Abstract
The importance of Morality Education (ME) is globally recognized. Effectiveness of such programs necessitates that due consideration be given to sociocultural factors, which consist of enablers and potential barriers. Several research work have been conducted in this specific domain, highlighting its importance in numerous aspects of adolescents’ lives. This calls to the need to integrate ME in lives of school-aged adolescents from a multicultural background and socioeconomically deprived regions. This small-scale intervention’s aim was to investigate the perspectives concerning ME, taking into close consideration the sociocultural factors, constituting of enablers and potential barriers. The study makes use of a qualitative approach to research conducted in Mauritius, a developing country with a significantly multicultural population and where ME is rarely and properly addressed to students, despite changes in behaviors and mindset of the country’s adolescents. The sample was selected through purposive sampling and the study consisted of semi-structured interviews conducted, with study participants, comprising of teachers, students and parents. Students came from diverse backgrounds and socioeconomically deprived areas. The interview transcripts revealed that enabling factors were perceived as the role of external factors, integrating family members, meeting special needs, societal contribution, personal development, enrichment of knowledge and values and responsibility and consciousness. The potential barriers were perceived as resistance from teachers and students and technological advances. Generation gap was found as both an enabling factor and a potential barrier. The findings have implications for the design and implementation of school-based ME within a multicultural context, paving the way for related larger scales studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkinson, Kaye, Peter Schattner, and Stephen Margolis. 2003. Rural secondary school students living in a small community: Their attitudes, beliefs and perceptions towards general practice. Australian Journal of Rural Health 11 (2): 73–80.
Bishop, Emily. 2011. I’m not a real-risk taker: Moral identity construction and sexual risk perception among a group of young rural Tasmanians. Journal of Sex Education Sexuality, Society and Learning 11 (4): 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2011.595238.
Cohen, Louis, Lawrence Manion, and Keith Morrison. 2007. Research methods in education. 6th ed. New York: Routledge.
de Visser, Richard, Anthony Smith, Chris Rissel, Juliet Richters, and Andrew Grulich. 2003. Sex in Australia: Safer sex and condom use among a representative sample of Australian adults. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 27: 223–229.
Dinama, Baamphatlha. 2012. The path so far: Introducing moral education in Botswana senior secondary schools. Journal of Scientific Research in Education 5 (2): 100–108.
Dewey, John. 1902. The child and the curriculum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Godswill, James. 2012. Education and sexuality: towards addressing adolescents, reproductive health needs in nigeria. Current Research Journal of Social Sciences. Vol.4, Issue 4.
Grundy, Shirley. 1998. The curriculum and teaching. E. Hatton ed. Understanding teaching – Curriculum and the social context of schooling, pp., 27-37. Sydney: Harcourt Brace.
Hald, Gert, and Teguh Mulya. 2013. Pornography consumption and non-marital sexual behavior in a sample of young Indonesian University student. An International Journal for Research, Intervention and Care 15 (8): 981–996. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2013.802013.
Hansen, David. 2001. Teaching as a moral activity. V. Richardson ed. Handbook of research on teaching: 826-857. Washington: AERA.
Hillier, Lynne, Lyn Harrison, and Deborah Warr. 1998a. When you carry condoms all the boys think you want it: Negotiating competing discourses about safe sex. Journal of Adolescence 2 (1): 15–29.
Hillier, Lynne, Deborah Warr, and Ben Haste. 1998b. Rural youth: HIV/STD knowledge levels and sources of information. Australian Journal of Rural Health 6 (1): 18–26.
Jahangeer, Ajaheb, Shamim Jahangeer, and Abdul Cayum. 2004. School culture in a private secondary institution in Mauritius. International Educational Journal 5 (2): 247–254.
Khedo, Kavi, Rajen Suntoo, Sheik Mohammad Roushdat, Ally Elaheebocus, and Asslinah Mocktoolah. 2013. Impact of online social networking on youth: Case study of Mauritius. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 56 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2013.tb00400.x.
Lindsey, Margaret. 1962. Decision-making and the teacher. A. H. Passow ed. Curriculum crossroads: A report of a curriculum conference:27–40. New York: Teachers College Press.
Mariaye, Marie Hyleen Sandra. 2005. The role of the school in providing moral education in a multicultural society: The case study of Mauritius, 598. Psychology of: Education. University of South Africa.
McLeod, Saul. 2019. Case study method. SimplyPsychology. http://www.simplypsychology.org/case-study.html>.
Murray, Print. 1987. Curriculum development and design. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Rambaree, Komalsingh. 2011. ‘Young people and cybersex in a sexually conservative society: A Case Study from Mauritius’Youth Culture and Net Culture: Online Social Practices:171–189. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-209-3.ch010.
Reeuwijk, Miranda, and Papreen Nahar. 2013. The importance of a positive approach to sexuality in sexual health programs for unmarried adolescents in Bangladesh. Reproductive Health Matters 21 (41): 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0968-8080(13)41694-4.
Ryan, Kevin. 1986. The new moral education. Phi-Delta-Kappan 68 (4): 228–233.
Spilt, Jantine, Helma Koomen, and Suzanne Jak. 2012. Are boys better off with male and girls with female teachers? A multicultural investigation of measurement invariance and gender match in teacher-student relationship. Journal of School Psychology 50: 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.12.002.
Skinner, Burrhus Frederic. 1974. About behaviourism. London: Jonathan Cape.
Tang, Vanessa, Timothy Shaw, and Merle Holden. 2018. Development and sustainable growth of Mauritius. Cham, Switzerland: Contemporary African Political Economy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96166-8.
Terrence, Deal, and Peterson Kent. 2016. Shaping school culture. 3rd ed. San Francisco. United States of America: Jossey-Bass.
Tripathi, Niharika and TV Sekher. 2013. ‘Youth in India ready for sex education? Emerging evidence from NationalSurveys’.PLoSONE,8(8) .https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0071584.
Turiel, Elliot. 2002. The culture of morality: Social development, context and conflict. Cambridge. Cambridge university press.
Vaismoradi, Mojtaba, Jacqueline Jones, Hannele Turunen, and Sherrill Snelgrove. 2016. Theme development in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice 6 (5): 100–110.
Vermillion, Stephen, Melisa Holmes, and David Soper. 2000. Adolescents and sexually transmissible diseases. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 27 (1): 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0809-8545(00)80012-1.
Wayland, Sloan. 1962. The teacher as decision-maker. A. H. Passow ed. Curriculum crossroads: A report of a curriculum conference: 41-52. New York: Teachers College Press.
Yee Lo W. 2009. Understanding and attitudes towards moral and civic education among primary school teachers in Hong Kong. Asian Social Science, 5(7):3–15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 29 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Emambokus, W.B.S. Investigating teachers’, students’ and parents’ perspectives concerning school-based morality education: a case study in a multicultural background in Mauritius. International Journal of Ethics Education 6, 21–35 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40889-020-00105-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40889-020-00105-z