#ActuallyAutistic: Using Twitter to Construct Individual and Collective Identity Narratives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v16i2.2675Keywords:
Autism; neurodiversity; critical autism studies; TwitterAbstract
Employing Critical Autism Studies and Narrative Analysis, this project examines how autistic Twitter users engage in narrative meaning-making through social media. By analyzing the hashtags #ActuallyAutistic and #AskingAutistics this project broadly explores how individuals construct identity when lacking access to positive representations and identity communities. Answering the research question, “How do autistic people construct individual and collective identity narratives through Twitter?,” findings indicate that autistic Twitter users use their social media presence to build virtual learning communities. Common knowledge about autism is often oversimplified and highly medicalized. Therefore, autistics use Twitter to make meaning of their experiences that are not represented within cultural notions of what it means to be autistic. Autistic Twitter users reject medicalized narratives by contesting stereotypes, flipping negative narratives into positive stories, re-inscribing “deficiencies” as beneficial, and resisting rehabilitation and “cure.” Users do important social activist work by building strong autistic communities in ways that counter current negative representation, constructing positive self-affirming individual and community identities and resisting eugenic notions that autistic people are “less valuable.”
References
Atkinson, J. (2006). Analyzing resistance narratives at the North American anarchist gathering: A method for analyzing social justice alternative media. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 30(3), 251-272.
Barnett, J. P. (2014). Sexual citizenship on the Autism spectrum [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Windsor.
Benham, J. (2015). Proud to be autistic: Metaphorical construction and salience of cultural and personal identity in #StopCombatingMe [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Minnesota State University, Mankato. https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/etds/420/
Benton, A., Coppersmith, G., & Dredze, M. (2017). Ethical research protocols for social media health research. Proceedings of the First ACL Workshop on Ethics in Natural Language Processing (pp. 94-102). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://aclanthology.org/W17-1612.pdf
Berger, R. (2013). Introducing disability studies. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Bradford, S., & Clark, M. (2011). Stigma narratives: LGBT transitions and identities in Malta. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 16(2), 179-200.
Brown, M., Ray, R., Summers, E., & Fraistat, N. (2017). # SayHerName: A case study of intersectional social media activism. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(11), 1831-1846.
Busby, G., & Laviolette, P. (2006). Narratives in the net: Fiction and Cornish tourism. Cornish Studies, 14(1), 142-163.
Cole, K. L. (2021). Neuroqueering interpersonal communication theory: Listening to autistic object-orientations. Review of Communication, 21(3), 187-205.
Conrad, P., & Barker, K. K. (2010). The social construction of illness: Key insights and policy implications. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51(1_suppl), S67-S79.
Dahl, M. (1993). The role of the media in promoting images of disability-disability as metaphor: The evil crip. Canadian Journal of Communication, 18(1), 75-80.
Egner, J. E. (2017). A messy trajectory: From medical sociology to crip theory. In S. E. Green & S. N. Barnartt (Eds.), Sociology looking at disability: What did we know and when did we know it (pp. 159-192). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Egner, J. E. (2019a). “The disability rights community was never mine”: Neuroqueer disidentification. Gender & Society, 33(1), 123-147.
Egner, J. E. (2019b). “We love each other into meaning”: Queer disabled Tumblr users constructing identity narratives through love and anger. In S. E. Green & D. Loseke (Eds.), New narratives of disability (pp. 261-276). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Egner, J. E. (2019c). Hegemonic or queer? A comparative analysis of five LGBTQIA/disability intersectional social movement organizations. Humanity & Society, 43(2), 140-178.
Fletcher-Watson, S., Adams, J., Brook, K., Charman, T., Crane, L., Cusack, J., ... & Pellicano, E. (2019). Making the future together: Shaping autism research through meaningful participation. Autism, 23(4), 943-953.
Garland-Thomson, R. (2005). Feminist disability studies. Signs: Journal of women in Culture and Society, 30(2), 1557-1587.
Geiss, C. (2019). Connecting practical doings to cultural meanings: Exploring the work of moral mediators in human service organizations. Symbolic Interaction, 42(4), 539-563.
Geiss, C., & Egner, J. E. (2021). Examining organizational narratives: Public appeals of morality, emotions, and medical logic in the case of sex work for disabled clients. Sociological Inquiry. DOI: 10.1111/soin.12445
Gillespie-Lynch, K., Kapp, S. K., Brooks, P. J., Pickens, J., & Schwartzman, B. (2017). Whose expertise is it? Evidence for autistic adults as critical autism experts. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 438.
Goffman, I. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Simon & Schuster.
Hartnett, A. (2000). Escaping the 'Evil Avenger' and the 'Supercrip': Images of disability in popular television. The Irish Communications Review, 8, 21-29.
Hevey, D. (1993). From self-love to the picket line: Strategies for change in disability representation. Disability, Handicap & Society, 8(4), 423-429.
Hickman. (2017, December 29). 2017 – The year of autism Inspired TV. Huffington Post. https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/2017-the-year-of-autism-inspired-tv_uk_5a438bbee4b0d86c803c740e
Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. Sage.
Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2000). The self we live by: Narrative identity in a postmodern world, 23(4), 407-409.
Jivraj, J., Sacrey, L. A., Newton, A., Nicholas, D., & Zwaigenbaum, L. (2014). Assessing the influence of researcher–partner involvement on the process and outcomes of participatory research in autism spectrum disorder and neurodevelopmental disorders: A scoping review. Autism, 18(7), 782-793.
Karusala, N., Kumar, N., & Arriaga, R. (2019). # autism: Twitter as a lens to explore differences in autism awareness in India and the United States. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (pp.1-5). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287098.3287137
Loseke, D. R. (2007). The study of identity as cultural, institutional, organizational, and personal narratives: Theoretical and empirical integrations. The Sociological Quarterly, 48(4), 661-688.
Loseke, D. R. (2009). Examining emotion as discourse: Emotion codes and presidential speeches justifying war. The Sociological Quarterly, 50(3), 497-524.
Loseke, D. R. (2011). Thinking about social problems: An introduction to constructionist perspectives. Transaction Publishers.
Loseke, D. R. (2012). Empirical analysis of formula stories. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Varieties of narrative analysis (pp. 251-271). Sage.
Loseke, D. R. (2018). Narrative and the politics of meaning in a “post-fact” world. Social Problems, 65(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spx041
Loseke, D. R. (2019). Narrative productions of meanings: Exploring the work of stories in social life. Rowman & Littlefield.
MacLeod, A. (2019). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) as a tool for participatory research within Critical Autism Studies: A systematic review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 64, 49-62.
Melucci, A. (1995). The process of collective identity. Social Movements & Culture, 4, 41-63.
Mesquita, B., & Walker, B. (2003). Cultural differences in emotions: A context for interpreting emotional experiences. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 777–793
Nicolaidis, C., Raymaker, D., McDonald, K., Dern, S., Ashkenazy, E., Boiscliar, C., & Baggs, A. (2011) Collobaration strategies in nontradional community-based participatory research partnerships: Lessons from an academic-community partnership with autistic self-advocates. Progress in Community Health Partnerships, 5(2), 143-150
O’Callaghan, E., & Douglas, H. M. (2021). # MeToo online disclosures: A survivor-informed approach to open science practices and ethical use of social media data. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 505-525
O’Dell, L., Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, H., Ortega, F., Brownlow, C., & Orsini, M. (2016). Critical autism studies: exploring epistemic dialogues and intersections, challenging dominant understandings of autism. Disability & Society, 31(2), 166-179.
O’Toole, C. (2015). Fading scars: My queer disability history. Autonomous Press.
Oliver, M., & Barnes, C. (2012). The new politics of disablement. Macmillan International Higher Education.
Price, M. (2015). The bodymind problem and the possibilities of pain. Hypatia, 30(1), 268-284.
Polletta, F. (1998a). Contending stories: Narrative in social movements. Qualitative Sociology, 21(4), 419-446
Polletta, F. (1998b). “It was like a fever…”: Narrative and identity in social protest. Social Problems, 45(2), 137-159
Shapira, S., & Granek, L. (2019). Negotiating psychiatric cisgenderism-ableism in the transgender-autism nexus. Feminism & Psychology, 29(4), 494-513.
Silberman, S. (2017). Neurodiversity rewires conventional thinking about brains. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), Beginning with disability (pp. 51-52). Routledge.
Stearns, P. N., & Stearns, C. Z. (1985). Emotionology: Clarifying the history of emotions and emotional standards. The American Historical Review, 90(4), 813-836.
Stoll, L. C., & Egner, J. (2021). We must do better: Ableism and fatphobia in sociology. Sociology Compass, 15(4), e12869. DOI: 10.1111/soc4.12869
Strand, L. (2017). Charting relations between intersectionality theory and the neurodiversity paradigm. Disability Studies Quarterly, 37(2). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v37i2.5374
Townsend, L., & Wallace, C. (2017). The ethics of using social media data in research: A new framework. In K. Woodfield (Ed.), The ethics of online research (pp. 189-207). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Underberg, N. M., & Zorn, E. (2013). Digital ethnography: Anthropology, narrative, and new media. University of Texas Press.
Waltz, M. (2014). Worlds of autism: Across the spectrum of neurological difference. Disability & Society, 29(8), 1337-1338.
Welch, C., Cameron, D., Fitch, M., & Polatajko, H. (2020a). From “since” to “if”: Using blogs to explore an insider-informed framing of autism. Disability & Society. DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2020.1836479
Welch, C., Cameron, D., Fitch, M., & Polatajko, H. (2020b). Living in autistic bodies: Bloggers discuss movement control and arousal regulation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 43(22), 3159-3167.
Williams, M. L., Burnap, P., & Sloan, L. (2017). Towards an ethical framework for publishing Twitter data in social research: Taking into account users’ views, online context and algorithmic estimation. Sociology, 51(6), 1149-1168.
Woods, R., Milton, D., Arnold, L., & Graby, S. (2018). Redefining Critical Autism Studies: a more inclusive interpretation. Disability & Society, 33(6), 974-979.
Yergeau, M. (2018). Authoring autism: On rhetoric and neurological queerness. Duke University Press.
Young, S. (2014). I’m not your inspiration, thank you very much [Video]. TEDxSydney. https://www.ted.com/talks/stella_young_i_m_not_your_inspiration_thank_you_very_much?language=en
Zerubavel, E. (1996). Lumping and splitting: Notes on social classification. Sociological Forum, 11(3), 421-433.
Zolyomi, A., Jones, R., & Kaftan, T. (2020). # ActuallyAutistic Sense-Making on Twitter. The 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3373625.3418001
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Justine Egner
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles are published in Studies in Social Justice under the Creative Commons "Attribution/Non-Commercial/No Derivative Works" Canada licence.
The copyright for the articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles may be used, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings. The submission of a manuscript to Studies in Social Justice will be taken to mean that the author understands and agrees to the following:
- the manuscript represents original work not previously published;
- the manuscript is not being considered elsewhere for publication in the same language (publication elsewhere in an alternate language does not preclude acceptance of submission to Studies in Social Justice);
- appropriate written copyright permissions have been secured for republication of any copyrighted material contained in the manuscript;
- copyright for this article is retained by the author, with first publication rights granted to Studies in Social Justice;
- by virtue of its appearance in this open access journal, it is understood that the article is freely available for use, with proper attribution, for educational and other non-commercial purposes;
- reuse of the article for commercial purposes by anyone other than the author requires permission of the author;
- the author agrees to cite Studies in Social Justice as a source whenever h/she later republishes or reuses the article in other platforms.
