Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

From Survey to Ecology: The Role of the British Vegetation Committee, 1904–1913

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article focuses on early British vegetation science, in particular on the British Vegetation Committee. In earlier histories of (plant) ecology, the period of the Committee's life, 1904–1913, renowned for its surveys and its maps, was depicted as a brief prelude to British plant ecology. This article traces the course of ``survey'' and ``ecology'' within the Committee, demonstrating that survey and ecology were both distinct and intertwined within the Committee.The Committee adhered to two lines of research, one analyzing relatively large areas of vegetation on a small scale (few details), and the other, relatively small areas on a large scale (great detail). When the Committee was founded, vegetation research of relatively large areas dominated, but the balance gradually swung towards research on small areas. Two prominent Committee members, Smith and Tansley, furthermore advocated two research plans, a national survey plan and an ecological research plan. These diverging ideals however co‐existed peacefully and uncontroversially, in contrast to a survey and ecology dichotomy suggested in earlier accounts.An analysis demonstrates the intertwinement of survey and ecology in the period of the Committee's existence. The ``ecological expeditions'' also mapped vegetation, and the scale of the ``survey work'' moreover increased in the Committee's early years. Only by acknowledging their intertwinement can the fate of a particular kind of ``survey-research'' be understood. My analysis shows that this kind of vegetation research did not survive the Committee because of its ecological orientation. This conclusion contradicts the impression prevailing from earlier historical accounts, viz. that British survey work failed because it was insufficiently ecological.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, Garland. 1979. “Naturalists and Experimentalists: the Genotype and the Phenotype.” Studies in History of Biology 4: 179-209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. 1903. “An Experiment of Ecological Surveying.” New Phytologist 2: 167-168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1904. “A Second Experiment in Ecological Surveying.” New Phytologist 3: 200-204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1927. An Outline of the History of the Botanical Department of University College, London. London: Issued by the Department on the Occasion of the Centenary of the College.

  • — 1959. The Nature Conservancy: the First Ten Years. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.

  • Blackman, Frederic F. and Tansley Arthur G. 1905. “Ecology in its Physiological and Phytotopographical Aspects.” New Phytologist 4: 199-203, 232-253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cittadino, Eugene. 1990. Nature as a Laboratory: Darwinian Plant Ecology in the German Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff, Andrew. 1980. National Styles in Scientific Research: the Early History of Ecology in Britain and the U.S.A. Manchester: Unpubl. PhD. thesis.

  • Duff, Andrew and Lowe Philip D. 1981. “Great Britain.” E.J. Kormondy and J.F. McCormick (eds.), Handbook of Contemporary Developments in World Ecology, Westpoint, Greenwood Press, pp. 141-156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faasse, Patricia E 1994. Experiments in Growth, Ph.D. thesis. University of Amsterdam.

  • Hagen, Joel B. 1986. “Ecologists and Taxonomists: Divergent Traditions in Twentieth-Century Plant Geography.” Journal of the History of Biology: 197-310.

  • Gooding, David and F. A. L. James. 1985. Faraday Rediscovered: Essays of the Life and Work of Michael Faraday, 1791-1867. New York: Stockton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kormondy, Edward J. and McCormick J. F. (eds.). 1981. Handbook of Contemporary Developments in World Ecology. Westpoint: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno and Woolgar Steve. 1979/1986. Laboratory Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, Philip D. 1976. “Amateurs and Professionals: the Institutional Emergence of British Plant Ecology.” Journal of the Society Bibl. Nat. Hist 7.4: 517-535.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1983. “Values and Institutions in the History of British Nature Conservation.” A Warren and F.B. Goldsmith (eds.), Conservation in Perspective, Chichester: John Wiley, pp. 329-352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, J.R. 1929. “Obituary Notices. William Gardner Smith, 1866-1928,” Transactions and Proceedins of the Botanical Society of Edinburgh. 30: 175-178 Minutes of the British Ecological Society (BES).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, W.C. 1948. “Dr. George H. Pethybridge, O.B.E.” Nature 161: 1002-1003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, Charles E. 1910. “The Fundamental Units of Vegetation: Historical Development of the Concepts of the Plant Association and the Plant Formation. New Phytologist 9: 18-53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolson, Malcolm. 1989. “National Styles, Divergent Classifications: A Comparative Case Study from the History of French and American Plant Ecology.” Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Science Past and Present: 139-186.

