Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T04:27:42.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

David Lewis, Donald C. Williams, and the History of Metaphysics in the Twentieth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2015

A. R. J. FISHER*
Affiliation:
UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTERarjfisher@manchester.ac.uk

Abstract:

The revival of analytic metaphysics in the latter half of the twentieth century is typically understood as a consequence of the critiques of logical positivism, Quine's naturalization of ontology, Kripke's Naming and Necessity, clarifications of modal notions in logic, and the theoretical exploitation of possible worlds. However, this explanation overlooks the work of metaphysicians at the height of positivism and linguisticism that affected metaphysics of the late twentieth century. Donald C. Williams is one such philosopher. In this paper I explain how Williams's fundamental ontology and philosophy of time influenced in part the early formation of David Lewis's metaphysics. Thus, Williams played an important role in the revival of analytic metaphysics.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Philosophical Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Robert Merrihew. (1974) ‘Theories of Actuality’. Noûs, 8 (3), 211–31.Google Scholar
Alexander, Samuel. (1920) Space, Time, and Deity: The Gifford Lectures at Glasgow 1916–1918. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. M. (1983) What is a Law of Nature? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. M. (1993) ‘Reply to Forrest’. In Bacon, J., Campbell, K., and Reinhardt, L. (eds.), Ontology, Causality and Mind (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), 6572.Google Scholar
Brandt, Richard B. (1957) ‘The Languages of Realism and Nominalism’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 17 (4), 516–35.Google Scholar
Broad, C. D. (1933) Examination of McTaggart's Philosophy. Vol. 1. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Keith. (1990) Abstract Particulars. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Glock, Hans-Johann. (2008) What is Analytic Philosophy? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson. (1951) The Structure of Appearance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Heil, John. (2012) The Universe As We Find It. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Holt, Edwin B., et al. (1912) The New Realism: Cooperative Studies in Philosophy. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. (1966) ‘An Argument for the Identity Theory’. Journal of Philosophy, 63 (1), 1725.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. (1973) Counterfactuals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. (1976) ‘The Paradoxes of Time Travel’. American Philosophical Quarterly, 13 (2), 145–52.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. (1983a) ‘New Work for a Theory of Universals’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 61 (4), 343–77.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. (1983b) Philosophical Papers. Vol. 1. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. (1986a) ‘Against Structural Universals’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 64 (1), 2546.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. (1986b) On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. (1986c) Philosophical Papers. Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. (1990) ‘Noneism or Allism?’. Mind, 99 (393), 2331.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. (1991) Parts of Classes. Cambridge, MA: B. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. (1992) ‘Armstrong on Combinatorial Possibility’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 70 (2), 211–24.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. (1994) ‘Humean Supervenience Debugged’. Mind, 103 (412), 473–90.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. (1998) ‘A World of Truthmakers?’. Times Literary Supplement, 4950, 3033.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. (2001) ‘Truthmaking and Difference-Making’. Noûs, 35 (4), 602–15.Google Scholar
Macbride, Fraser. (2014) ‘How Hochberg Helped Us Take the Ontological Turn’. Dialectica, 68 (2), 163–69.Google Scholar
Maurin, Anna-Sofin. (2002) If Tropes. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Miller, Kristie. (2005) ‘Blocking the Path from Vagueness to Four Dimensionalism’. Ratio, 18 (3), 317–31.Google Scholar
Nolan, Daniel. (2007) ‘Contemporary Metaphysicians and Their Traditions’. Philosophical Topics, 35 (1/2), 118.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. (1962) ‘It Ain't Necessarily So’. Journal of Philosophy, 59 (22), 658–71.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. (1960) Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Christina. (2002) ‘Relational Tropes: A Holistic Definition’. Metaphysica, 3 (2), 97112.Google Scholar
Soames, Scott. (2003) Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1959) Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Taylor, Richard. ([1963] 1992) Metaphysics Fourth Edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Trettin, Kathe. (2000) ‘Tropes and Things’. In Faye, J., Scheffler, U., and Urchs, M. (eds.), Things, Facts and Events (Amsterdam: Rodopi), 279303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ushenko, A. P. (1953) ‘The Principles of Causality’. Journal of Philosophy, 50 (4), 85101.Google Scholar
Williams, Donald C. (1930) ‘The Definition of Yellow and Good’. Journal of Philosophy, 27 (19), 515–27.Google Scholar
Williams, Donald C. (1931) ‘The Nature of Universals and of Abstractions’. The Monist, 41 (4), 583–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Donald C. (1934a) ‘The Argument for Realism’. The Monist, 44 (2), 186209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Donald C. (1934b) ‘Truth, Error and the Location of the Datum’. Journal of Philosophy, 31 (16), 428–38.Google Scholar
Williams, Donald C. (1937/1938) ‘The Realistic Interpretation of Scientific Sentences’. Erkenntis, 7 (1), 169–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Donald C. (1938) ‘The Nature and Variety of the A Priori’. Analysis, 5 (6), 8594.Google Scholar
Williams, Donald C. (1944) ‘Naturalism and the Nature of Things’. Philosophical Review, 53 (5), 417–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Donald C. (1946) ‘Scientific Evidence and Action Patterns: Rejoinder to Professor Black’. Philosophical Review, 55 (5), 580–86.Google Scholar
Williams, Donald C. (1947) The Ground of Induction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Donald C. (1951a) ‘The Myth of Passage’. Journal of Philosophy, 48 (15), 457–71.Google Scholar
Williams, Donald C. (1951b) ‘The Sea Fight Tomorrow’. In Henle, P., Kallen, H. M., and Langer, S. K. (eds.), Structure, Method and Meaning (New York: Liberal Arts Press), 282306.Google Scholar
Williams, Donald C. (1953a) ‘On the Elements of Being: I’. Review of Metaphysics, 7 (1), 318.Google Scholar
Williams, Donald C. (1953b) ‘On the Elements of Being: II’. Review of Metaphysics, 7 (2), 171–92.Google Scholar
Wililams, Donald C. (1953c) ‘Remarks on Causation and Compulsion’. Journal of Philosophy, 50 (4), 120–24.Google Scholar
Williams, Donald C. (1956) ‘The Myth of Passage’. In Hook, S. (ed.), American Philosophers at Work: The Philosophic Scene in the United States (New York: Criterion Books), 315–31.Google Scholar
Williams, Donald C. (1959a) ‘Mind as a Matter of Fact’. Review of Metaphysics, 13 (2), 203–25.Google Scholar
Williams, Donald C. (1959b) ‘Philosophy and Psychoanalysis’. In Hook, S. (ed.), Psychoanalysis, Scientific Method, and Philosophy (New York: New York University Press), 157–79.Google Scholar
Williams, Donald C. ([1959] 1986) ‘Universals and Existents’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 64 (1), 114.Google Scholar
Williams, Donald C. (1963) ‘Necessary Facts’. Review of Metaphysics, 16 (4), 601–26.Google Scholar
Williams, Donald C. (1966a) ‘The Nature of Time’. Unpublished, Harvard University Archives, 1–40.Google Scholar
Williams, Donald C. (1966b) Principles of Empirical Realism: Philosophical Essays. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar