Skip to main content
Log in

An Explanation of Resisted Discoveries Based on Construal-Level Theory

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

New discoveries and theories are crucial for the development of science, but they are often initially resisted by the scientific community. This paper analyses resistance to scientific discoveries that supplement previous research results or conclusions with new phenomena, such as long chains in macromolecules, Alfvén waves, parity nonconservation in weak interactions and quasicrystals. Construal-level theory is used to explain that the probability of new discoveries may be underestimated because of psychological distance. Thus, the insufficiently examined scope of an accepted theory may lead to overstating the suitable scope and underestimating the probability of its undiscovered counter-examples. Therefore, psychological activity can result in people instinctively resisting new discoveries. Direct evidence can help people judge the validity of a hypothesis with rational thinking. The effects of authorities and textbooks on the resistance to discoveries are also discussed. From the results of our analysis, suggestions are provided to reduce resistance to real discoveries, which will benefit the development of science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alfvén, H. (1942). Existence of electromagnetic-hydrodynamic waves. Nature, 150(3805), 405–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B. (1961). Resistance by scientists to scientific discovery. Science, 134(347), 596–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bindi, L., Steinhardt, P. J., Yao, N., & Lu, P. J. (2009). Natural quasicrystals. Science, 324(5932), 1306–1309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campanario, J. M. (2009). Rejecting and resisting Nobel class discoveries: Accounts by Nobel Laureates. Scientometrics, 81(2), 549–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fälthammar, C.-G. (1997). Plasma physics from laboratory to cosmos—the life and achievements of Hannes Alfvén. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 25(3), 409–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Förster, J., Friedman, R. S., & Liberman, N. (2004). Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking: Consequences for insight and creative cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 177–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Förster, J., Liberman, N., & Shapira, O. (2009). Preparing for novel versus familiar events: Shifts in global and local processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 383–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1980). Premature discovery or delayed recognition—why? Current Contents, 21, 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1989). Delayed recognition in scientific discovery: Citation frequency analysis aids the search for case histories. Current Contents, 23, 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. D., & Yang, C. N. (1956). Question of parity conservation in weak interactions. Physical Review, 104(1), 254–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, N., Trope, Y., McCrea, S. M., & Sherman, S. J. (2007). The effect of level of construal on the temporal distance of activity enactment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(1), 143–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okun, L. B. (2007). Mirror particles and mirror matter: 50 years of speculation and searching. Physics-Uspekhi, 50(4), 380–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shechtman, D., Blech, I., Gratias, D., & Cahn, J. W. (1984). Metallic phase with long-range orientational order and no translational symmetry. Physical Review Letters, 53(20), 1951–1954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakslak, C., & Trope, Y. (2009). The effect of construal-level on subjective probability estimates. Psychological Science, 20(1), 52–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wróblewski, A. K. (2008). The downfall of parity—the revolution that happened fifty years ago. Acta Physica Polonica B, 39(2), 251–264.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui Fang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fang, H. An Explanation of Resisted Discoveries Based on Construal-Level Theory. Sci Eng Ethics 21, 41–50 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9512-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9512-x

Keywords

Navigation