Abstract
In the Philebus, Socrates argues that pleasure, like judgment, can be “false” (pseudēs). Most scholars who discuss this claim restrict their interpretation to Socrates’ first argument that pleasure can be “false”, where Socrates uses pseudēs as a synonym of “incorrect” (ouk orthēs) (37a–40e). As a result, scholars have failed to recognize that in the next argument (41a–42c) Socrates uses pseudēs to pick out a different problem with pleasure: in certain circumstances, a pleasure can deceptively appear to a subject to be larger or smaller than it really is. As Socrates explicitly distinguishes between these two problems with pleasure, he is guilty of neither confusion nor intentional equivocation in his application of the predicate pseudēs. The distinction also resolves many longstanding interpretive puzzles, including the relationship between mixed and “false” pleasures and why Socrates describes the pleasures of sight, hearing, smell and learning as both pure and “true” (alētheis).
Brandt, R. 1997. “Wahre und falsche Affekte im platonischen Philebos”. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 59, 1–18.Search in Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (trans.) 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. Princeton/The Bollingen Series LXXI–2.10.1515/9781400835850Search in Google Scholar
Burnet, J. 1901 (ed.). Platonis Opera. Vol. 2. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Butler, J. 1999, “On Whether Pleasure’s Esse is Percipi: Rethinking Republic 583b–585a”. Ancient Philosophy 19, 285–98.10.5840/ancientphil199919228Search in Google Scholar
Charles, D./Peramatzis, M. 2016. “Aristotle on Truth–Bearers”. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 50, 101–41.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198778226.003.0004Search in Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. 2004. Aristotle on Truth. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511482496Search in Google Scholar
Delcomminette, S. 2006. Le Philèbe de Platon: introduction à l’agathologie platonicienne. Leiden/Boston. 10.1163/9789047409137Search in Google Scholar
–. 2003. “False Pleasures, Appearance and Imagination in the Philebus”. Phronesis 48, 215–37.10.1163/156852803322519226Search in Google Scholar
Dixsaut, M./Teisserenc, F. (eds.) 1999. La fêlure du plaisir: études sur le Philèbe de Platon, Vol. 1. Commentaires. Paris.10.4000/books.vrin.5705Search in Google Scholar
Dybikowski, J. C. 1970a, “False Pleasure and the Philebus”. Phronesis 15, 147–65.10.1163/156852870X00116Search in Google Scholar
–. 1970b. “Mixed and False Pleasure in the Philebus: A Reply,” The Philosophical Quarterly 20, 244–247.10.2307/2218397Search in Google Scholar
Evans, M. 2008. “Plato on the Possibility of Hedonic Mistakes”. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 35, 89–124.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2007, “Plato on the Meaning of Pain”. Apeiron 40, 71–93.10.1515/APEIRON.2007.40.1.71Search in Google Scholar
Fletcher (unpublished). “Pleasure, Judgment, and the Function of the Painter–Scribe Analogy”.Search in Google Scholar
Frede, D. 1997. Platon: Philebos, Übersetzung und Kommentar. Göttingen. Search in Google Scholar
–. 1993. Plato: Philebus. Translated, with Introduction & Notes. Indianapolis.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1992. “Disintegration and Restoration: Pleasure and Pain in Plato’s Philebus”. In The Cambridge Companion to Plato. Ed. R. Kraut. Cambridge, 425–63.10.1017/CCOL0521430186.014Search in Google Scholar
–. 1985, “Rumpelstiltskin’s Pleasures: True and False Pleasures in Plato’s Philebus”. Phronesis 30, 151–80.10.1163/156852885X00039Search in Google Scholar
Gallop, D. 1960. “True and False Pleasures”. The Philosophical Quarterly 10, 331–342.10.2307/2216408Search in Google Scholar
Gosling J. C. B./Taylor, C. C. W. 1982. The Greeks on Pleasure. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198246664.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
–. 1975. Plato: Philebus, Translated with Notes and Commentary. OxfordSearch in Google Scholar
–. 1961. “Father Kenny on False Pleasures in Plato’s Philebus”. Phronesis 6, 41–5.10.1163/156852861X00053Search in Google Scholar
–. 1959. “False Pleasures: Philebus 35c–41b”. Phronesis 4, 44–54.10.1163/156852859X00065Search in Google Scholar
Hackforth, R. 1945. Plato’s Examination of Pleasure. New York.Search in Google Scholar
Harte, V. 2004. “The Philebus on Pleasure: The Good, the Bad and the False”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104, 111–28.10.1111/j.1467-9264.2004.00148.xSearch in Google Scholar
Kenny, A. 1960. “False Pleasures in the Philebus: A Reply to Mr. Gosling”. Phronesis 5, 45–52.10.1163/156852860X00144Search in Google Scholar
Lovibond, S. 1990. “True and False Pleasures”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 90, 213–30.10.1093/aristotelian/90.1.213Search in Google Scholar
McLaughlin, A. 1969. “A Note on False Pleasures in the Philebus”. Philosophical Quarterly 19, 57–61.10.2307/2218188Search in Google Scholar
Mooradian, N. 1996, “Converting Protarchus: Relativism and False Pleasures of Anticipation in Plato’s Philebus”. Ancient Philosophy 16, 93–112.10.5840/ancientphil199616114Search in Google Scholar
–. 1995. “What to Do about False Pleasures of Overestimation? Philebus 41a5–42a5”. Apeiron 28, 91–112.10.1515/APEIRON.1995.28.2.91Search in Google Scholar
Muniz, F. 2014. “Propositional Pleasures in Plato’s Philebus”. Journal of Ancient Philosophy 8, 49–75.10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v8i1p49-75Search in Google Scholar
Penner, T. 1970. “False Anticipatory Pleasures: Philebus 36a3–41a6”. Phronesis 15, 166–78.10.1163/156852870X00125Search in Google Scholar
Ogihara, S. 2012. “False Pleasure: Philebus 36c–40d”. In Presocratics and Plato: Festschrift at Delphi in Honor of Charles Kahn. Eds. R. Patterson/V. Karasmanis/A.Hermann. Las Vegas/Zurich/Athens, 291–310.Search in Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. 1960. “Logic and Metaphysics in Some Earlier Works of Aristotle.” In Plato and Aristotle in the Mid–Fourth Century. Eds. I. During/G. E. L. Owen. Göteborg, 163–190.Search in Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. (trans.) 2016. Aristotle: Metaphysics. With an Introduction and Notes. Indianapolis.Search in Google Scholar
Shields, C. 1999. Order in Multiplicity: Homonymy in the Philosophy of Aristotle. Oxford.10.1093/0199253072.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Teisserenc, F. 1999. “L’Empire du Faux ou le Plaisir de l’image: Philebe 37a–41a”. In La fêlure du plaisir: études sur le Philèbe de Platon. Eds. M. Dixsaut/F. Teisserenc. Vol. 1. Paris, 267–297.10.4000/books.vrin.5820Search in Google Scholar
Van Riel, G. 1999. “Le plaisir est-il la réplétion d’un manque? La définition du plaisir (Philebe 32a–36c) et la physiologie des plaisirs faux (42c–44a)”. In La fêlure du plaisir: études sur le Philèbe de Platon. Eds. M. Dixsaut/F. Teisserenc. Vol. 1. Paris, 300–314.Search in Google Scholar
Ward, J. 2008. Aristotle on Homonymy: Dialectic and Science. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511663697Search in Google Scholar
Warren, J. 2014. The Pleasures of Reason in Plato, Aristotle and the Hellenistic Hedonists. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139178976Search in Google Scholar
Westerink, L. G. (ed.) 1959. Damascius, Lectures on the Philebus, Wrongly Attributed to Olympiodorus. Amsterdam.Search in Google Scholar
Whiting, J. 2014. “Fool’s Pleasures in Plato’s Philebus”. In Strategies of Argument: Essays in Ancient Ethics, Epistemology and Logic. Ed. Mi–Kyoung Lee. Oxford, 21–59.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199890477.003.0002Search in Google Scholar
Williams, B./Bedford, E. 1959. “Pleasure and Belief”. Proceeding of Aristotelian Society 73, 57–72.10.1093/aristoteliansupp/33.1.57Search in Google Scholar
Williams, C. J. F. 1974. “False Pleasures”. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 26, 295–297.10.1007/BF00398890Search in Google Scholar
Wolfsdorf, D. 2013. Pleasure in Ancient Greek Philosophy. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511667510Search in Google Scholar
–. 2014. “Plato on Truth Value and Truth Aptness”. Mēthexis 27, 139–158.10.1163/24680974-90000636Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston