The Role of Network Learning Capability in the Relationship between Open Mindedness and Innovation Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.4/359Keywords:
Open Mindedness, Network Learning Capability, Networking, Innovation Performance, InnovationAbstract
Learning, which is the main key of innovation, is an indispensable element for companies to gain sustainable competitive advantage. Although not being adequately studied in management literature, network learning capability, a type of organizational learning ability, is a determining factor in the innovation process. Likewise, open-mindedness is a component that accelerates the creation of knowledge in the organization as well as encouraging the organization to be open towards new opportunities and to value different opinions. In this study, a model including these variables was designed and the mediator role of network learning in the relationship between open-mindedness and innovation performance was explored. It is suggested that open-mindedness has a positive effect on innovation performance and that network learning capability possesses a mediator role in this relationship. The data were collected through surveys answered by the middle and senior managers of Turkey’s leading companies. As a result, it is pointed out that there is a positive and significant relationship between open-mindedness and innovation performance, and that network learning has a mediator effect on this relationship. This study adds value to the management literature by highlighting the momentousness of network learning capability in the innovation process as well as offering several avenues of future studies and implications for different stakeholders.
References
Ahuja, G. (1996). Collaboration and innovation: a longitudinal study of interfirm linkages and firm patenting performance in the global advanced materials industry [Doctoral dissertation,. University of Michigan, Michigan]. University of Michigan Library. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/129835
Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425-455. https://doi.org/10.2307%2F2667105
Ahuja, G., Soda, G., & Zaheer, A. (2012). The genesis and dynamics of organizational networks. Organization Science, 23(2), 434-448. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0695
Akgün, Ali Ekber, Keskin, H. & Byrne, J. (2009). Outsourcing: Organizational Emotional Capability, Product and Process Innovation, and Firm Performance: An Emprical Analysis. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 26(8), 103-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2009.06.008
Alegre, J., & Chiva, R. (2008). Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: An empirical test. Technovation, 28(6), 315-326. https://isiarticles.com/bundles/Article/pre/pdf/4006.pdf
Alegre, J., & Chiva, R. (2013). Linking entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: The role of organizational learning capability and innovation performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(4), 491-507. http://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12005
Anderson, J., & Gerbing, D. (1988). Structural Equation Modelling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The Moderator - Mediator Variable distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173
Batterink, M. (2008). Profiting from external knowledge: how firms use different knowledge acquisition strategies to improve their innovation performance. Wageningen Academic Publishers.
Beckman, C. M., & Haunschild, P. R. (2002). Network learning: The effects of partners' heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions. Administrative science quarterly, 47(1), 92-124. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.2307/3094892
Bergenholtz, C., & Waldstrøm, C. (2011). Inter-organizational network studies - a literature review. Industry and Innovation, 18(6), 539-562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2011.591966
Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., & Tsai, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 795-817. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.2307/20159624
Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS. Taylor & Francis Group.
Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S. T., & Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), 515-524. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(01)00203-6
Calisir, F., Gumussoy, C. A., & Guzelsoy, E. (2013). Impacts of learning orientation on product innovation performance. The Learning Organization, 20(3), 176-194. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696471311328442
Caseiro, N., & Coelho, A. (2019). The influence of Business Intelligence capacity, network learning and innovativeness on startups performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(3), 139-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2018.03.009
Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., & Cepeda-Carrión, G. (2008). Why open-mindedness needs time to explore and exploit knowledge. Time & Society, 17(2-3), 195-213. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0961463X08093422
Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., & Sánchez-Polo, M. T. (2011). Influence of the open-mindedness culture on organizational memory: an empirical investigation of Spanish SMEs. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(1), 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.538963
Civelek, M. E. (2018a). Essentials of Structural Equation Modeling. Zea Books.
Civelek, M. E. (2018b). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi Metodolojisi [Structural Equation Modeling Methodology]. Beta.
