988). Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glanz, J. (1996). “Added Weight for Neutrino Mass Claim.” Science 272: 812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grene, M. (1985). “Perception, Interpretation, and the Sciences: Toward a New Philosophy of Science,” in Evolution at a Crossroads: The New Biology and the New Philosophy of Science, eds. D.J. Depew and B.H. Weber. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984) [1981], The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1 (trans. T. McCarthy). Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heelan, P.A. (1967). “Horizon, Objectivity and Reality in the Physical Sciences.” Intern. Philo. Quarterly 7: 375–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heelan, P.A. (1972). “Toward a Hermeneutic of Natural Science.” J. British Society for Phenomenology 3: 252–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heelan, P.A. (1977). “Hermeneutics of Experimental Science in the Context of the Life-World,” in Interdisciplinary Phenomenology, pp. 7–50. See Ihde and Zaner (1977).

  • Heelan, P.A. (1983). Space Perception and the Philosophy of Science. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heelan, P. (1988). “Experiment and Theory: Constitution and Reality.” J. Philosophy 85: 515–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heelan, P.A. (1989). “Yes There is a Hermeneutical Philosophy of Natural Science: Reply to Markus.” Science in Context 3: 469–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heelan, P.A. (1989a). “After Experiment: Realism and Research”. Amer. Philo. Quarterly 26: 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heelan, P.A. (1991). “Hermeneutical Phenomenology and the Philosophy of Science,” in Gadamer and Hermeneutics, pp. 213–228. See Silverman (1991).

  • Heidegger, M. (1962) [1927]. Being and Time. (Trans. J. MacQuarrie and E. Robinson from the seventh edition of Zein und Zeit). San Francisco: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, M. (1980). Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science. Brighton, Sussex: Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollinger, R. ed. (1985). Hermeneutics and Praxis. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Note Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1970) [1936]. The Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, D. (1977). Experimental Phenomenology. New York: Putnam's Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, D. (1979). Technics and Praxis: A Philosophy of Technology. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, D. (1991). Instrumental Realism: The Interface Between Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Technology. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, D. and R.M. Zaner eds. (1977). Interdisciplinary Phenomenology. The Hague: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingarden, R. (1989) [1928]. Ontology of the Work of Art. (Trans. R. Meyer with J.T. Goldthwait, from the German edition of 1961.) Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E.F. (1983). A Feeling for the Organism. New York: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E.F. (1985). Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kisiel, T. (1973). “Scientific Discovery: Logical, Psychological or Hermeneutical?” in Explorations in Phenomenology, eds. David Carr and Edward S. Casey. The Hague: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kisiel, T. (1980). “Ars Inveniendi: A Classical Source for Contemporary Philosophy of Science.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 131–2: 130–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kisiel, T. (1983). “Scientific Discovery: The Larger Problem Situation.” New Ideas in Psychology 1:99–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, O. (1995). “Hermeneutic Roads to Commensurability,” 3rd International Conference on Hermeneutics and Science, Leusden, Holland, 12–15 July, 1995.

  • Kockelmans, J.J. (1968). Phenomenology and the Physical Sciences: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Physical Science. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kockelmans, J.J. (1985). Heidegger and Science. Washington, D.C.: Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology and University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kockelmans, J.J. (1993). Ideas for a Hermeneutic Phenomenology of the Natural Sciences. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kockelmans, J.J. and Kisiel, T.J. (1970). Phenomenology and the Natural Sciences. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.S. (1970) [1962]. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Second ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and Refutations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B. and S. Woolgar. (1979). Laboratory Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J-F. (1984) [1979]. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. (1987). “Why Is There No Hermeneutics of Natural Science?” Science in Context 1: 5–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mermin, D. (1996). “What's Wrong with this Sustaining Myth?” Phys. Today, March issue.

  • Pickering, A. ed. (1992). Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinch, T. (1986). Confronting Nature: The Sociology of Solar-Neutrino Detection. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1969). Knowing and Being ed. Marjorie Grene. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. and H. Prosch (1975). Meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghavan, R.S. (1995). “Solar Neutrinos–From Puzzle to Paradox,” Science 267: 45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, J. (1987). Knowledge and Power. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapere, D. (1984). Reason and the Search for Knowledge, Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S. and S. Schaffer. (1985). Leviathan and the Air-Pump, Princeton University Press.

  • Shimony, A. (1993). “Reality, Causality, and Closing the Circle,” in Search for a Naturalistic World View, v. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, H.J. ed. (1991). Gadamer and Hermeneutics, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfenstein L. and E.W. Beier. (1989). “Neutrino Oscillations and Solar Neutrinos.” Physics Today, July 1989 issue.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Staten Island, The City University of New York, Staten Island, NY, 10314, USA

    Martin Eger

Authors
  1. Martin Eger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eger, M. Achievements of the hermeneutic-phenomenological approach to natural science A comparison with constructivist sociology. Continental Philosophy Review 30, 343–367 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004215804045

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004215804045

Keywords

Search

Navigation