Post-Liberalism: The Death of a DreamLiberalism is dyingâ despite its superficial appearance of vigor. Most of its adherents still believe it is the wave of the future, but they are clinging to a sinking dream. So says Melvyn L. Fein, who argues that liberalism has made countless promises, almost none of which have come true. Under its auspices, poverty was not eliminated, crime did not diminish, the family was not strengthened, education was not improved, nor was universal peace established. These failures were not accidental; they flow directly from liberal contradictions. In Post-Liberalism, Fein demonstrates why this is the case. Fein contends that an "inverse force rule" dictates that small communities are united by strong forces, such as personal relationships and face-to-face hierarchies, while large-scale societies are integrated by weak forces, such as technology and social roles. As we become a more complex techno-commercial society, the weak forces become more dominant. This necessitates greater decentralization, in direct opposition to the centralization that liberals celebrate. Paradoxically, this suggests that liberalism, as an ideology, is regressive rather than progressive. If so, it must fail. Liberals assume that some day, under their tutelage, these trends will be reversed, but this contradicts human nature and historyâ s lessons. According to Fein, we as a species are incapable of eliminating hierarchy or of loving all other humans with equal intensity. Neither, as per Emile Durkheim, are we able to live in harmony without appropriate forms of social cohesion. |
Contents
1 | |
2 The Origins of the Dream | 35 |
3 Broken Promises | 69 |
4 Liberal Contradictions | 105 |
5 Ties that Bind | 145 |
6 Back to the Future | 185 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
achieve adults allowed American Barack Obama became become believe better capitalists competent consequence conservatism conservatives contemporary create cultural decentralized democratic dependent Despite Domain Theory economic emotional equality essential expected fact favor fear feel global warming hierarchies hippies human hunter-gatherer ideal illegitimacy individuals industrial intellectual interact interpersonal Jimmy Carter Karl Marx leaders less Liberal Dream likewise live Marx Marxist matter millions Milton Friedman moral Moreover motivated nation neoconservatives never Nevertheless nice norm Nowadays Obama once one’s ordinary other’s parents philosopher kings policies political potential poverty predictions profes professionalized programs promises protect realize regarded relationships respect responsible result role partners Rousseau self-motivated experts Similarly social roles strangers superior techno-commercial society things Thomas Sowell tion understand universal love War on Poverty wealth welfare whereas women workers wrong York