Abstract
Free full text
Applying best interests to persistent vegetative state--a principled distortion?
Abstract
"Best interests" is widely accepted as the appropriate foundation principle for medico-legal decisions concerning treatment withdrawal from patients in persistent vegetative state (PVS). Its application appears to progress logically from earlier use regarding legally incompetent patients. This author argues, however, that such confidence in the relevance of the principle of best interests to PVS is misplaced, and that current construction in this context is questionable on four specific grounds. Furthermore, it is argued that the resulting legal inconsistency is distorting both the principle itself and, more particularly, individual patient interests.
Full text
Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.2M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Mason JK, Mulligan D. Euthanasia by stages. Lancet. 1996 Mar 23;347(9004):810–811. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Craig GM. On withholding nutrition and hydration in the terminally ill: has palliative medicine gone too far? J Med Ethics. 1994 Sep;20(3):139–145. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- McLean S. End-of-life decisions and the law. J Med Ethics. 1996 Oct;22(5):261–262. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group
Full text links
Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.24.2.86
Read article for free, from open access legal sources, via Unpaywall: https://jme.bmj.com/content/24/2/86.full.pdf
Citations & impact
Impact metrics
Citations of article over time
Smart citations by scite.ai
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been
supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1136/jme.24.2.86
Article citations
The theorisation of 'best interests' in bioethical accounts of decision-making.
BMC Med Ethics, 22(1):68, 01 Jun 2021
Cited by: 5 articles | PMID: 34074274 | PMCID: PMC8167991
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
How many patients in a prolonged disorder of consciousness might need a best interests meeting about starting or continuing gastrostomy feeding?
Clin Rehabil, 32(11):1551-1564, 21 May 2018
Cited by: 6 articles | PMID: 29779405
Review
Functional neuroimaging and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment from vegetative patients.
J Med Ethics, 35(8):508-511, 01 Aug 2009
Cited by: 21 articles | PMID: 19644010 | PMCID: PMC2711351
"Neglected personhood" and neglected questions: remarks on the moral significance of consciousness.
Am J Bioeth, 8(9):31-33, 01 Sep 2008
Cited by: 5 articles | PMID: 18853381
Is it in the best interests of an intellectually disabled infant to die?
J Med Ethics, 32(8):454-459, 01 Aug 2006
Cited by: 13 articles | PMID: 16877624 | PMCID: PMC2563380
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Go to all (10) article citations
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
Persistent vegetative state, withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration, and the patient's "best interests".
J Med Ethics, 24(2):75-76, 01 Apr 1998
Cited by: 3 articles | PMID: 9602991 | PMCID: PMC1377449
Best interests in persistent vegetative state.
J Med Ethics, 25(1):59-60, 01 Feb 1999
Cited by: 1 article | PMID: 10070641 | PMCID: PMC479170
Incompetent patient in PVS: views of relatives and "best interests": Re G.
Med Law Rev, 3(1):80-84, 01 Jan 1995
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 11656729
Selective nontreatment of handicapped newborns: an analysis.
Med Law, 6(6):499-524, 01 Jan 1987
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 2959834
Review
Can healthcare providers obtain judicial intervention against surrogates who demand "medically inappropriate" life support for incompetent patients?
Crit Care Med, 24(5):883-887, 01 May 1996
Cited by: 8 articles | PMID: 8706470
Review