Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T12:57:36.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Empirical Examination of the Current State of Publically Available Nanotechnology Guidance Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Laura Fleege  and
Frances Lawrenz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Nanotechnology not only offers the promise of new enhancements to existing materials but also allows for the development of new materials and devices. The potential applications of nanotechnology range from medicine to agriculture to health and environmental science and beyond. Nanotechnology is growing at such a rate that Lux Research in 2007 estimated that nanotechnology will be incorporated into 15% of global manufactured goods by 2014. The U.S. National Nanotechnology Initiative defines nanotechnology as the following: “(1) Research and technology development involving structures with at least one dimension in the range of 1-100 nanometers (nm), frequently with atomic/molecular precision; (2) Creating and using structures, devices, and systems that have unique properties and functions because of their nanoscale dimensions; (3) The ability to control or manipulate on the atomic scale.” Nanomedicine and its subcategories of nanotherapeutics and in vivo nanodiagnostics incorporate nanoscale materials with unique properties that can enable new or improved treatments and diagnostics for many diseases and disorders.

Type
Symposium
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 40 , Issue 4 , Winter 2012 , pp. 751 - 762
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lane, N. and Kalil, T., “The National Nanotechnology Initiative: Present at the Creation,” Issues in Science and Technology 21, no. 4 (2005): 49–54.Google Scholar
Lux Research, The Nanotech Report: Investment Overview and Market Research for Nanotechnology, 5th ed., 2007, at 1.Google Scholar
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, “Nanotechnology,” available at <http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/nanotech/faq.html> (last visited October 24, 2012).+(last+visited+October+24,+2012).>Google Scholar
Fatehi, L. et al., “Recommendations for Nanomedicine Human Subjects Research Oversight: An Evolutionary Approach for an Emerging Field,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 40, no. 4 (2012): 716–750; see also <http://www.eeb.org/?LinkServID=5403FF15-9988-45A3-0E327CBA2AFD88BA&showMeta=0&aa> (last visited November 5, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Code of Federal Regulations,” available at <http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.html#subparta> (last visited October 24, 2012).+(last+visited+October+24,+2012).>Google Scholar
Colvin, V. L., “The potential environment impact of engineered nanomaterials,” Nature Biotechnology 21, no. 10 (2003): 1166–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberdörster, G. Oberdörster, E., and Oberdörster, J., “Nanotoxicity: An Emerging Discipline Evolving from Studies of Ultrafine Particle,” Environmental Health Perspectives 113, no. 7 (2005): 823–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
National Research Council (NRC), Committee to Develop a Research Strategy for Environmental, Health, and Safety Aspects of Engineered Nanomaterial, A Research Strategy for Environmental, Health, and Safety Aspects of Engineered Nanomaterials (Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Resnik, D. B. and Tinkle, S. S., “Ethical Issues in Clinical Trials Involving Nanomedicine,” Contemporary Clinical Trials 28, no. 4 (2007): 433–441; Warheit, D. B., “Debunking Some Misconceptions About Nanotoxicology,” Nano Letters 10, no. 12 (2010): 4777–4782; Joffe, S. and Miller, F. G., “Bench to Bedside: Mapping the Moral Terrain of Clinical Research,” Hastings Center Report 38, no. 2 (2008): 30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchant, G. E. Sylvester, D. J., and Abbott, K. W., Risk Management Principles for Nanotechnology, available at <http://www.law.upenn.edu/academics/institutes/regulation/papers/MarchantRiskManagementPrinciples.pdf> (last visited October 24, 2012).+(last+visited+October+24,+2012).>Google Scholar
University of California-Berkeley, “Finding Information on the Internet: A Tutorial,” available at <http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/TeachingLib/Guides/Internet/FindInfo.html> (last visited October 24, 2012).+(last+visited+October+24,+2012).>Google Scholar
Wise, A. R. Schwartz, J., and Woodruff, T. J., “A Nanotechnology Policy Framework for California: Policy Recommendations for Addressing Potential Health Risks From Nanomaterials,” available at <http://www.prhe.ucsf.edu/prhe/nanoreport-DRAFT.pdf> (last visited October 24, 2012).+(last+visited+October+24,+2012).>Google Scholar
European Environmental Bureau, EEB Position Paper on Nanotechnologies and Nanomaterials, February 2009, available at <http://www.eeb.org/publication/2009/090228_EEB_nano_position_paper.pdfwww.eeb.org/publication/2009/090228_EEB_nano_position_paper.pdf> (last visited April 30, 2012).+(last+visited+April+30,+2012).>Google Scholar
University of Minnesota: Center for Science, Technology, and Public Policy, The Nanotechnology-Biology Interface: Exploring Models for Oversight, September 2005, available at <http://www.hhh.umn.edu/img/assets/9685/nanotech_jan06.pdf> (last visited October 24, 2012).+(last+visited+October+24,+2012).>Google Scholar
European Commission, Nanotechnology and the Health of the EU Citizen in 2020, European and International Forum on Nanotechnology, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, September 5–9, 2005, available at <http://www.euronanoforum2005.org/proceedings/euronanoforum2005_proceedings.pdf> (last visited October 24, 2012).+(last+visited+October+24,+2012).>Google Scholar
See European Environmental Bureau, supra note 14.Google Scholar
University of California, San Diego, “Nanotechnology: Guidelines for Safe Research Practices,” available at <http://blink.ucsd.edu/safety/research-lab/nanotechnology.html> (last visited October 24, 2012).+(last+visited+October+24,+2012).>Google Scholar