Skip to main content
Log in

Gender Differences in Ethical Perceptions of Salespeople: An Empirical Examination in Turkey

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Researchers on gender and ethical decision-making have recently emphasized the differences between men's and women's ethical perceptions. This study is concerned with the perceptions of salespeople working in clothing and medical equipment sectors in Turkey. It regards the perceptions of colleagues of opposing genders in ethically questionable situations. The evaluation of salespeople's responses for 14 ethical scenarios indicates that there is no significant difference in ethical perception based on gender. Each gender predicted that their counterpart's response would be the same as their own. The study also examined the effects of some demographic factors as well as the firm's sector on the salespeople's ethical perceptions and found that there are both differences and similarities in detail between genders of salespeople within ethically questionable situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaah, I.: 1989, ‘Differences in Research Ethics Judgments Between Male and Female Marketing Professionals’, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 375-381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellizzi, J. A. and R. E. Hite: 1989, ‘Supervising Unethical Salesforce Behavior’, Journal of Marketing(April).

  • Burleson, R. B., A. W. Kunkel, W. Samter and K. J. Werking: 1996, ‘Men's and Women's Evaluations of Communication Skills in Personal Relationships: When Sex Differences Make a Difference-And When They Don't’, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 13(2), 201-224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. R. and R. E. Walton: 1991, ‘Professional Ethics: Business Students' Perceptions’, Journal of Business Ethics 6, 451-463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P.: 1999, ‘Gender Differences in Autobiographical Memory for Childhood Emotional Experiences’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76(3), 498-510.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, L. M.: 1992, ‘Will Feminization Change the Ethics of the Sales Profession?’, Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management 12, 21-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, L. M.: 1997, ‘Ethical Differences Between Men and Women in The Sales Profession’, Journal of Business Ethics 16, 1143-1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K.: 1984, ‘From Individual Differences To Social Categories: Analysis of a Decade's Research on Gender’, American Psychologist 39(2), 105-116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekin, M. G. S. and S. H. Tezölmez: 1999, ‘Business Ethics in Turkey: An Empirical Investigation with Special Emphasis on Gender’, Journal of Business Ethics 18, 17-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C. and S. J. Skinner: 1988, ‘Ethical Behavior and Bureaucratic Structure in Marketing Research Organizations’, Journal of Marketing Research 25, 103-109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche, D.: 1988, ‘An Examination of Marketing Ethics: Role of the Decision Maker, Consequences of the Decision Management Position, and Sex of the Respondent’, Journal of Macromarketing 8(2), 29-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C.: 1977, ‘In a Different Voice, Women's Conception of Self and of Morality’ Harvard Business Review 47, 481-517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodale, J. G. and D. T. Hall: 1976, ‘Inheriting a Career: The Influence of Sex, Values and Parents’, Journal of Vocational Behavior 8, 19-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. R.: 1990, ‘Ethical Value of Individuals at Different Levels in the Organizational Hierarchy of a Single Firm’, Journal of Business Ethics 9, 741-750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, H. G.: 1992, ‘Cultural Dimensions in Management and Planning’, in W. B. Gudykunst and Y. Y. Kim (eds.), Readings on Communicating with Strangers(Mc Graw-Hill, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell, J. M., R. E. Stewens, A. L. Bethke: 1987, ‘Differences in Ethical Perceptions Between Male and Female Managers: Myth or Reality?’, Journal of Business Ethics 6, 489-493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, J. W.: 1995, ‘Ethics of Business Students: Some Marketing Perspectives’, Journal of Business Ethics 14, 571-580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R.: 1998, ‘Gender-Related Individual Differences and the Structure of Vocational Interests: The Importance of the People-Things Dimension’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74(4), 996-1009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longenecker, J. G., J. A. McKinney and C. W. Moore: 1989, ‘Do Smaller Firms Have Higher Ethics?’, Business and Society Review, 19-21.

  • Lund, D. B.: 2000, ‘An Empirical Examination of Marketing Professionals' Ethical Behavior in Differing Situations’, Journal of Business Ethics 24, 331-342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, K. P.: 1999, ‘Has Technology Introduced New Ethical Problems’, Journal of Business Ethics 19, 91-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mengüç, B.: 1998, ‘Organizational Consequences, Marketing Ethics and Salesforce Supervision: Further Empirical Evidence’, Journal of Business Ethics 17, 333-352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W. J., P. V. Lewis and N. L. Reinsch: 1992, ‘Bank Ethics: An Exploratory Study of Ethical Behaviors and Perceptions in Small, Local Banks’, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 197-205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moncrief, W. C., E. Pabalius, D. W. Cravens, M. W. Johnston: 2000, ‘Examining Gender Differences in Field Sales Organizations’, Journal of Business Research.

  • Ruegger, D. and E. W. King: 1992, ‘A Study of the Effect of Age and Gender Upon Students of Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 179-186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, V. E., R. Mueller, T. Lituchy and J. Liu: 1996, ‘Think Manager-Think Male: A Global Phenomenon’, Journal of Organizational Behavior 17, 33-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheminke, M.: 1997, ‘Gender Differences in Ethical Frameworks and Evaluation of Others' Choices in Ethical Dilemmas’, Journal of Business Ethics 16, 55-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A. and S. J. Vitell: 1990, ‘Marketing Ethics: Factors Influencing Perception of Ethical Problems and Alternatives’, Journal of Macromarketing 10(1), 4-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. C.: 1995, ‘Marketing Strategies for the Ethics Era’, Sloan Management Review(Summer).

  • Smith, P. L. and E. F. Oackley, III: 1997, ‘Gender Related Differences in Ethical and Social Values of Business Student: Implications for Management’, Journal of Business Ethics 16, 37-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanga, K. G. and R. A. Turpen: 1991, ‘Ethical Judgment on Selected Accounting Issues: An Empirical Study’, Journal of Business Ethics 10, 739-747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strutton, D., J. B. Hamilton IIIand J. R. Lumpkin: 1997, ‘An Essay on When to Fully Disclose in Sales Relationships: Applying Two Practical Guidelines for Addressing Truth-Telling Problems’, Journal of Business Ethics 16, 545-560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K.: 1992, ‘Moral Reasoning and Business Ethics: Implications for Research, Education and Management’, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 445-459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, W., C. Ouwerkerk and E. Peelen: 1996, ‘Exploring the Contextual and Individual Factors on Ethical Decision Making of Salespeople’, Journal of Business Ethics 15, 1175-1187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, H. L., B. Ross and M. Winterbotham: 1993, ‘Communication of Specific Emotions: Gender Differences in Sending Accuracy and Communication Measures’, Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 17(1), 29-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, T. I.: 1993, Business Ethics: A Philosophical Reader(McMillian Pub. Comp., NewYork).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ergeneli, A., Arıkan, S. Gender Differences in Ethical Perceptions of Salespeople: An Empirical Examination in Turkey. Journal of Business Ethics 40, 247–260 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020550916408

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020550916408

Navigation