Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Relationships between various attitudes towards self-determination in health care with special reference to an advance directive.

Author information

Affiliations

  • 1. Umeå University, Sweden.
      Authors
    • Eisemann M 1
    (1 author)

Journal of Medical Ethics, 01 Feb 1999, 25(1):37-41
https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.25.1.37 PMID: 10070637 PMCID: PMC479166

Free full text in Europe PMC

Abstract 

Objectives

The subject of patient self-determination in health care has gained broad interest because of the increasing number of incompetent patients. In an attempt to solve the problems related to doctors' decision making in such circumstances, advance directives have been developed. The purpose of this study was to examine relationships between public attitudes towards patient autonomy and advance directives.

Subjects and main outcome measures

A stratified random sample of 600 adults in northern Sweden was surveyed by a questionnaire with a response rate of 78.2%. The subjects were asked about their wish for control of their health care, their concerns about health care, their treatment preferences in a life-threatening situation (both reversible and irreversible), and their attitudes towards the application of advance directives.

Results

Numerous relationships between various aspects of self-determination in health care (desire for control, fears of over-treatment, and choice of treatment level) in general and advance directives, in particular, were found. Those who wanted to have a say in their health care (about 94%) also mainly supported the use of an advance directive.

Conclusions

The fact that almost 30% of the respondents were undecided concerning their personal use of advance directives points to a lack of knowledge and to the necessity of education of the public on these issues.

Free full text 

Logo of jmedethLink to Publisher's site
J Med Ethics. 1999 Feb; 25(1): 37–41.
PMCID: PMC479166
PMID: 10070637

Relationships between various attitudes towards self-determination in health care with special reference to an advance directive.

M Eisemann and J Richter
Author information Copyright and License information Disclaimer

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The subject of patient self-determination in health care has gained broad interest because of the increasing number of incompetent patients. In an attempt to solve the problems related to doctors' decision making in such circumstances, advance directives have been developed. The purpose of this study was to examine relationships between public attitudes towards patient autonomy and advance directives. SUBJECTS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A stratified random sample of 600 adults in northern Sweden was surveyed by a questionnaire with a response rate of 78.2%. The subjects were asked about their wish for control of their health care, their concerns about health care, their treatment preferences in a life-threatening situation (both reversible and irreversible), and their attitudes towards the application of advance directives. RESULTS: Numerous relationships between various aspects of self-determination in health care (desire for control, fears of over-treatment, and choice of treatment level) in general and advance directives, in particular, were found. Those who wanted to have a say in their health care (about 94%) also mainly supported the use of an advance directive. CONCLUSIONS: The fact that almost 30% of the respondents were undecided concerning their personal use of advance directives points to a lack of knowledge and to the necessity of education of the public on these issues.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (818K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.
 
icon of scanned page 37
37
icon of scanned page 38
38
icon of scanned page 39
39
icon of scanned page 40
40
icon of scanned page 41
41
 

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Arcangelo V. Should age be a criterion for rationing health care? Nurs Forum. 1994 Jan-Mar;29(1):25–29. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Kapp MB. 'Ageism' and right to die litigation. Med Law. 1994;13(1-2):69–77. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Nuckton TJ, List ND. Age as a factor in critical care unit admissions. Arch Intern Med. 1995 May 22;155(10):1087–1092. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Emanuel LL, Barry MJ, Stoeckle JD, Ettelson LM, Emanuel EJ. Advance directives for medical care--a case for greater use. N Engl J Med. 1991 Mar 28;324(13):889–895. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Smedira NG, Evans BH, Grais LS, Cohen NH, Lo B, Cooke M, Schecter WP, Fink C, Epstein-Jaffe E, May C, et al. Withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. N Engl J Med. 1990 Feb 1;322(5):309–315. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Elder NC, Schneider FD, Zweig SC, Peters PG, Jr, Ely JW. Community attitudes and knowledge about advance care directives. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1992 Nov-Dec;5(6):565–572. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Kuuppelomäki M. Ethical decision making on starting terminal care in different health-care units. J Adv Nurs. 1993 Feb;18(2):276–280. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Edinger W, Smucker DR. Outpatients' attitudes regarding advance directives. J Fam Pract. 1992 Dec;35(6):650–653. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Sam M, Singer PA. Canadian outpatients and advance directives: poor knowledge and little experience but positive attitudes. CMAJ. 1993 May 1;148(9):1497–1502. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Broadwell AW, Boisaubin EV, Dunn JK, Engelhardt HT., Jr Advance directives on hospital admission: a survey of patient attitudes. South Med J. 1993 Feb;86(2):165–168. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Emanuel LL, Emanuel EJ. The Medical Directive. A new comprehensive advance care document. JAMA. 1989 Jun 9;261(22):3288–3293. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Kelner M, Bourgeault IL, Hébert PC, Dunn EV. Advance directives: the views of health care professionals. CMAJ. 1993 Apr 15;148(8):1331–1338. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Duffield P, Podzamsky JE. The completion of advance directives in primary care. J Fam Pract. 1996 Apr;42(4):378–384. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Molloy DW, Guyatt GH, Alemayehu E, McIlroy W, Willan A, Eisemann M, Abraham G, Basile J, Penington G, McMurdo ME, et al. Factors affecting physicians' decisions on caring for an incompetent elderly patient: an international study. CMAJ. 1991 Oct 15;145(8):947–952. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Thomasma DC. The ethical challenge of providing healthcare for the elderly. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1995 Spring;4(2):148–162. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • White BD, Singer PA, Siegler M. Continuing problems with patient self-determination. Am J Med Qual. 1993 Winter;8(4):187–193. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Davitt JK, Kaye LW. Supporting patient autonomy: decision making in home care. Soc Work. 1996 Jan;41(1):41–50. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Mower WR, Baraff LJ. Advance directives. Effect of type of directive on physicians' therapeutic decisions. Arch Intern Med. 1993 Feb 8;153(3):375–381. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Darziņs P, Molloy DW, Harrison C. Treatment for life-threatening illness. N Engl J Med. 1993 Sep 2;329(10):736–736. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Guyatt GH, Mitchell A, Molloy DW, Capretta R, Horsman J, Griffith L. Measuring patient and relative satisfaction with level or aggressiveness of care and involvement in care decisions in the context of life threatening illness. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Oct;48(10):1215–1224. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Molloy DW, Guyatt GH. A comprehensive health care directive in a home for the aged. CMAJ. 1991 Aug 15;145(4):307–311. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

Full text links 

Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.25.1.37

Read article for free, from open access legal sources, via Unpaywall: https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/25/1/37.full.pdfUnpaywall

Citations & impact 

Impact metrics

12
Citations
Jump to Citations

Citations of article over time

Article citations

Go to all (12) article citations

Similar Articles 

To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.