Abstract
These replies to commentators on my work focus on the nature of epistemic norms, on the nature of truth and on the nature and value of knowledge. A normative account of belief and knowledge is committed to substantial and objective epistemic norms. But not everyone agrees on their form. I try here to reply to some doubts raised by my critics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Engel, P. (2013). Belief and the right kind of reason. Teorema XXII, 3, 19–34.
Lehrer, K. (2012). “Cognition, consensus and consciousness: my replies”, in “The Philosophy of Keith Lehrer”. Philosophical Studies, 161, 163–184.
Reynolds, S. (2013). Justification as the appearance of knowledge. Philosophical Studies, 163(2), 367–383.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Engel, P. Replies: on norms of belief and knowledge. Synthese 194, 1555–1564 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1358-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1358-3