Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

In defence of theMind argument

  • Discussion
  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Finch, Alicia and Ted A. Warfield (1998) “TheMind Argument, and Libertarianism”,Mind, 107: 515–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobart, R. E. (1934) “Free Will as Involving Determination and Inconceivable Without It”,Mind 43: 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, Thomas J. and David Johnson (1996) “A Reconsideration of an Argument Against Compatibilism”,Philosophical Topics 24: 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowell-Smith, P. (1948). “Free Will and Moral Responsibility”,Mind 57: 45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. J. C. (1961) “Free-Will, Praise and Blame”,Mind 70: 291–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Inwagen, Peter (1983)An Essay on Free Will, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widerker, David (1987) “On an Argument for Incompatibilism”,Analysis 47: 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Uppsala University, S-753 10, Uppsala, Sweden

    Erik Carlson

Authors
  1. Erik Carlson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carlson, E. In defence of theMind argument. Philosophia 29, 393–400 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02379919

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02379919

Search

Navigation