Skip to main content
Log in

Piecemeal realism

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bohr, N. 1934. Atomic theory and the description of nature. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. 1981. Scientific realism and naturalistic epistemology. In PSA 1980, Volume II, edited by P. D. Asquith and R. Giere. E. Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 613–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N. 1983. How the laws of physics lie. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N. 1989. Nature's capacities and their measurement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devitt, M. 1984. Realism and truth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. 1943. The development of American pragmatism. In Twentieth century philosophy, edited by D. D. Runes. New York: Philosophical Library, pp. 451–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, A. (1986a). The shaky game: Einstein, realism and the quantum theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Revised paperback edition 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, A. 1986b. Unnatural attitudes: Realist and instrumentalist attachments to science. Mind XCV: 149–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. 1975. The language of thought. New York: Thomas Crowell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroch, R. 1978. General relativity from A to B. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. 1983. Representing and intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. 1970. The crisis of the European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Translated by David Carr. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullin, E. 1984. A case for scientific realism. In Scientific Realism, edited by J. Leplin. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 8–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. W. 1987. Fact and method. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton-Smith, W. 1989. Modest Realism. In PSA 1988, Volume II, edited by A. Fine and J. Leplin. E. Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 179–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. 1975. Mathematics, matter and method, Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushdie, S. 1983. Shame. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, W. 1963. Science, perception and reality. New York: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapere, D. 1985. Objectivity, rationality and scientific change. In PSA 1984, Volume II, edited by P. D. Asquith and P. Kitcher. E. Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 637–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. C. C. 1963. Philosophy and scientific realism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B. C. 1980. The scientific image. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I should like to thank a number of people whose comments and suggestions have influenced the development of this paper; most notably, Richard Boyd, Keith Donnellan, Ian Hacking, Richard Miller, Alan Nelson, Bonnie Paller, David Stump, and Nicholas Sturgeon. Special thanks to Ernan McMullin, who provided an extensive critique as part of his commentary at Oberlin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fine, A. Piecemeal realism. Philos Stud 61, 79–96 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00385834

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00385834

Navigation