Coviello, N., & Munro, H. (1997). Network relationships and the internationalisation process of small software firms. International Business Review, 6(4), 361-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-5931(97)00010-3
Daekwan, K., Cavusgil, S. T., & Calantone, R., J. (2006). Information System Innovations and Supply Chain Management: Channel Relationships and Firm Performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 34(1), 40-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0092070305281619
Dewangan, V., & Godse, M. (2014). Towards a holistic enterprise innovation performance measurement system. Technovation, 34(9), 536-545. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHNOVATION.2014.04.002
Dukeov, I., Bergman, J. P., Heilmann, P., & Nasledov, A. (2020). Impact of a firm's commitment to learning and open-mindedness on its organizational innovation among Russian manufacturing firms. Baltic Journal of Management, 15(4) 551-569. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-04-2019-0128
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F002224378101800104
Fukugawa, N. (2006). Determining factors in innovation of small firm networks: a case of cross industry groups in Japan. Small Business Economics, 27(2), 181-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-0010-2v
Gibb, J., Sune, A., & Albers, S. (2017). Network learning: Episodes of interorganizational learning towards a collective performance goal. European Management Journal, 35(1), 15-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.09.001
Gloet, M., & Terziovski, M. (2004). Exploring the relationship between knowledge management practices and innovation performance. Journal of manufacturing technology management, 15(5), 402-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17410380410540390
Greco, M., Grimaldi, M., & Cricelli, L. (2016). An analysis of the open innovation effect on firm performance. European Management Journal, 34(5), 501-516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.02.008
Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 293-317. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3094067
Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kilic, K., & Alpkan, L. (2011). Effects of innovation types on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(2), 662-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.014
Hanna, V. (2007). Exploiting complementary competencies via inter-firm cooperation. International Journal of Technology Management, 37(3–4), 247-258. https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1504/IJTM.2007.012261
Hernández-Mogollon, R., Cepeda-Carrión, G., Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., & Leal-Millán, A. (2010). The role of cultural barriers in the relationship between open-mindedness and organizational innovation. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 23(4), 360-376. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811011055377
Huggins, R., Johnston, A., & Thompson, P. (2012). Network capital, social capital and knowledge flow: how the nature of inter-organizational networks impacts on innovation. Industry and Innovation, 19(3), 203-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2012.669615
Hung, R. Y. Y., Lien, B. Y. H., Yang, B., Wu, C. M., & Kuo, Y. M. (2011). Impact of TQM and organizational learning on innovation performance in the high-tech industry. International Business Review, 20(2), 213-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJPQM.2017.082831
Inauen, M., & Schenker‐Wicki, A. (2011). The impact of outside‐in open innovation on innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(4), 496-520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14601061111174934
Kmieciak, R. (2019). Improving SME performance through organizational memory. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 32(4), 473-491. http://doi.org/10.1108/jocm-01-2019-0003
Knight, L. (2002). Network learning: Exploring learning by interorganizational networks. Human Relations, 55(4), 427-454. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0018726702554003
Knight, L., & Pye, A. (2004). Exploring the relationships between network change and network learning. Management Learning, 35(4), 473-490. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507604048274
Knight, L., & Pye, A. (2005). Network learning: An empirically derived model of learning by groups of organizations. Human Relations, 58(3), 369-392. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/0018726705053427
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
Lee, C. K., Tan, B., & Chiu, J. Z. (2008). The impact of organisational culture and learning on innovation performance. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 5(4), 413-428. https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1504/IJIL.2008.017561
Lord, M. (2015). Group learning capacity: the roles of open-mindedness and shared vision. Frontiers in psychology, 6(1322), 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00150
Lubatkin, M., Florin, J., & Lane, P. (2001). Learning together and apart: A model of reciprocal interfirm learning. Human Relations, 54(10), 1353-1382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00187267015410005
Lundvall, B. Å., & Nielsen, P. (2007). Knowledge management and innovation performance. International Journal of Manpower, 28(3/4), 207-223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01437720710755218
Mardani, A., Nikoosokhan, S., Moradi, M., & Doustar, M. (2018). The relationship between knowledge management and innovation performance. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 29(1), 12-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HITECH.2018.04.002
Mitchell, R., Parker, V., & Giles, M. (2012). Open-mindedness in diverse team performance: investigating a three-way interaction. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(17), 3652-3672. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/09585192.2012.654807
Mokhtarzadeh, N. G., Mahdiraji, H. A., Jafarpanah, I., Jafari-Sadeghi, V., & Cardinali, S. (2020). Investigating the impact of networking capability on firm innovation performance: using the resource-action-performance framework. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21(6), 1009-1034. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JIC-01-2020-0005
Mort, G. S., & Weerawardena, J. (2006). Networking capability and international entrepreneurship: How networks function in Australian born global firms. International Marketing Review, 23(5), 549-572. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651330610703445
Pan, X., Song, M. L., Zhang, J., & Zhou, G. (2019). Innovation network, technological learning and innovation performance of high-tech cluster enterprises. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(9), 1729-1746. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2018-0371
Paruchuri, S. (2010). Intraorganizational networks, interorganizational networks, and the impact of central inventors: A longitudinal study of pharmaceutical firms. Organization Science, 21(1), 63-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/27765952
Perin, M. G., Sampaio, C. H., Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Cegarra-Navarro, J. G. (2016). Network effects on radical innovation and financial performance: An open-mindedness approach. BAR-Brazilian Administration Review, 13(4), e160057. https://doi.org/10.1590/10.1590/1807-7692bar2016160057
Peters, L. D., Pressey, A. D., Westerlund, M., & Rajala, R. (2010). Learning and innovation in inter‐organizational network collaboration. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 25(6), 435-442. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858621011066026
Popp, J., Milward, H. B., MacKean, G., Casebeer, A., & Lindstrom, R. (2014). Inter-organizational networks: A review of the literature to inform practice. IBM Center for the Business of Government.
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 116-145. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.2307/2393988
Provan, K. G., Fish, A., & Sydow, J. (2007). Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of Management, 33(3), 479-516. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0149206307302554
Riggs, W. (2010). Open‐mindedness. Metaphilosophy, 41(1-2), 172-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01625.x
Shan, W.J., Walker, G., & Kogut, B. (1994). Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 15(5), 387-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150505
Singh, J., & Fleming, L. (2010). Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Science, 56(1), 41-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1072
Sydow, J., & Windeler, A. (1998). Organizing and evaluating interfirm networks: A structurationist perspective on network processes and effectiveness. Organization Science, 9(3), 265-284. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.3.265
Taylor, R. M. (2016). Open‐mindedness: An intellectual virtue in the pursuit of knowledge and understanding. Educational theory, 66(5), 599-618. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12201
Thorgren, S., Wincent, J., & Örtqvist, D. (2009). Designing interorganizational networks for innovation: An empirical examination of network configuration, formation and governance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 26(3), 148-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2009.06.006
Thornhill, S. (2006). Knowledge, innovation and firm performance in high-and low-technology regimes. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(5), 687-703. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.06.001
Tuan, N., Nhan, N., Giang, P., & Ngoc, N. (2016). The effects of innovation on firm performance of supporting industries in Hanoi, Vietnam. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 9(2), 413-431. http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem.1564
Turunç, Ö., & Turgut, H. (2017). Yönetim ve Strateji 101 Teori ve Yaklaşım [Management and Strategy 101 Theory and Approach]. Siyasal Kitabevi.
Wang, Y. L., & Ellinger, A. D. (2011). Organizational learning: Perception of external environment and innovation performance. International Journal of Manpower, 32(5-6), 512-536. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437721111158189
Weerawardena, J., Mort, G. S., Salunke, Knight, S., G. & Liesch, P. W. (2014). The role of the market sub-system and the socio-technical sub-system in innovation and firm performance: a dynamic capabilities approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(2), 221-239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0382-9
Wensley, A. K., Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., Cepeda-Carrión, G., & Millán, A. G. L. (2011). How entrepreneurial actions transform customer capital through time: Exploring and exploiting knowledge in an open-mindedness context. International Journal of Manpower, 32(1), 132-150. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437721111121279
White, L. (2008). Connecting organizations: Developing the idea of network learning in inter‐organizational settings. Systems Research and Behavioral Science: The Official Journal of the International Federation for Systems Research, 25(6), 701-716. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.923
Yeşil, S., Koska, A., & Büyükbeşe, T. (2013). Knowledge sharing process, innovation capability and innovation performance: An empirical study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 75, 217-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.025
Zaheer, A., Gözübüyük, R., & Milanov, H. (2010). It's the connections: The network perspective in interorganizational research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(1), 62-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2010.50304417
Zeng, S. X., Xie, X. M., & Tam, C. M. (2010). Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs. Technovation, 30(3), 181-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.003
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
