Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of Excessive Journal Self-Citations: A Case Study on the Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica Journal

Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is an increasing trend towards assessing the scientific performance of researchers and institutions of higher learning in the form of journal publications and the associated citations. Currently, the journal impact factor (JIF) value is the most widely used measure for any academic contents. However, there are growing concerns for the unethical practices adopted by journal editors to manipulate the JIF computations. Recently, a Swiss journal, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica which has a JIF value of 0.655 in the year 2006 registers a remarkable JIF increment (of 119%) to 1.439 in the year 2007. It is believed that the journal can achieve such a prominent JIF improvement by publishing a single editorial article that self-cited 66 of its own articles published either in the year 2005 or 2006. The journal has been revoked of any JIF value in the following year of 2008. Thus, it is interesting to review the possible alternative bibliographical trend for the journal should the self-cite event has been avoided, the circumstances leading to the decision by the editor to publish such an article and the possible ethical implications or lessons that can be derived from this incident.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adam, D. (2002). The counting house. Nature, 415, 726–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, D. M., Liesegang, T. J., & Schachat, A. P. (2005). Meeting our ethical obligations in medical publishing: Responsibilities of editors, authors, and readers of peer-reviewed journals. Archives of Ophthalmology, 123, 684–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atlas, M. C. (2003). Emerging ethical issues in instructions to authors of high-impact biomedical journals. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 91, 442–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, S., & Walter, G. (2001). The Impact Factor: Time for change. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 35, 563–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, H. (2007). How impact factors changed medical publishing and science. British Medical Journal, 334, 561–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaham, M., Wears, R. L., & Weber, E. (2002). Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 287, 2847–2850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chew, M., Villanueva, E. V., & Van Der Weyden, M. B. (2007). Life and times of the impact factor: retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994–2005) and their Editors’ views. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 100, 142–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, R. E., & Rolfe, G. (2009). PhD by publication: A prospective as well as retrospective award? Some subversive thoughts. Nurse Education Today, 29, 590–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P. M., Lewenstein, B. V., Simon, D. H., Booth, J. G., & Connolly, M. J. (2008). Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: Randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 337, a568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Maria, A. N. (2003). A report card for journals. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 42, 952–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassoulaki, A., Papilas, K., Paraskeva, A., & Patris, K. (2002). Impact factor bias and proposed adjustments for its determination. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 46, 902–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassoulaki, A., Paraskeva, A., Papilas, K., & Karabinis, G. (2000). Self-citations in six anaesthesia journals and their significance in determining the impact factor. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 84, 266–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foo, J. Y. (2009). The retrospective analysis of bibliographical trends for nine biomedical engineering journals from 1999 to 2007. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 37, 1474–1481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gami, A. S., Montori, V. M., Wilczynski, N. L., & Haynes, R. B. (2004). Author self-citation in the diabetes literature. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 170, 1925–1927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes to science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122, 108–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 295, 90–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golubic, R., Rudes, M., Kovacic, N., Marusic, M., & Marusic, A. (2008). Calculating impact factor: How bibliographical classification of journal items affects the impact factor of large and small journals. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14, 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemmingsson, A., Mygind, T., Skjennald, A., & Edgren, J. (2002). Manipulation of impact factors by editors of scientific journals. AJR American Journal of Roentgenology, 178, 767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, R. (2007). Should we ditch impact factors? British Medical Journal, 334, 569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (2003). Self-citation and self-reference: Credibility and promotion in academic publication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 251–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Scientific Information. 2009. Journal Citation Reports. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for Scientific Information, Thomson Scientific.

  • Kurmis, A. P. (2003). Understanding the limitations of the journal impact factor. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 85, 2449–2454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. P., Schotland, M., Bacchetti, P., & Bero, L. A. (2002). Association of journal quality indicators with methodological quality of clinical research articles. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 287, 2805–2808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieminen, P., Carpenter, J., Rucker, G., & Schumacher, M. (2006). The relationship between quality of research and citation frequency. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 6, 42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redman, B. K., & Merz, J. F. (2006). Research misconduct policies of high impact biomedical journals. Accountability in Research, 13, 247–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saha, S., Saint, S., & Christakis, D. A. (2003). Impact factor: A valid measure of journal quality? Journal of the Medical Library Association, 91, 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutte, H. K., & Svec, J. G. (2007). Reaction of Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica on the current trend of impact factor measures. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 59, 281–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. (1997). Journal accused of manipulating impact factor. British Medical Journal, 314, 461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trikalinos, N. A., Evangelou, E., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2008). Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61, 464–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vakil, N. (2005). The journal impact factor: Judging a book by its cover. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 100, 2436–2437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, G., Bloch, S., Hunt, G., & Fisher, K. (2003). Counting on citations: A flawed way to measure quality. The Medical Journal of Australia, 178, 280–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. (2007). Should we ditch impact factors? British Medical Journal, 334, 568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

All the bibliographical data used were obtained from the Journal Citation Report of the Thomson Scientific.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jong Yong Abdiel Foo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Foo, J.Y.A. Impact of Excessive Journal Self-Citations: A Case Study on the Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica Journal. Sci Eng Ethics 17, 65–73 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9177-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9177-7

Keywords

Navigation