Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T16:57:02.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Beyond Feminist Aesthetics: Feminist Literature and Social Change. By Rita Felski. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Permission to reprint a book review from this selection may be obtained only from the author.

References

Bovenschen, Silvia. 1986. “Is there a feminine aesthetic?” In Feminist Aesthetics, ed. Ecker, Gisela. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Cixous, Hélène. 1981. “Castration or decapitation?” trans. Annette Kuhn. Signs 7 (1): 4155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooks, Bell. 1984. Feminist theory: From margin to center. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1985. This sex which is not one, Trans. Porter, Catherine. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jardine, Alice. 1981. “Pre‐Texts for the transatlantic feminist.” Yale French Sadies 62: 220–36.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1980. Desire in language, Trans. Gora, Thomas, Jardine, Alice, and Roudiez, Leon S.Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Moi, Toril. 1985. Sexual/Textual politics: feminist literary theory. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Spacks, Patricia Meyer. 1976. The female imagination: A literary and psychological investigation of women's writing. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1987. “Feminism and critical theory.” In Other worlds: essays in cultural politics. New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Stanley, Julia Penelope, and Wolfe, Susan J. 1978. “Towards a feminist aesthetic.” Chrysalis 6: 5771.Google Scholar