Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T02:21:22.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Extending the multiple-levels approach to word processing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Lindsay J. Evett
Affiliation:
MRC Applied Psychology Unit, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge CB2 2EF, England
Glyn W. Humphreys
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Birkbeck College, London WC1E 7HX, England

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Author's Response
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, G. D. A. (in press) Resolving inconsistency: A computational model of word naming. Journal of Memory and Language. [rLJE, GDAB]Google Scholar
Feldman, L. B. & Turvey, M. T. (1983) Word recognition in Serbo-Croatian is phonologically analytic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 9:288–98. [rLJE]Google ScholarPubMed
Glushko, R. J. (1979) The organisation and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 5:674–91. [GDAB]Google Scholar
Henderson, L. (1982) Orthography and word recognition in reading. Academic Press. [rLJE, GDAB]Google Scholar
Humphreys, G. W. & Evett, L. J. (1985) Are there independent lexical and nonlexical routes in word processing? An evaluation of the dual-route theory of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8:689740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, J. (1982) Psychological mechanisms of oral reading of single words. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge. [GDAB]Google Scholar
Kay, J. & Marcel, A. J. (1981) One process, not two, in reading aloud: Lexical analogies do the work of non-lexical rules. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 33A:397414. [GDAB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukatela, C., Papadic, D., Ognjenovic, P. & Turvey, M. T. (1980) Lexical decision in a phonologically shallow orthography. Memory and Cognition 8:124–32. [rLJE]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, K. E. & Morton, J. (1985) From orthography to phonology: An attempt at an old interpretation. In: Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading, ed. Patterson, K. E., Marshall, J. C. & Coltheart, M.. Erlbaum. [GDAB]Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S. (1985a) The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition 19:130. [rLJE, GDAB]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seidenberg, M. S. (1985b) Constraining models of word recognition. Cognition 20:169–90. [GDAB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M. A. & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1984) When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 23:383404. [GDAB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shallice, T., Warrington, E. K. & McCarthy, B. (1983) Reading without semantics. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 35A:111–38. [GDAB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turvey, M. T., Feldman, L. B. & Lukatela, G. (1984) The Serbo-Croatian orthography constrains the reader to a phonologically analytic strategy. In: Orthographies and reading, ed. Henderson, L.. Erlbaum. [rLJE]Google Scholar