Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reason and revelation: Kant and the problem of authority

  • Published:
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the significance of authority for Kant’s understanding of the relationship between reason and revelation. Beginning with the separation of the faculties of Theology and Philosophy in Conflict, it will be shown that Kant sees a clear distinction between the authority of reason and that of revelation. However, when one turns to Religion, it is also clear that Kant sees an important, perhaps necessary, relationship between the two. Drawing on a variety of texts, in particular those concerning the public and private use of reason, this paper then explores the relationship between the authority of reason and that of revelation. From this discussion, several conclusions will be drawn regarding Kant’s understanding of the relationship between reason and revelation, namely that while distinct, the two are not necessarily in conflict and that, ultimately, the proper functioning of public reason must include some reference to revelation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Despland M. (1973). Kant on history and religion. Montreal, McGill-Queen’s

    Google Scholar 

  • Firestone C. (2006). Making sense out of tradition. In: Firestone C., Palmquist S.(eds) Kant and the new philosophy of religion. Bloomington, Indiana University, pp. 141–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare J. (2006). Kant on the rational instability of atheism. In: Firestone C., Palmquist S.(eds) Kant and the new philosophy of religion. Bloomington, Indiana University, pp. 62–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I. (1960). Religion within the limits of reason alone T. Greene & H. Hudson,Trans. New York, Harper Torchbooks

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I. (1979). The conflict of the faculties M. Gregor, Trans. Lincoln, University of Nebraska

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I. (1987). Critique of judgment W Pluhar,Trans. Indianapolis, Hackett

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I. (1996). An answer to the question: What is enlightenment?. In: Gregor M.(ed) Practical philosophy. New York, Cambridge, pp. 11–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I. (1997). Critique of pure reason P. Guyer & A. Wood,Trans. New York, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill O. (1986). The public use of reason. Political Theory 14(4): 523–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood A. (1970). Kant’s moral religion. Ithaca, Cornell University Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. MCC Indonesia, J1. Merbabu No. 3, Salatiga, 50724, Indonesia

    Phil Enns

  2. Universitas Islam Negri, Jogjakarta, Indonesia

    Phil Enns

Authors
  1. Phil Enns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Phil Enns.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Enns, P. Reason and revelation: Kant and the problem of authority. Int J Philos Relig 62, 103–114 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-007-9135-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-007-9135-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation