Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T08:21:44.662Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

David Howie, Interpreting Probability: Controversies and Developments in the Early Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2002), xi + 262 pp., $60.00 cloth.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Branden Fitelson
Branden Fitelson*
Affiliation:
University of California-Berkeley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 70 , Issue 3 , July 2003 , pp. 643 - 646
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernardo, Jose, and Smith, Adrian (2000), Bayesian Theory, 2d ed. NewYork: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Fine, Terence (1973), Theories of Probability: An Examination of Foundations. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gillies, Donald (2000), Philosophical Theories of Probability. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Glymour, Clark (2001), The Mind’s Arrows: Bayes Nets and Graphical Causal Models in Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hájek, Alan (2001), “Probability: Interpretations of”, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2003 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2003/entries/probability-interpret/.Google Scholar
Pearl, Judea (2000), Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Press, James, and Tanur, Judith (2001), The Subjectivity of Scientists and the Bayesian Approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinburne, Richard (ed.) (2002), Bayes’s Theorem. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Talbott, William (2001), “Bayesian Epistemology”, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2001 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2001/entries/epistemology-bayesian/.Google Scholar