Skip to main content

Looking at “Situated” Technology: Differences in Pattern of Interaction Reflect Differences in Context

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Modeling and Using Context (CONTEXT 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2116))

  • 595 Accesses

Abstract

Technology cannot be considered as a stand-alone element; it is always situated in a spatial and organizational context. To understand technology usage, we must focus on the context in which this usage takes place. We conducted two field studies of everyday interactions with and around copier machines. This paper describes these two studies and the interaction patterns that we observed. We found some variations in these interaction patterns. These variations can be interpreted as reflecting differences in contexts - both spatial and organizational.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blomberg, J., 1987, Social Interaction and Office Communication: Effects on User’s Evaluation of New Technologies. Technology and the Transformation of White Collar Work. R. Kraut. Hillsdale, New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 195–210.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Card, S.K., Moran, T., and Newell, A., 1983, The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction, Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hutchins, E., 1995, Cognition in the Wild, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jordan, B., 1993, Ethnographic Workplace Studies and Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Proceedings of the Interdisciplinary Workshop on Informatics and Psychology, Dan Shapiro, M. Tauber & R. Traunmüller, eds., Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jordan, B., and Henderson, A., 1995, “Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice.” The Journal of Learning Sciences, 4(1): 39–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nardi, B. and O’Day, 1999, Information Ecologies.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Norman, D., 1993, Things That Make Us Smart, Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Orr, J., 1996, Talking about Machines, ILR Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Suchman, L., 1987, Plans and Situated Action: The Problem of Human-machine Communication. New York, NY, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fayard, A.L., Henderson, A. (2001). Looking at “Situated” Technology: Differences in Pattern of Interaction Reflect Differences in Context. In: Akman, V., Bouquet, P., Thomason, R., Young, R. (eds) Modeling and Using Context. CONTEXT 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2116. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44607-9_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44607-9_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42379-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44607-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics