Skip to main content
Log in

Should Political Philosophy be more Realistic?

Bell, Duncan (ed). 2009. Political Thought and International Relations: Variations on a Realist Theme. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 256 pp Bourke, Richard, and Geuss, Raymond (eds). 2009. Political Judgement: Essays for John Dunn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 368 pp

  • Book Review
  • Published:
Res Publica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. PJ hereafter.

  2. PTIR hereafter.

References

  • Appiah, Kwame A. 2008. Experiments in Ethics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, Isaiah. 2003. The Crooked Timber of Humanity. London: Pimlico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, John. 1979. Western political theory in the face of the future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, John. 2000. The Cunning of Unreason. London: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estlund, David. 2007. Democratic Authority. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeden, Michael. 2009. Failures of Political Thinking. Political Studies 57.

  • Galston, William. 2009. Realism and Moralism in Political Theory: The Legacies of John Rawls. In Reflections on Rawls: an assessment of his legacy, ed. Young, Shaun P. Farnham, Ashgate.

  • Geuss, Raymond. 2008. Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, Joshua D. 2003. From neural ‘is’ to moral ‘ought’: what are the moral implications of neuroscientific moral psychology? Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4: October.

  • Gray, John. 2000. Two Faces of Liberalism. New York, NY: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, John. 2007. Black Mass: Apocalyptic Religion and the Death of Utopia. London: Penguin.

  • Hampshire, Stuart. 1989. Innocence and Experience. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampshire, Stuart. 1999. Justice is Conflict. London: Duckworth & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, Chantal. 2005. On the Political. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newey, Glenn. 2000. After Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, Shaun, and Joshua Knobe. 2008. Moral Responsbility and Determinism: The Cognitive Science of Folk Intuitions. In Experimental Philosophy, ed. Joshua Knobe, and Shaun Nichols, 105–128. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philp, Mark. 2007. Political Conduct. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter. 2006. Moral Intuitionism Meets Empirical Psychology. In Metaethics After Moore, ed. Terry Horgan, and Mark Timmons, 339–365. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift, Adam. 2008. The Value of Philosophy in Nonideal Circumstances. Social Theory and Practice 34: 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles. 1984. Philosophy and its history. In Philosophy in History, ed. Richard Rorty, Jerome B Schneewind, and Quentin Skinner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Bernard. 2005. In the Beginning was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Floyd.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Floyd, J. Should Political Philosophy be more Realistic?. Res Publica 16, 337–347 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-009-9104-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-009-9104-4

Navigation