Argument appraisal strategy: A comprehensive approach

Authors

  • Robert H. Ennis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v21i2.2240

Keywords:

critical thinking, argument, argument appraisal, induction, deduction, qualified reasoning, value judging, assumptions, ceteris paribus, prima facie, probably

Abstract

A popular three-stage argument appraisal strategy calls for (1) identifying the parts of the argument, (2) classifYing the argument as deductive, inductive, or some other type, and (3) appraising the argument using the standards appropriate for the type. This strategy fails for a number of reasons. I propose a comprehensive alternative approach that distinguishes between inductive, deductive, and other standards; calls for the successive application of standards combined with assumption-ascription, according to policies that depend for their selection on the goals of the appraiser; and provides for qualified reasoning.

Downloads

Published

2001-01-01

Issue

Vol. 21 No. 2 (2001)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright for each article published in Informal Logic belongs to its author(s). Informal Logic has the right of first publication. Permission to reprint any article that appears in Informal Logic MUST be obtained in writing from the author(s). In addition to any form of acknowledgement required by the author(s), the following notice must be added to the statement of copyright permission made in the reprint (with the appropriate numbers replacing the ellipses): [Article Title] was originally published in Informal Logic, [year], Volume ..., Number ..., pp. ...-... .