Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

There May be Strict Empirical Laws in Biology, after All

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper consists of four parts. Part 1 is an introduction. Part 2 evaluates arguments for the claim that there are no strict empirical laws in biology. I argue that there are two types of arguments for this claim and they are as follows: (1) Biological properties are multiply realized and they require complex processes. For this reason, it is almost impossible to formulate strict empirical laws in biology. (2) Generalizations in biology hold contingently but laws go beyond describing contingencies, so there cannot be strict laws in biology. I argue that both types of arguments fail. Part 3 considers some examples of biological laws in recent biological research and argues that they exemplify strict laws in biology. Part 4 considers the objection that the examples in part 3 may be strict laws but they are not distinctively biological laws. I argue that given a plausible account of what distinctively biological means, such laws are distinctively biological.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • R. Batterman (2000) ArticleTitleMultiple realizability and universality Brit. J. Philos. Sci. 51 115–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty J. 1982. What is wrong with the received view of evolutionary theory. In: Asquith P.D. and Giere R.N. (eds.), PSA 1980, Volume 2. Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, Michigan, pp. 397–426.

  • J. Beatty (1995) The evolutionary contingency thesis G. Wolters J. Lennox (Eds) The Biological Sciences: The Second Pittsburgh-Konstanz Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science University of Pittsburgh Press Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Brown (2001) ArticleTitleAll fired up: a universal metabolic rate Science 293 2191–2191

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Cartwright (1983) How the Laws of Physics Lie? Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Cartwright (1995) ArticleTitleCeteris paribus laws and socio-economic machines Monist 78 IssueID3 276–294

    Google Scholar 

  • L.G. Creary (1981) ArticleTitleCausal explanation and the reality of component forces Pac. Philos. Quart. 62 148–157

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Crick (1968) ArticleTitleThe origin of the genetic code J. Mol. Biol. 38 367–379 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-2836(68)90392-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P.S. Dodds P.S. Rothman D.H. Weitz (2001) ArticleTitleRe-examination of the ‘3/4-law’ of metabolism J. Theor. Biol. 209 IssueID1 9–27 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jtbi.2000.2238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Earman J. Roberts (1999) ArticleTitleCeteris paribus, there is no problem of provisos Synthese 118 439–478 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005106917477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Earman J. Roberts S. Smith (2002) ArticleTitleCeteris paribus, lost Erkenntnis 57 IssueID3 281–301

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Elgin (2003) ArticleTitleBiology and a priori laws Philos. Sci. 70 IssueID5 1380–1389 Occurrence Handle10.1086/377415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgin M. 2004. Special sciences and ceteris paribus laws. Forthcoming in Philos. Writings No. 27(Autumn).

  • B.J. Enquist J.H. Brown G.B. West (1998) ArticleTitleAllometric scaling of plant energetics and population density Nature 395 163–165 Occurrence Handle10.1038/25977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Fodor (1991) ArticleTitleYou can fool some of the people all of the time, everything else being equal; Hedged laws and psychological explanations Mind 100 19–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster M. 1988a. The confirmation of common component forces. In: Fine A. and Leplin J. (eds.), PSA 1988, Volume 1. Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, Michigan, pp. 3–9.

  • M.R. Forster (1988b) ArticleTitleUnification, explanation, and the composition of causes in Newtonian mechanics Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 19 55–101

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Giere (1984) Understanding Science CBS Collage Publishing New York

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Giere (1999) Science Without Laws The University of Chicago Press Chicago and London

    Google Scholar 

  • J.F. Gillooly J.H. Brown G.B. West V.M. Savage E.L. Charnov (2001) ArticleTitleEffects of size and temperature on metabolic rate Science 293 2248–2251 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.1061967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Hausman (1992) The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Kim (1992) ArticleTitleMultiple realization and the metaphysics of reduction Philos. Phenomen. Res. 52 IssueID1 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Mitchell (1997) ArticleTitlePragmatic laws Philos. Sci. 64 468–479 Occurrence Handle10.1086/392623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Mitchell (2000) ArticleTitleDimensions of scientific law Philos. Sci. 67 242–265 Occurrence Handle10.1086/392774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Mitchell (2002) ArticleTitleBiological contingency and laws Erkenntnis 57 IssueID3 329–350 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1021530311109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Mitchell (2003) Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism Cambridge University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Pietroski G. Rey (1995) ArticleTitleWhen other things aren’t equal: saving ceteris paribus laws from vacuity Brit. J. Philos. Sci. 46 81–110

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Rosenberg (1994) Instrumental Biology, or the Disunity of Science The University of Chicago Press Chicago and London

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Rosenberg (2001) ArticleTitleOn multiple realization and the special sciences J. Philos. XCVIII IssueID7 365–373

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Ruse (1970) ArticleTitleAre there laws in biology Aust. J. Philos. 48 234–246

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Schiffer (1991) ArticleTitleCeteris paribus laws Mind 100 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • L.A. Shapiro (2000) ArticleTitleMultiple realizations J. Philos. 97 IssueID12 635–654

    Google Scholar 

  • J.J.C. Smart (1963) Philosophy and Scientific Realism Routledge & Kegan Paul London

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Sober (1997) ArticleTitleTwo outbreak of lawlessness in resent philosophy of biology Philos. Sci. 64 458–467 Occurrence Handle10.1086/392622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B.C. VanFraassen (1980) The Scientific Image Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • B.C. VanFraassen (1989) Laws and Symmetry Oxford University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • K.C. Waters (1998) ArticleTitleCausal regularities in the biological world of contingent distributions Biol. Philos. 13 5–36 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1006572017907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G.B. West J.H. Brown B.J. Enquist (1997) ArticleTitleA general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology Science 276 122–126 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.276.5309.122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G.B. West J.H. Brown B.J. Enquist (1999) ArticleTitleThe fourth dimension of life: fractal geometry and allometric scaling of organisms Science 284 1677–1679 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.284.5420.1677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Whitfield (2001) ArticleTitleAll creatures great and small Nature 413 342–344

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Woodward (2000) ArticleTitleExplanation and invariance in the special sciences Brit. J. Philos. Sci. 51 IssueID2 197–254

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Woodward (2001) ArticleTitleLaw and explanation in biology: invariance is the kind of stability that matters Philos. Sci. 68 IssueID1 1–20 Occurrence Handle10.1086/392863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Woodward (2002) ArticleTitleThere is no such thing as a ceteris paribus law Erkenntnis 57 IssueID3 303–328 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1021578127039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Woodward (2003) Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation Oxford University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Muğla University, Mehmet Elgin, Posta Kutusu 69, 48000, Mugla/Turkey

    Mehmet Elgin

Authors
  1. Mehmet Elgin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Elgin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elgin, M. There May be Strict Empirical Laws in Biology, after All. Biol Philos 21, 119–134 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-005-3177-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-005-3177-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation