This article examines recent theories of democratic citizenship as well as the institutional separation of religion and politics in light of shortcomings with the traditional secularization thesis. Due to the fact that juridical norms and forms of consciousness develop at a more rapid pace than religious ones, received accounts of both democratic equality and toleration need to be reconceptualized. Questions concerning the legitimacy and neutrality of religious reasoning in democratic politics, as pursued in the work of Rawls and Habermas, also need to be informed by further reflection on the confessional context and other empirical features of post-secular societies. Comparing the politics of same-sex marriage in Canada and Italy helps to illustrate this point.
CITATION STYLE
Ferrara, A. (2009). The separation of religion and politics in a post-secular society. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 35(1–2), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453708098755
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.