  • Oldroyd, David D. 1990. The Highlands Controversy: Constructing Geological Knowledge through Field Work in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Francis W. 1906. “The Bouche d'Erquy in 1906.” New Phytologist 5: 189-195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1907. Botanical expedition to the Bouche d'Erquy, September 1907. General scheme of Work. 3pp. Cambridge: Tansley Archives. Botany school.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Francis W. and Tansley, Arthur G. 1904. “Methods of Surveying Vegetation on a Large Scale.” New Phytologist 3: 228-237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearsall, William H. 1964. “The Development of Ecology in Britain.” Journal of Ecology 52 (Suppl): 1-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, C. W. 1964. Introduction. J.B. Harley (ed.), The Historian's Guide to Ordnance Survey Maps, London.

  • Salisbury, Edward. 1964. “The Origin and Early Years of the British Ecological Society.” Journal of Ecology 52 (Suppl.): 13-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulte Fischedick, Kaat. Practices and Pluralism: A Socio-Historical Analysis of Early Vegetation Science, 1900-1950. PhD-thesis. University of Amsterdam.

  • Secord, James A. 1986/1990. Controversy in Victorian Geology: The Cambrian-Silurian Dispute. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheail, John. 1987. Seventy-Five Years in Ecology: The British Ecological Society. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Robert. 1900 “Botanical Survey of Scotland, I: The Edinburgh District.” Scottish Geographical Magazine 17.7: 385-415.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1900. “Botanical Survey of Scotland, II: Northern Perthshire District.” Scottish Geographical Magazine 16.8: 441-467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, William G. 1902. “A Botanical Survey of Scotland.” Scottish Geographical Magazine, pp. 132-139.

  • — 1904-1905. “A Botanical Survey of Scotland, III and IV: Forfar and File.” Scottish Geographical Magazine, 20 (1904): 617-628, 21 (1905): 4-23, 22: 57-83, 23: 117-126.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1905. “Formation of a Committee for the Survey and Study of British Vegetation.” New Phytologist 4: 23-26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1905. “The General Committee for the Survey and Study of British Vegetation.” New Phytologist 4: 254-257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1905. “Suggestions for Beginning Survey Work.” New Phytologist 4: 97-102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1911. “The British Vegetation Committee.” New Phytologist 10:99-103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, William G. and Moss, Charles E. 1903. “Geographical Distribution of Vegetation in Yorkshire: Part I-Leeds and Halifax District.” Geographical Journal 21: 375-401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, William G. and Rankin, William M. 1903. “Geographical Distribution of Vegetataion in Yorkshire: Part II-Harrogate and Skipton District.” Geographical Journal 22: 149-178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söderqvist, Thomas. 1986 The Ecologists: From Merry Naturalists to Saviours of the Nation, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, W. Iain. 1978. “Patrick Geddes, 1845-1932.” Geographers Bibliographical Studies 2: 53-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tansley, Arthur G. 1902. “Ecological Notes: Research in British Ecology.” New Phytologist 1: 84-85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1904. “The Problems of Ecology.” New Phytologist 3: 191-200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1939. “British Ecology during the Past Quarter Century: The Plant Community and the Ecosystem.” Journal of Ecology 27: 513-530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1947. “The Early History of Modern Plant Ecology in Britain.” Journal of Ecology 35: 130-137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobey, Ronald C. 1981. Saving the Prairies: The Life Cycle of the Founding School of America Plant Ecology, 1985-1955. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhead, Thomas W. 1906. “Ecology of Woodland Plants in the Neighbourhood of Huddersfield.” Ph.D.thesis University of Zürich. Journal of the Linnean Society 37: 333-406.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1923. “Botanical Survey and Ecology in Yorkshire.” Naturalist: 97-128.

  • — 1929. “In Memoriam: William Gardner Smith, (1866-1928).” Naturalist: 153-156.

  • Worster, Donald. 1977 (1979). Nature's Economy: The Roots of Ecology. New York: Anchor Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Science, Technology and Society, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Kaat Schulte Fischedick

Authors
  1. Kaat Schulte Fischedick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fischedick, K.S. From Survey to Ecology: The Role of the British Vegetation Committee, 1904–1913. Journal of the History of Biology 33, 291–314 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004829916824

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004829916824

Search

Navigation