Skip to main content
Log in

The social determinants of health, care ethics and just health care

  • Article
  • Published:
Contemporary Political Theory Aims and scope

Abstract

Political theorists generally defend the moral importance of health care by appealing to its purported importance in promoting good health and saving lives. Recent research on the social determinants of health demonstrates, however, that health care actually does relatively little to promote good health or save lives in comparison with other social and environmental factors. This article assesses the implications of the social determinants of health literature for existing theories of health care justice, and outlines a new approach that can justify publicly subsidized comprehensive health care despite its limited contribution to good health. Even if health care plays a relatively limited role in promoting good health, it remains morally important because of the care it provides to individuals. As such, it can be justified in terms of care ethics. When health care is justified primarily in terms of care rather than health, however, the goals of a just health-care system shift. The measure of a just health-care system is no longer strictly its ability to generate good health outcomes but also its ability to provide individuals with accessible, good quality daily care. This different focus has important consequences for the way we think about the institutions of a just health-care system as well as for the delivery and allocation of medical goods and services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Beginning in the 1930s, immunizations, antibiotics and other medical interventions nonetheless did hasten the further decline in mortality from infectious diseases, especially among young people (Nolte and McKee, 2004, p. 12).

  2. High-tech medical procedures (coronary angiography, angioplasty or artery bypass surgery) can be effective, but are apparently overused in the United States. The development and increased use of pharmaceuticals has also played an important role in decreasing mortality from cardiovascular disease.

  3. This view is endorsed at least by most versions of liberal theory.

  4. Most European states offer coverage of all or most of these services.

  5. For example, it violates the assumption of an equal distribution of risks and perfect information, leading to adverse selection by both insurance companies and individuals. Individuals are also notoriously bad at assessing their own risks and making adequate provisions for them.

References

  • Arrow, K. (1963) Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care. The American Economic Review 53 (5): 941–973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, N. (2004) Economics of the Welfare State, 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B. (2005) Why Social Justice Matters. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, R. and Burau, V. (2007) Comparative Health Policy, 2nd edn. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, D. (2000) Broadening the Bioethics Agenda. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (1): 21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, A. (2009) Justice and Health Care. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colby, J. (2009) Normal Daniels: Just health: Meeting health needs fairly. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 34 (5): 839–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conti, G., Heckman, J. and Urzua, S. (2010) The education-health gradient. American Economic Review 100 (2): 234–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, D. (2004) Your Money or Your Life: Strong Medicine for America’s Health Care System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, N. (1985) Just Health Care. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, N. (2007) Rescuing university health care. Hasting Center Report 37 (2): 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, N. (2008) Just Health: Meeting Health Needs Fairly. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, N. (2011) Justice and access to health care. In: E. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/justice-healthcareaccess/, accessed 5 October 2012.

  • Engster, D. (2007) The Heart of Justice: Care Ethics and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, J., Lomax, G., Baird, P. and Lock, M. (2006) Interactive role of genes and environment. In: J. Heymann, C. Hertzman, M. Barer and R. Evans (eds.) Healthier Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 11–34.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982) In A Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, D. and Lakdawalla, D. (2010) Can the ACA improve population health? The Economists’ Voice 7 (5): 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, V. (2006) The Ethics of Care. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heymann, J., Hertzman, C., Barer, M. and Evans, R. (eds.) (2006) Healthier Societies: From Analysis to Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kittay, E. (1999) Love’s Labor. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunst, A. and Mackenbach, J. (1994) The size of mortality differences associated with educational level in nine industrialized countries. American Journal of Public Health 84 (6): 932–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, T. (2005) At the intersection of intimacy and care: Redefining ‘Family’ through the lens of a public ethic of care. Politics and Gender 1 (1): 65–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, J. (1997) Medicine and public health, ethics and human rights. Hastings Center Report 27 (3): 6–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marmot, M. (2004) The Status Syndrome. New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmot, M. and Wilkinson, R. (2006) Social Determinants of Health, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeown, T. (1979) The Role of Medicine. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinlay, J. and McKinlay, S. (1977) The questionable contribution of medical measures to the decline of mortality in the United States in the twentieth century. Health and Society 55 (3): 405–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S.C. (2011) The Ethics of Need: Agency, Dignity, and Obligation. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (2002) Starting at Home. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolte, E., Bain, C. and McKee, M. (2009) Population health. In: P. Smith, E. Mossialos, I. Papanicolas and S. Leatherman (eds.) Performance Measurement for Health System Improvement: Experiences, Challenges, and Prospects. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolte, E. and McKee, M. (2004) Does Health Care Save Lives? Avoidable Mortality Revisited. London: Nuffield Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolte, E. and McKee, M. (2011) Variations in amenable mortality – Trends in 16 high-income nations. Health Policy 103 (1): 47–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2010) Health Care Systems: Efficiency and Policy Settings. Paris: OECD Publishing.

  • Powers, M. and Faden, R. (2006) Social Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1999) A Theory of Justice, Revised Edition. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, T. and Unruh, L. (2009) The Economics of Health Reconsidered, 3rd edn. Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roos, N., Brownell, M. and Menec, V. (2006) Universal medical care and health inequalities: Right objectives, insufficient tools. In: J. Heymann, C. Hertzman, M. Barer and R. Evans (eds.) Healthier Societies: From Analysis to Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 107–131.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ruger, J. (2010) Health and Social Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segall, S. (2007) Is health care (Still) special? The Journal of Political Philosophy 15 (3): 342–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segall, S. (2010) Is health (Really) special? Health policy between rawlsian and luck egalitarian justice. Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (4): 344–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D. (2007) Is the Welfare State Justified? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist, J. and Marmot, M. (eds.) (2006) Social Inequalities in Health. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Silvers, A. (2009) No talent? Beyond the worst off! A diverse theory of justice for disability. In: K. Brownlee and A. Cureton (eds.) Disability and Disadvantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 163–199.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Slote, M. (2007) The Ethics of Care and Empathy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sreenivasan, G. (2007) Health care and equality of opportunity. The Hastings Center Report 37 (2): 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sreenivasan, G. (2009) Justice, inequality, and health. In: E. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/justice-inequality-health/, accessed 5 October 2012.

  • Tronto, J. (1993) Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. (2000) Democracy, Justice, and the Welfare State. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R. (1996) Unhealthy Societies: The Afflictions of Inequality. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R. and Pickett, K. (2009) The Spirit Level. New York: Bloomsbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Engster, D. The social determinants of health, care ethics and just health care. Contemp Polit Theory 13, 149–167 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/cpt.2013.14

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/cpt.2013.14

Keywords

Navigation